canon(classification): add the publication category, standard v1.1
Implements CUST-WP-0070-T01. New §5.7 publication: repos whose purpose is to publish and keep a body of authored content for readers, where the corpus itself is the deliverable. It is durable, unlike project — a published record is kept, not resolved and retired. Disambiguated against research (which asks what we need to understand), product, and tooling (a wiki engine is tooling; the corpus it serves is a publication). Added to the §5 allowed values, the §11 decision procedure, the §16 agent prompt, and allowed.yaml. history and participation join the knowledge_and_evidence capability family so hall-of-helix's tags do not warn. Version 1.1, not 2.0: §17 previously read any allowed-value change as major. This addition is purely additive — no existing classification becomes invalid, and neither validator enforces a version match, so the 125 repo files declaring 1.0 keep validating. §17 now distinguishes adding a permitted value (minor) from removing or renaming one (major), rather than leaving the rule contradicted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SQ6oF1DtVDKcD1FCpvRVLx
This commit is contained in:
parent
c70d7899bb
commit
c0308bb573
2 changed files with 54 additions and 7 deletions
|
|
@ -5,14 +5,14 @@ title: "Repo Classification Standard"
|
|||
domain: custodian
|
||||
scope: all-domains
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
version: "1.0"
|
||||
version: "1.1"
|
||||
created: "2026-06-22"
|
||||
provenance: "Authored within the Helix Forge effort; promoted into custodian canon as the ecosystem-wide repo classification standard. Custodian is the interim steward."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Repo Classification Standard
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** Draft v1.0
|
||||
**Status:** Draft v1.1
|
||||
**Scope:** Helix Forge, based and connected information and code repositories
|
||||
**Purpose:** Provide a simple, stable, and practical classification model for clustering repositories by work category, intended market domain, capabilities, and business responsibility.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ category:
|
|||
- tooling
|
||||
- product
|
||||
- business
|
||||
- publication
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.1 `experimental`
|
||||
|
|
@ -316,6 +317,44 @@ category: business
|
|||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.7 `publication`
|
||||
|
||||
Use for repos whose purpose is to publish and keep a body of authored content
|
||||
for readers — halls, records of participation, archives, anthologies, edited
|
||||
collections. The corpus itself is the deliverable.
|
||||
|
||||
Main question:
|
||||
|
||||
> What do we put on the record, and keep readable?
|
||||
|
||||
Typical signs:
|
||||
|
||||
- the repository *is* the content, not a system that handles content,
|
||||
- entries are authored and attributed rather than generated,
|
||||
- the collection grows and is curated; it is not expected to retire,
|
||||
- an explicit contract for what an entry must contain,
|
||||
- tooling exists only to check or render the corpus.
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
category: publication
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Disambiguation.** `publication` is durable, like the other categories and
|
||||
unlike `project`: a published record is kept, not resolved and retired.
|
||||
|
||||
- Not `research`: research asks "what do we need to understand?" and produces
|
||||
standards, taxonomies, and reference material. A publication asks what should
|
||||
be on the record and readable. This standard is `research`; a hall of authored
|
||||
first-person entries is `publication`.
|
||||
- Not `product`: a publication is not a repeatable offering with consumers to
|
||||
onboard, even when it is public.
|
||||
- Not `tooling`: a wiki engine, a documentation generator, or a citation service
|
||||
is `tooling`; the corpus it serves may be a separate `publication` repo.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Domains
|
||||
|
||||
Allowed values:
|
||||
|
|
@ -692,6 +731,7 @@ Ask:
|
|||
4. Is this reusable internal tooling/infrastructure supporting other work? → `tooling`
|
||||
5. Is this reusable and offerable to users/customers? → `product`
|
||||
6. Is this about commercial, legal, financial, strategic, or organizational viability? → `business`
|
||||
7. Is the repository itself an authored, curated body of content kept for readers? → `publication`
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Identify the primary domain
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1118,7 +1158,7 @@ Use the following prompt for agent-assisted classification.
|
|||
Classify this repository according to the Repo Classification Standard.
|
||||
|
||||
Return a YAML block with:
|
||||
- category: one of experimental, research, project, tooling, product, business
|
||||
- category: one of experimental, research, project, tooling, product, business, publication
|
||||
- domain: one of infotech, financials, communication, consumer, health, industrials, energy, utilities, materials, realestate, crypto, agents, space, government
|
||||
- secondary_domains: zero or more allowed domains, excluding the primary domain
|
||||
- capability_tags: lowercase kebab-case tags describing what the repo does or enables
|
||||
|
|
@ -1137,14 +1177,18 @@ Provide a brief rationale after the YAML.
|
|||
This standard SHOULD be versioned semantically.
|
||||
|
||||
- Patch version: wording clarifications, examples, typo fixes.
|
||||
- Minor version: new optional fields, new examples, non-breaking guidance.
|
||||
- Major version: renamed fields, changed allowed values, changed classification semantics.
|
||||
- Minor version: new optional fields, new examples, non-breaking guidance, and
|
||||
**adding** a permitted value to a controlled vocabulary — additive changes
|
||||
leave every existing classification valid.
|
||||
- Major version: renamed fields, **removed or renamed** allowed values, changed
|
||||
classification semantics — anything that can invalidate a classification
|
||||
already written.
|
||||
|
||||
Current version:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
standard: Repo Classification Standard
|
||||
version: 1.0
|
||||
version: 1.1
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
|
|||
# to match the standard version. CUST-WP-0050 T01.
|
||||
|
||||
standard: "Repo Classification Standard"
|
||||
version: "1.0"
|
||||
version: "1.1"
|
||||
canon_id: "canon-repo-classification"
|
||||
|
||||
# category — exactly 1 required (§5)
|
||||
|
|
@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ categories:
|
|||
- tooling
|
||||
- product
|
||||
- business
|
||||
- publication
|
||||
|
||||
# domain / secondary_domains — primary exactly 1; secondaries 0..n (§6)
|
||||
domains:
|
||||
|
|
@ -81,6 +82,8 @@ capability_families:
|
|||
- traceability
|
||||
- documentation
|
||||
- decision-support
|
||||
- history
|
||||
- participation
|
||||
platform_and_operations:
|
||||
- platform
|
||||
- deployment
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue