diff --git a/docs/security-collaboration-review-2026-10-10.md b/docs/security-collaboration-review-2026-10-10.md
index 8a2fc43f..832d6a48 100644
--- a/docs/security-collaboration-review-2026-10-10.md
+++ b/docs/security-collaboration-review-2026-10-10.md
@@ -542,3 +542,43 @@ materialization and first session remain in their existing owner records and
 ORGREF driver. Three historical Platform C07 aliases still hold13 tasks
 (8done/5wait); their diagnosis is retained, with no deletion or artificial
 closure. Source totals do not silently include those unbacked historical rows.
+
+### Current milestones and review checkpoints
+
+The founder requested a summary, closure outlook, parallelism and an independent
+assessment on2026-10-11. A fresh-context read-only reviewer checked current owner
+workplans and safe native receipts. It used the same inherited model, so this is
+an independent worker assessment, not a different-model or comprehensive estate
+audit. Its effort ranges are planning judgments, not measured calendar promises.
+
+| Bundle | Next acceptance | Conditional effort and closures |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| Service JWT | Attended KEY39 negative claims and real expiry/cleanup; Mason operator/ESO capability and nonmember refusal; platform denial; actual Secrets Engine adoption |2–4focused sessions. KEY39, MASON9 and SECRETS8 are the strongest next whole-plan closures. RPF35T02 can finish; RPF35 retains six other unfinished tasks. |
+| Human identity and membership | Actual signed-in readback, tegwick U05–U08, precise changed fact/owner for scoped mutation/revocation, Fluid salt create-once evidence; ordinary management restoration |1–2attended sessions plus1–2implementation/verification sessions. MASON5 can finish afterT05/T06. USER27 also needs matrix/invitation/mail and real VERGABE-WP-0019 acceptance; catalogue bootstrap is not that proof. |
+| First reusable Forgejo SecurityCase | Implement acknowledged type1.2, authenticate six-object provenance, native closed adapters/receipts, separately authorized mint/delivery, login/denial/cleanup/created-only rollback |4–7focused sessions including attendance. First session closes NK48T06/MASON10T03/WARDEN44T03; their remaining reuse tasks still prevent whole-plan closure. A service-JWT target cannot reuse a browser type by relabeling. |
+| Audit and independent monitoring | Six-pin sender/custody, compatible commit/acceptance-time windows, persistent native rollout, actual retry/heartbeat/silence and Qonto receiver/collector evidence |4–7focused sessions across independent Access and Qonto tracks. KG5 can close after observer acceptance; AUDIT13 needs both senders. Quiet-stream evidence also needs its real observation interval/grace, including a24h Qonto cadence. |
+
+Keep three bounded implementation/preparation workstreams running under the
+root coordinator, respecting the four-agent runtime limit. Separate artifact
+ownership; serialize attended credential sessions and live cluster rollouts.
+Parallel drafting/tests/native-proof preparation help; more workers do not
+remove actual login, revocation, expiry or observation time. Replace repeated
+full-history reviews with frozen inputs and explicit delta reviews after a
+baseline is accepted, preserving failed receipts and exact final bindings.
+
+Commission a different capable model's top-level architecture/dependency/risk
+assessment now, before expensive first-case execution. Reassess the executable
+adapter/receipt/recovery package before Forgejo's first session, integration after
+service JWT and the real-human milestones, and evidence completeness after both
+sender and observer acceptance. Use primary owner sources, native pins/receipts,
+unresolved risks and the close-down checklist; source tests alone do not support
+operational acceptance. User Engine still has44HIGH findings across8CVEs under
+temporary acceptance, with the18October review deadline. Access mandatory-commit
+source remains undeployed; HTTP503 does not prove an open-stance consumer denies.
+Qonto process counters are not durable transactional completeness.
+
+One source hygiene issue remains for the User owner: USER27T04's old qualifier
+mentions unresolved factor custody, while its later narrative and USER28's
+concrete evidence identify an available handoff and tegwick's attended run as
+the next act. Verify and refresh that owner qualifier before scheduling; do not
+revive an obsolete secret request from historical prose.