docs(canon): accept ADR-012 and retract the parts it supersedes
ADR-012 accepted 2026-08-25.
ADR-010 — partially superseded, notes added inline:
decision 1: "a reading of the repositories" never said which copy, and the
answer was neither the forge nor a working copy but whichever checkout last
synced. The hub holds no repository files and never reads one.
decision 5: "central derives, does not accept pushes" was policy while the
workstation pushed everything.
decision 6: "preliminary" was named but never built.
ADR-003 — partially superseded:
decision 2: fingerprints composed from filesystem mtime are invalidated in
part. mtime is a property of one workstation, differs across clones, and
says nothing about content. Evidence: git_fingerprint for the-custodian
held the initial commit while last_state_synced_at was minutes old.
decision 5: the rebuild principle was correct but never exercised, and its
"without data loss" claim holds only while nothing exists solely in the hub
— which was false for 111 records on 2026-08-25.
ADR-001, ADR-005, ADR-007 and ADR-011 reviewed and unaffected; ADR-007 is
reinforced, since derived identifiers let an overlay and a forge-derived
projection compute the same identity.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8c2825f4c3
commit
c0cead2169
3 changed files with 59 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
|
|||
id: CUST-ADR-012
|
||||
type: architecture-decision-record
|
||||
title: "What the Hub Projects: Forge as Projection Source, Working Copies as Preliminary Overlay"
|
||||
status: proposed
|
||||
status: accepted
|
||||
owner: the-custodian
|
||||
revision: "draft-1"
|
||||
revision: "1.0"
|
||||
last_reviewed: "2026-08-25"
|
||||
review_interval: 6m
|
||||
decided_by: Bernd Worsch
|
||||
|
|
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ tags: ["architecture", "state-hub", "forgejo", "projection", "provenance", "auth
|
|||
|
||||
## Status
|
||||
|
||||
Proposed. Supersedes `ADR-010` decision 1's phrase "authoritative as a reading of
|
||||
**Accepted 2026-08-25** by Bernd Worsch. Supersedes `ADR-010` decision 1's phrase "authoritative as a reading of
|
||||
the repositories" by making the reading concrete, and implements decision 6's
|
||||
unbuilt notion of "preliminary".
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -227,6 +227,11 @@ built. Those belong to implementation.
|
|||
- **`ADR-010`** — decisions 1 and 5 are sharpened, not reversed: central still
|
||||
derives and still does not accept pushes of derived state. Decision 6's
|
||||
"preliminary" gains a mechanism. The local-cache-versus-database framing stands.
|
||||
- **`ADR-003`** — partially superseded. Decision 2 composes fingerprints from
|
||||
filesystem `mtime`, which is a property of one workstation rather than of the
|
||||
source; under decision 1 here the input is the commit. Decision 5 already
|
||||
stated the rebuild principle correctly but had never been exercised; decision 7
|
||||
here makes it an operation with a source, a scope and a verification.
|
||||
- **`ADR-007`** — derived identifiers become more valuable here: a forge-derived
|
||||
projection and a preliminary overlay compute the same identifier for the same
|
||||
record, so absorbing an overlay entry needs no reconciliation.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue