`ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD` is unique per date but not per repository, so any two repos
opening an ad-hoc on the same day collide. The 2026-08-26 fleet projection
reset refused 9 records for exactly this reason.
Canon (work-record-types_v0.1, CUST-WP-0066) settled the form as
`{PREFIX}-WP-ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD`, filename unchanged, and grandfathered existing
ids on the condition they are never *silently* re-derived. This is the explicit
migration that clause allows for.
The hub id is derived from the record id, so a changed id is a different
record: stale state_hub_*_id fields are dropped and fix-consistency re-derives.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 2583210@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: f2bff2d5-e9b2-4338-92ca-10282a927006
1.6 KiB
| id | type | title | domain | repo | status | owner | topic_slug | created | updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTIVITY-WP-ADHOC-2026-08-20 | workplan | Ad hoc — activity-core opportunistic fixes 2026-08-20 | infotech | activity-core | finished | codex | activity-core | 2026-08-20 | 2026-08-20 |
ACTIVITY-WP-ADHOC-2026-08-20 — activity-core opportunistic fixes
Reconcile the daily TODO review sink warning
id: ACTIVITY-WP-ADHOC-2026-08-20-T01
status: done
priority: low
The projected daily-todo-md-stale-review definition still said that
IssueSink defaulted to rest and that re-enabling the definition would
unconditionally recreate Forgejo issues. That warning described the state before
ACTIVITY-WP-0022 and contradicted the current code, deployment configuration,
and weekly-sbom-staleness definition.
Correct the warning to state that ISSUE_SINK_TYPE=state-hub is the safe fleet
default, rest is explicit opt-in, and State Hub progress is visibility rather
than claim authority. Keep the schedule disabled so a documentation correction
does not silently change production cadence, and document the operational checks
needed before it is deliberately re-enabled. Add a projection test so the stale
default rest claim cannot recur unnoticed.
Verification:
- Focused regression and IssueSink tests:
7 passed. - Full suite:
342 passed, 1 skipped, 4 failed. The four failures are unrelated existing inconsistencies: rules boundary allowlisting, the State Hub image pin assertion, a schedule-health response double missingstatus_code, and the sync-service expectation omitting the returnederrorscount.