Three dated corrections, following the blockquote convention ADR-007 uses:
- Decision 2's merge/refresh dichotomy is not exhaustive. Repository records
took a third shape — cache-only records whose source exists and is reachable
but was never introduced to central. Refreshing would have destroyed them.
- The Context recorded the shared port but not why it was silent: an unbound
ssh -L binds every loopback family, and ExitOnForwardFailure fires only when
every bind fails.
- A new Outcome section states that the ADR's own remediation never landed and
the condition was still live seven weeks later.
Refs CUST-WP-0067-T06
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ADR-008 and ADR-009 were concurrently allocated by two authors on
2026-08-17. adr-008-multi-tenancy-model.md (Four Planes) has earlier
provenance and keeps 008; 009 is left free for that lane. Hub authority
becomes ADR-010, federated namespaces ADR-011. Cross-references in ADR-007
updated.
A live demonstration of ADR-007 decision 1's own subject: sequential
allocation with concurrent writers. ADR numbering is not covered by that
decision, which governs PREFIX-WP-NNNN only — gap to close.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 13:04:04 +02:00
Renamed from canon/architecture/adr-008-hub-authority-and-local-cache-model.md (Browse further)
