access-engine/workplans/ADHOC-2026-10-11.md
tegwick 7687ac2dda
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 1s
Record exact execution context source agreement
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6.1-sol
Assistant-Session: 01a126e1-76f8-7643-8cf3-e93336539ade
2026-10-11 16:28:54 +02:00

81 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown

---
id: FLEX-WP-ADHOC-2026-10-11
type: workplan
title: "Review application catalogue continuation ownership"
domain: infotech
repo: access-engine
status: finished
owner: codex
topic_slug: netkingdom
created: "2026-10-11"
updated: "2026-10-11"
state_hub_workstream_id: "80dff215-079d-5779-9ac0-d20f9d81eb4f"
---
## Review exact provider obligations after native one-app registration
```task
id: FLEX-WP-ADHOC-2026-10-11-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "df835b25-e470-5d7f-990f-f56530f391a4"
```
Read Access/User INTENT, accepted security-layer model v0.8, IAM profile,
User boundary contract, FLEX-DEC-2026-019/readback contract and current
native R1 verification. Recorded the Access owner review in
`docs/reviews/2026-10-11-user-catalogue-continuation.md`.
No source authorization rule, runtime, credential or foreign task changed.
The provider-specific outstanding ask is live in `FLEX-IN-0003` before this
review closes; User Engine retains USER-WP-0026-T03/USER-WP-0028-T02,
including real human projection and broader journey acceptance.
`docs/coordination/2026-10-11-user-catalogue-continuation.json` prepares the
response case with explicit local-only custody; it enables no worker wake.
## Characterize exact task-execution PDP and approval binding
```task
id: FLEX-WP-ADHOC-2026-10-11-T02
status: done
priority: high
```
Read Access AGENTS.md, INTENT.md (Responsibility Boundary: the sole PDP;
protected systems own enforcement), current open-workplan brief, canonical
request/enrichment/approval-binding contracts and served secrets-engine v2
policy/caller-auth source. Read Custodian environment and delegated-owner-review
canon plus the exact Secrets/Platform execution designs recorded in the stage
manifest. Prepared a source consumer integration contract and actual Go
characterization tests against an isolated copy of Access source at
`c829e530309d4a885a7dbe34ddc316e0c25d205f`.
Validation: `go test ./pkg/api ./internal/policy -run ExecutionContract -count=1`
passed. Ten semantic mutations change both full and approval-free binding;
claim removal and registry-enriched/submitted digest joins match the published
API. The real shipped v2 policy denies execute-ccr/human principals while
ignoring fake execution context on apply, establishing the required exact action,
policy-package and verified initiating-principal integration gaps.
This task completes bounded source characterization and review preparation.
The three prepared source files remain pending application/publication; this
record does not establish owner assent, a native entitlement, an authenticated
initiator representation, a mediator/ledger, exact native CCR/grant, or lifecycle
adoption. No native call, credential request, DB write, commit or source-policy
activation ran. Existing Secrets T06 and Platform RPF35-T02 remain open.
Formal Access-own-role source review prepared after this completed anchor was
persisted in commit `f30e08cc96634d48987fb7203b71961437119535`: candidate
`docs/reviews/2026-10-11-task-execution-pdp-source.md`. The review approves only
the exact proposed integration direction and source characterization; it grants
no package/action, native entitlement, representation identity or lifecycle adoption.
Access-own-role independent review of the exact typed Secrets execution-context
source manifest `32a419752e4a3ed7cf8f906fc40ebbaa516b9a4d6134be2df29243ce97213e40`
prepared in `docs/reviews/2026-10-11-secrets-execution-context-source.md` under T02.
Independently reproduced the 99 focused source checks. Agreement covers only
closed descriptor/request propagation and canonical claim/PDP digest joins;
exact owner compiler, new action/package, authenticated initiating representation,
trusted consume transport, durable one-shot journal, mediator, native scope and
lifecycle adoption remain unimplemented/unadmitted. Prior reviews are preserved.