Bernd's call: option C without the scoped-veto bridge. A veto would only
protect existing claim-bearing tiers and there are none, so not being live
is what makes the direct move safe. Records a named revisit trigger.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Draft-6 (net-kingdom 2744ce7) applies tenant-engine's review only; findings
1-5 all still stand. Adds two findings from draft-6 itself: off-ladder
notation (P-, R0/R1) with no declaration form, and no obligation to notify
dependent tiers when a delivering service downgrades its posture. Reframes
T06 to reuse draft-6's level-plus-named-exception grammar.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Responds to rapp-postgres review request on NetKingdom Tenancy Posture v0.1.
Covers posture-vector publication, an assurance-claims extension to the
canonical pricing schema, boundary validation, a tier-definition gate, and
the Q5/Q2 answers. Records five findings against the framework for
amendment while it is still proposed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
