access-engine/workplans/FLEX-WP-0035-per-identity-application-readback.md
tegwick 8f2ba75e4a
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 1s
Build and Publish Container Image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 58s
FLEX-WP-0035 T01-T03: application access readback pin
Contract accepted by user-engine; FLEX-DEC-2026-019 accepted.
- serve-readback: dedicated pin, no enforcement routes, own caller binding
- CheckRequest.purpose hashed into every digest when set; /v1/check refuses it
- POST /v1/readback/application_access and GET /v1/readback/systems
- optional client_binding on protected systems; readback schemas
- schemaguard implements maxItems
- T05 added: informed-decision needs an application.access rule over
  realm-level claims (its lifecycle rules read authentication_audience)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 609675@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4987a36e-eb38-4b10-803c-15a29cd78212
2026-10-09 20:02:31 +02:00

158 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown

---
id: FLEX-WP-0035
type: workplan
title: "Per-identity application access readback and readable protected-system registry for user-engine"
domain: infotech
repo: access-engine
status: active
owner: claude
topic_slug: netkingdom
created: "2026-10-09"
updated: "2026-10-09"
related: [USER-WP-0026, USER-WP-0028]
state_hub_workstream_id: "cb9755fa-6824-5288-81c4-3aa2fbff1a9f"
---
user-engine (message `f1637c32`, 2026-10-09, routed by net-kingdom `19a0cbcd`)
needs to show a signed-in person which applications they can use. Its
`USER-WP-0026-T03` and `USER-WP-0028-T02` are `blocked_on` access-engine. The
PEP stance is already fail-closed: no decision renders `unavailable`, and allow
is never inferred from membership, platform role, registration, or a missing
record.
## What exists today (2026-10-09 review)
- `POST /v1/batch_check` takes several resources in one call and returns one
decision per resource, each with a `lifetime` (`expires_at`) per the decision
envelope. Shape-wise this is close to request (1).
- Caller auth authorizes the caller token against **every** `resource.system`
in the batch (`cmd/flex-auth/main.go`, `/v1/batch_check`). The
`flex-auth-user-engine` caller is bound to its own protected system, so a
readback across other systems is a 403 today. That is correct behaviour for
enforcement, and the reason this needs design rather than a config change.
- There is no generic "may use this application" action. Each package has its
own action vocabulary, so "access to system X" has no defined meaning yet.
- There is no registry read endpoint. The protected-system registry is loaded
from files and never served.
## Define the readback contract
```task
id: FLEX-WP-0035-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "0585a684-d462-5caa-937f-b1730efddbd8"
```
Decide the action that a readback evaluates per system: a declared
`application.access` action each consumer package must opt into, versus a
per-system mapping held in the registry. A system that declares nothing is
returned as `not_applicable`, never allow. State per input class the
revocation-visibility deadline the readback carries (§9.7). Decide whether the
readback is a decision for audit purposes (decision record, emission) or an
explicitly non-enforcing advisory read. A displayed allow must not be usable as
a PEP decision by another system.
Gate: written contract in `docs/` plus an ADR or decision record; reviewed with
user-engine before code.
2026-10-09: user-engine accepted the contract (message `f54df082`) with three
amendments, now folded in: the `/v1/check` subject shape with `tenant`, the
rendering table, and a separate `USER_ENGINE_READBACK_TOKEN_FILE`. Also added: a
realm-level-claims-only rule. `FLEX-DEC-2026-019` is accepted.
2026-10-09: activated by the founder. Draft contract
`docs/application-access-readback.md` and `FLEX-DEC-2026-019` (proposed). Key
finding: each pin loads one consumer's package, so no existing pin can answer
across applications. The draft proposes a dedicated readback pin with
multi-package mode, a `purpose: "readback"` binding that keeps decisions
non-transferable, and a new optional `client_binding` manifest field. Sent to
user-engine with four review questions. The gate closes on their reply.
## Caller authorization for cross-system readback
```task
id: FLEX-WP-0035-T02
status: done
priority: high
depends_on: [FLEX-WP-0035-T01]
state_hub_task_id: "eb0b6a91-7750-553b-b87f-c4262eb9df07"
```
Add a distinct caller capability (readback scope) instead of widening the
`flex-auth-user-engine` binding to other systems' check rights. The readback
caller must not be able to obtain a decision that another system's PEP would
accept, and its decisions must say so in the binding.
Gate: tests prove a readback-scoped token gets 403 on `/v1/check` for a foreign
system and is admitted only on the readback route.
2026-10-09 done. `flex-auth serve-readback` is a separate subcommand that mounts
no `/v1/check` or `/v1/batch_check` (404 there). `--readback-caller` is bound
under the non-system key `application-readback`. `CheckRequest.purpose` is
hashed into `request_digest`, `submitted_request_digest` and
`approval_binding_digest`, but only when set, so enforcement digests are
unchanged. `/v1/check` refuses a request that carries it. Tests:
`cmd/flex-auth/readback_test.go`
(`TestReadbackPrincipalCannotCheckOnEnforcementPin`,
`TestReadbackHTTPCallerAndRequestShape`, `TestReadbackWithholdsUncommittedAllow`)
and `pkg/api/purpose_test.go`.
## Readable protected-system registry
```task
id: FLEX-WP-0035-T03
status: done
priority: medium
depends_on: [FLEX-WP-0035-T01]
state_hub_task_id: "5dbb3280-8490-58a5-a0bb-f3883e568f58"
```
Serve a read-only projection: system id, display name, key-cape client binding.
Include the registry-snapshot digest so the catalogue is tied to the same
snapshot that decisions record (G1, `FLEX-WP-0019`). Grants and revocations stay
inside access-engine; user-domain admins get no grant surface from this work.
Gate: endpoint plus schema, admitted only for the readback caller, tests.
2026-10-09 done. `GET /v1/readback/systems`; optional `client_binding` on
`protected_system_manifest`. Schemas `readback_request`, `readback_response`
and `readback_systems` are checked against live service output
(`TestReadbackShapesMatchSchemas`). schemaguard gained `maxItems` for this.
## informed-decision declares `application.access`
```task
id: FLEX-WP-0035-T05
status: todo
priority: high
```
informed-decision is the first participant. Its `informed-decision.lifecycle`
package reads `authentication_audience`, which the readback must not use
(contract §3). Add an `application.access` rule over realm-level claims only,
as a new package version with fixtures. Coordinate the version bump with
informed-decision, because its own pin must run the same digest. Add
`client_binding` to its registry entry.
Gate: package valid with allow/deny fixtures, informed-decision agrees, and
the rule reads no audience, authorized-party or client-scoped claim.
## Deploy the readback pin
```task
id: FLEX-WP-0035-T04
status: wait
needs_human: true
depends_on: [FLEX-WP-0035-T05]
blocking_reason: "Live pin change on railiance01 needs founder go."
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "82a8a7e6-54e9-5262-a271-24ce2f161362"
```
Add `values/flex-auth-application-readback.yaml` (or a deploy manifest) for a
dedicated `flex-auth-application-readback` pin, plus a test asserting that its
package paths match each participant's own pin values (digest-equality, §4).
Add the user-engine ingress rule, then get the founder's go for the rollout.
The pin ships with the image that contains `serve-readback`. Hand user-engine
the evidence that unblocks `USER-WP-0026-T03`.