183dd35467
R1 Scope -> itc-ident (itc-access keeps narrower ResourceScope). R2 Assurance Level -> itc-ident, distinct from governance AssuranceCase. R3 Evidence + Evidence Source are a general pair (container vs extracted assertion), owned together, not by commerce; itc-gov no longer owns Evidence. R4 Relationship Tuple -> itc-access (already modelled there). R5 Adjudication Outcome follows R3; general, not commerce-owned. assurance_tier splits: general strength dimension vs commerce's named Counterparty Assurance Gradient. R6 Community + Household extend itc-org CollectiveActor; Family rejected as a collective actor and given its own seeded concept area. One open question remains: the home for the evidence pair (dedicated itc-evid model vs itc-gov incumbency). Recommendation: dedicated model. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| adr-001-workplans-as-repo-artefacts.md | ||
| adr-002-custodian-agent-runtime-design.md | ||
| adr-003-materialized-derived-state.md | ||
| adr-004-connectivity-first-network-posture.md | ||
| adr-005-cross-repo-workplans-project-repos.md | ||
| adr-006-canon-federation-concept-ownership.md | ||
| adr-007-workplan-identity-and-repo-worker-topology.md | ||