Carry threshold evidence on issuance and use events
GH-DEC-2026-005 moved the distinct-approver check off the PEP onto this engine's valid_now. secrets-engine has implemented the split and reports it no longer verifies the threshold independently. Gate House accepted that as correct on layering AND as a genuine reduction in defence in depth, and named the compensating control: not a second check at the PEP, which is the duplication the split removes, but reconstructability at the issuer under §9.6. The emitted events could not support that. approval.issuance carried required_count but never who satisfied it, and approval.use carried no threshold evidence at all, so an auditor replaying the stream could not recompute the evaluation without reading live rows -- rows that may since have been superseded, revoked, or expired. Both events now carry a threshold object: required_count, distinct_approver_count, threshold_met, and approvers with approved_at plus assurance and evidence_ref when recorded. Tests prove reconstruction from the use row alone, and that the claim still discloses no approver identities -- they are evidence for audit-core, not consumer-facing, and the claim keeps disclosing the least it can. Writing the tests showed distinctness is already a storage invariant: entries is UNIQUE on (approval_id, subject_id), so a repeat approver is refused at insert and a separate entry_count could never differ from the distinct count. Dropped that field rather than ship a number that cannot vary, and the test now asserts the refusal instead. 88 tests pass (4 new). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TvyJPAaVCGsVheVhcCwNND Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 411227@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: d566f6d3-bcaf-43c3-bc5e-3ddd0f64b535
This commit is contained in:
parent
48ffc34993
commit
87e55e2bca
4 changed files with 163 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -211,3 +211,15 @@ stands as published.** `APPROVAL-IN-0002` is closed. T05 remains `wait` on T03
|
|||
deployment plus the secrets-engine validator split and its
|
||||
`secrets-engine-approval` KeyCape registration (already requested verbatim in
|
||||
`docs/keycape-service-registrations.md`).
|
||||
|
||||
2026-09-06 follow-on (T01): `GH-DEC-2026-005` assigned this engine a
|
||||
compensating obligation. secrets-engine has implemented the split and reports
|
||||
it no longer verifies the distinct-approver threshold independently; Gate House
|
||||
accepted that as correct on layering and as a real reduction in defence in
|
||||
depth, requiring instead that the threshold evaluation be reconstructable from
|
||||
this engine's state transitions and its use outbox row under §9.6. Implemented:
|
||||
`approval.issuance` and `approval.use` now carry a `threshold` object
|
||||
(`required_count`, `distinct_approver_count`, `threshold_met`, and `approvers`
|
||||
with `approved_at` plus assurance/evidence refs). Tests prove reconstruction
|
||||
from the use row alone and that the claim still discloses no approver
|
||||
identities. Documented in `docs/outbox-contract.md`.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue