ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-T02: verify literature comparison
All bibliographic entries checked by web search (verification log added); details corrected and completed; AI-growth prior art added (Aghion/Jones/ Jones; Trammell & Korinek; Davidson et al.); novelty claim 2 narrowed to lineage/membrane governance coupled to domination, agency and commons. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1494246@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: caf6de6f-f9e4-47ce-a584-49baa271fa4b
This commit is contained in:
parent
144d6b78fc
commit
bd62ace7de
4 changed files with 97 additions and 41 deletions
|
|
@ -2,12 +2,20 @@
|
|||
# Custodian Brief — assembly-economics
|
||||
|
||||
**Domain:** communication
|
||||
**Last synced:** 2026-10-11 22:36 UTC
|
||||
**Last synced:** 2026-10-11 23:37 UTC
|
||||
**State Hub:** http://127.0.0.1:8000 *(adjust if running on a remote machine)*
|
||||
|
||||
## Active Workstreams
|
||||
|
||||
*(none — repo may need first-session setup)*
|
||||
### GADM-0.3: global sensitivity, power channels, cohorts
|
||||
Progress: 1/6 done | workplan_id: `23e33ee7-cb27-52bc-819c-704f44f91663`
|
||||
|
||||
**Open tasks:**
|
||||
- · Verify the literature comparison `5c77c522`
|
||||
- · Power channels as sub-stocks `274ce388`
|
||||
- · Separate wealth from power `99e702d7`
|
||||
- · Strengthen attention dynamics and the full organism grid `f56e20b4`
|
||||
- · Life-cycle cohorts `2b749127`
|
||||
|
||||
## Inbox Hygiene
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
|
|||
| workplan | ASSEMBLY-WP-0002 | finished | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0002-concept-promotion.md |
|
||||
| workplan | ASSEMBLY-WP-0003 | finished | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0003-seed-integration.md |
|
||||
| workplan | ASSEMBLY-WP-0004 | finished | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0004-gadm-0.2-modeling.md |
|
||||
| workplan | ASSEMBLY-WP-0005 | proposed | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-gadm-0.3.md |
|
||||
| workplan | ASSEMBLY-WP-0005 | active | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-gadm-0.3.md |
|
||||
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0001-T01 | done | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md |
|
||||
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0001-T02 | done | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md |
|
||||
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0001-T03 | done | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md |
|
||||
|
|
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
|
|||
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0004-T07 | done | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0004-gadm-0.2-modeling.md |
|
||||
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0004-T08 | done | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0004-gadm-0.2-modeling.md |
|
||||
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0004-T09 | done | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0004-gadm-0.2-modeling.md |
|
||||
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-T01 | todo | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-gadm-0.3.md |
|
||||
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-T01 | done | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-gadm-0.3.md |
|
||||
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-T02 | todo | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-gadm-0.3.md |
|
||||
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-T03 | todo | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-gadm-0.3.md |
|
||||
| task | ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-T04 | todo | — | workplans/ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-gadm-0.3.md |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
|
|||
<!--
|
||||
Created 2026-10-12 under ASSEMBLY-WP-0004-T09 (INTENT.md next step 10).
|
||||
Written from general knowledge, without a literature search in this session.
|
||||
Bibliographic details are given as commonly cited, but must be verified
|
||||
against the sources before any citation in published work.
|
||||
Written from general knowledge; bibliographic details verified by web search
|
||||
on 2026-10-12 under ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-T02 (see § 9, Verification log).
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
# Literature Comparison v0.1
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** first orientation map. **Bibliographic details are unverified.**
|
||||
Check each entry against the original before citing it.
|
||||
**Status:** orientation map v0.2. Bibliographic details verified by web
|
||||
search (§ 9). The content summaries are still the author's reading, and must be
|
||||
checked against the texts before they are relied on.
|
||||
|
||||
Purpose: place the Generative Assembly Society framework, GADM and the
|
||||
information-organism lens relative to existing work, so that the project
|
||||
|
|
@ -24,54 +24,62 @@ borrow.
|
|||
|
||||
| Work | Overlap | Difference | Borrow |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **Assembly Theory** (L. Cronin, S. I. Walker and colleagues; e.g. Sharma et al., *Nature* 2023) | Objects as assemblies built from reusable components; selection as the source of complex objects | A physical and chemical theory with a measurable assembly index. INTENT.md explicitly does not require accepting it. | The idea of quantifying "assembly depth" as a reuse measure for X |
|
||||
| **The adjacent possible** (S. Kauffman, *Investigations*, 2000) | Future combinations reachable from current components ≈ viable future assembly space | Biological and theoretical, not institutional | Vocabulary for reachable futures; combinatorial growth arguments |
|
||||
| **Technology as combination** (W. B. Arthur, *The Nature of Technology*, 2009) | Technologies built from existing technologies; recursive composition | Descriptive history of technology, no institutional model | Evidence for R1 (generative reuse) |
|
||||
| **Economic complexity** (C. Hidalgo & R. Hausmann, e.g. *PNAS* 2009; *The Atlas of Economic Complexity*) | Capabilities as recombinable building blocks; diversity × ubiquity | Measures national capability structures from trade data | Empirical proxies for N and X |
|
||||
| **Assembly Theory** (A. Sharma, D. Czégel, M. Lachmann, C. P. Kempes, S. I. Walker, L. Cronin, "Assembly theory explains and quantifies selection and evolution", *Nature* 622: 321–328, 2023, doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06600-9) | Objects as assemblies built from reusable components; selection as the source of complex objects | A physical and chemical theory with a measurable assembly index. INTENT.md explicitly does not require accepting it. | The idea of quantifying "assembly depth" as a reuse measure for X |
|
||||
| **The adjacent possible** (S. A. Kauffman, *Investigations*, Oxford University Press, 2000) | Future combinations reachable from current components ≈ viable future assembly space | Biological and theoretical, not institutional | Vocabulary for reachable futures; combinatorial growth arguments |
|
||||
| **Technology as combination** (W. B. Arthur, *The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves*, Free Press, 2009; UK: Allen Lane) | Technologies built from existing technologies; recursive composition | Descriptive history of technology, no institutional model | Evidence for R1 (generative reuse) |
|
||||
| **Economic complexity** (C. A. Hidalgo & R. Hausmann, "The building blocks of economic complexity", *PNAS* 106(26): 10570–10575, 2009) | Capabilities as recombinable building blocks; diversity × ubiquity | Measures national capability structures from trade data | Empirical proxies for N and X |
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Agency, capability and freedom
|
||||
|
||||
| Work | Overlap | Difference | Borrow |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **Capability approach** (A. Sen, *Development as Freedom*, 1999; M. Nussbaum) | Effective agency as reachable functionings, not formal liberty | Normative development framework, no dynamic model | Operationalization of G; lists of central capabilities |
|
||||
| **Real freedom / basic income** (P. Van Parijs, *Real Freedom for All*, 1995) | Existence principle; participation decoupled from labor | Focused on income; does not model domination or commons | Arguments for D_s and the Existence principle |
|
||||
| **Republican non-domination** (P. Pettit, *Republicanism*, 1997) | Domination as capacity for arbitrary interference, separate from wealth | Political philosophy | Conceptual grounding for modeling P separately from wealth |
|
||||
| **Capability approach** (A. Sen, *Development as Freedom*, Knopf, 1999; M. Nussbaum, no specific work cited yet) | Effective agency as reachable functionings, not formal liberty | Normative development framework, no dynamic model | Operationalization of G; lists of central capabilities |
|
||||
| **Real freedom / basic income** (P. Van Parijs, *Real Freedom for All: What (if Anything) Can Justify Capitalism?*, Clarendon Press / Oxford University Press, 1995) | Existence principle; participation decoupled from labor | Focused on income; does not model domination or commons | Arguments for D_s and the Existence principle |
|
||||
| **Republican non-domination** (P. Pettit, *Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government*, Clarendon Press / Oxford University Press, 1997) | Domination as capacity for arbitrary interference, separate from wealth | Political philosophy | Conceptual grounding for modeling P separately from wealth |
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Commons, institutions and power
|
||||
|
||||
| Work | Overlap | Difference | Borrow |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **Governing the commons** (E. Ostrom, 1990) | Commons as institutions; polycentric governance | Natural-resource commons. Assembly commons are mostly non-rival. | Design principles for commons governance (WS-06, WS-11) |
|
||||
| **Commons-based peer production** (Y. Benkler, *The Wealth of Networks*, 2006) | Non-rival knowledge commons; open source | Network economy, pre-AI | Evidence for ρ and I_X mechanisms |
|
||||
| **Inclusive vs. extractive institutions** (D. Acemoglu & J. Robinson, *Why Nations Fail*, 2012) | Institutional configurations determine whether success broadens or closes access | Historical, macro-institutional | Framing for the R3 / B1 loop (success becomes control) |
|
||||
| **Capital concentration** (T. Piketty, *Capital in the Twenty-First Century*, 2014) | Concentration of returns when r > g | Wealth-focused | Data and dynamics for W_c in the GADM-0.3 power extension |
|
||||
| **Entrepreneurial state** (M. Mazzucato, 2013) | Public risk-bearing in innovation | Focused on the state | Evidence for public risk pools (F) |
|
||||
| **Governing the commons** (E. Ostrom, *Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action*, Cambridge University Press, 1990) | Commons as institutions; polycentric governance | Natural-resource commons. Assembly commons are mostly non-rival. | Design principles for commons governance (WS-06, WS-11) |
|
||||
| **Commons-based peer production** (Y. Benkler, *The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom*, Yale University Press, 2006) | Non-rival knowledge commons; open source | Network economy, pre-AI | Evidence for ρ and I_X mechanisms |
|
||||
| **Inclusive vs. extractive institutions** (D. Acemoglu & J. A. Robinson, *Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty*, Crown, 2012) | Institutional configurations determine whether success broadens or closes access | Historical, macro-institutional | Framing for the R3 / B1 loop (success becomes control) |
|
||||
| **Capital concentration** (T. Piketty, *Capital in the Twenty-First Century*, trans. A. Goldhammer, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014; French original Seuil, 2013) | Concentration of returns when r > g | Wealth-focused | Data and dynamics for W_c in the GADM-0.3 power extension |
|
||||
| **Entrepreneurial state** (M. Mazzucato, *The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths*, Anthem Press, 2013) | Public risk-bearing in innovation | Focused on the state | Evidence for public risk pools (F) |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Automation and distribution
|
||||
|
||||
| Work | Overlap | Difference | Borrow |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **Task-based automation** (D. Acemoglu & P. Restrepo, e.g. "Automation and New Tasks", *Journal of Economic Perspectives*, 2019) | Automation displaces tasks, new tasks reinstate labor | Labor-market focus, assumes wage-based participation | Labor share dynamics for w_L |
|
||||
| **AI and income distribution** (A. Korinek & J. Stiglitz, NBER working paper, 2017) | Redistribution needs when automation concentrates returns | Standard welfare economics | Distribution regimes for claims I |
|
||||
| **Task-based automation** (D. Acemoglu & P. Restrepo, "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor", *Journal of Economic Perspectives* 33(2): 3–30, 2019, doi:10.1257/jep.33.2.3) | Automation displaces tasks, new tasks reinstate labor | Labor-market focus, assumes wage-based participation | Labor share dynamics for w_L |
|
||||
| **AI and economic growth** (P. Aghion, B. F. Jones & C. I. Jones, "Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth", NBER Working Paper 23928, 2017) | AI as the latest stage of automation, with capital taking over a growing range of tasks; growth limited by essential tasks that are hard to improve (Baumol) | Growth and factor shares; no domination, commons or attention | Bottleneck logic for which stocks constrain V and Y* |
|
||||
| **AI and income distribution** (A. Korinek & J. E. Stiglitz, "Artificial Intelligence and Its Implications for Income Distribution and Unemployment", NBER Working Paper 24174, 2017; chapter in Agrawal, Gans & Goldfarb (eds.), *The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda*) | Redistribution needs when automation concentrates returns | Standard welfare economics | Distribution regimes for claims I |
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.1 AI as self-improving capital (prior art for § 7, claim 2)
|
||||
|
||||
| Work | Overlap | Difference | Borrow |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **Transformative-AI growth** (P. Trammell & A. Korinek, "Economic Growth under Transformative AI", CEPR Discussion Paper DP18780; SSRN 4616883) | AI lets capital "self-replicate" (raise output) and "self-improve" (raise knowledge production): close to K_Ω's learning with use | Growth-theoretic; ownership, membranes, lineage governance and agency are outside the model | Formal treatment of self-improving capital, a check on R7 |
|
||||
| **Automating AI research** (T. Davidson, B. Halperin, T. Houlden & A. Korinek, "When Does Automating AI Research Produce Explosive Growth?", NBER Working Paper 35155) | Semi-endogenous growth with AI automation, where capital accumulation and technical progress reinforce each other | Focus on explosive growth; no distribution or power channels | Conditions under which R7 becomes explosive, relevant to the natural-monopoly question |
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Systems, cybernetics and viability
|
||||
|
||||
| Work | Overlap | Difference | Borrow |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **System dynamics** (J. Forrester, *Industrial Dynamics*, 1961; D. Meadows et al., *The Limits to Growth*, 1972) | Stock-and-flow modeling, feedback loops | GADM is a direct descendant in method | Method: causal-loop diagrams, stock-flow conventions, validation practice |
|
||||
| **Requisite variety** (W. R. Ashby, *An Introduction to Cybernetics*, 1956) | A regulator needs as much variety as what it regulates; the membrane as variety filter | Abstract cybernetics | Theoretical basis for membrane design |
|
||||
| **Viable System Model** (S. Beer, *Brain of the Firm*, 1972) | Viability, recursion, regulation of organizations | Organizational cybernetics, not learning systems | Recursion and viability vocabulary for the AIPN and the organism lens |
|
||||
| **Resilience and panarchy** (C. S. Holling; L. Gunderson & C. S. Holling, *Panarchy*, 2002) | Adaptive cycles, release and reorganization ≈ disassemble/reassemble | Ecological systems | Adaptive-cycle framing for transition dynamics (WS-12) |
|
||||
| **Planetary boundaries** (J. Rockström et al., *Nature*, 2009) | Non-tradeable ecological floors | Earth-system science | Grounding for the E floor |
|
||||
| **Doughnut economics** (K. Raworth, 2017) | Social floor plus ecological ceiling as a viability corridor | No dynamic model of generativity | Corridor framing for constitutional constraints |
|
||||
| **System dynamics** (J. W. Forrester, *Industrial Dynamics*, MIT Press, 1961; D. H. Meadows, D. L. Meadows, J. Randers & W. W. Behrens III, *The Limits to Growth*, 1972, a Club of Rome report built on the World3 model) | Stock-and-flow modeling, feedback loops | GADM is a direct descendant in method | Method: causal-loop diagrams, stock-flow conventions, validation practice |
|
||||
| **Requisite variety** (W. R. Ashby, *An Introduction to Cybernetics*, Chapman & Hall, 1956) | A regulator needs as much variety as what it regulates; the membrane as variety filter | Abstract cybernetics | Theoretical basis for membrane design |
|
||||
| **Viable System Model** (S. Beer, *Brain of the Firm*, Allen Lane, 1972; 2nd ed. Wiley, 1981) | Viability, recursion, regulation of organizations | Organizational cybernetics, not learning systems | Recursion and viability vocabulary for the AIPN and the organism lens |
|
||||
| **Resilience and panarchy** (L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (eds.), *Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems*, Island Press, 2002) | Adaptive cycles, release and reorganization ≈ disassemble/reassemble | Ecological systems | Adaptive-cycle framing for transition dynamics (WS-12) |
|
||||
| **Planetary boundaries** (J. Rockström et al., "A safe operating space for humanity", *Nature* 461: 472–475, 2009, doi:10.1038/461472a; full version in *Ecology and Society* 14(2): 32, 2009) | Non-tradeable ecological floors | Earth-system science | Grounding for the E floor |
|
||||
| **Doughnut economics** (K. Raworth, *Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist*, Chelsea Green, 2017; UK: Random House Business) | Social floor plus ecological ceiling as a viability corridor | No dynamic model of generativity | Corridor framing for constitutional constraints |
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Attention
|
||||
|
||||
| Work | Overlap | Difference | Borrow |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **H. A. Simon**, "Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World" (1971) | "A wealth of information creates a poverty of attention" | Organizational design | Founding statement of attention as the scarce resource |
|
||||
| **Attention economy** (T. Davenport & J. Beck, *The Attention Economy*, 2001) | Attention as an economic resource | Managerial, treats attention as something to capture | Contrast case for x_att |
|
||||
| **Surveillance capitalism** (S. Zuboff, 2019) | Extraction-funded attention, discovery concentration | Critical, not modeled | Scenario grounding for the attention-oligopoly regime |
|
||||
| **H. A. Simon**, "Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World", in M. Greenberger (ed.), *Computers, Communications, and the Public Interest*, Johns Hopkins Press, 1971 | "A wealth of information creates a poverty of attention" | Organizational design | Founding statement of attention as the scarce resource |
|
||||
| **Attention economy** (T. H. Davenport & J. C. Beck, *The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business*, Harvard Business School Press, 2001) | Attention as an economic resource | Managerial, treats attention as something to capture | Contrast case for x_att |
|
||||
| **Surveillance capitalism** (S. Zuboff, *The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power*, PublicAffairs, 2019) | Extraction-funded attention, discovery concentration | Critical, not modeled | Scenario grounding for the attention-oligopoly regime |
|
||||
| **Goodhart's law / Campbell's law** | Metric gaming | — | Basis for the metrics catalog's Goodhart risks |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
@ -83,10 +91,12 @@ To be confirmed by an actual literature search:
|
|||
1. **Generativity as the objective.** Using *viable future assembly space*
|
||||
(rather than welfare, output or capability sets alone) as the target of
|
||||
institutional design.
|
||||
2. **Information organisms as a distinct capital class**, with learning
|
||||
with use, lineage inheritance, membranes and metabolism, coupled into a
|
||||
macro model. Related work treats AI as automation capital or as a labor
|
||||
substitute.
|
||||
2. **Information organisms as a governed capital class.** *Revised after
|
||||
T02:* self-improving AI capital is established in growth theory (§ 4.1),
|
||||
so learning with use is not new. What appears new is coupling it to
|
||||
**lineage inheritance, membranes and their ownership**, and feeding those
|
||||
into domination, agency and commons stocks rather than only into output
|
||||
and factor shares.
|
||||
3. **Membrane and lineage control as domination channels**, separate from
|
||||
wealth.
|
||||
4. **Attention headroom as a stock inside a macro diagnostic**, with an
|
||||
|
|
@ -94,9 +104,47 @@ To be confirmed by an actual literature search:
|
|||
|
||||
## 8. Next steps
|
||||
|
||||
- Run a real literature search (WS-01, WS-07, WS-14 priorities) and verify
|
||||
the bibliographic details above.
|
||||
- Look specifically for prior macro models that treat AI systems as
|
||||
learning, inheritable capital; any such work would affect claim 2.
|
||||
- Read the § 4.1 papers in full, and check whether any of them model
|
||||
ownership concentration of AI capital (this would narrow claim 2 further).
|
||||
- Run a topical literature search for WS-01, WS-07 and WS-14 (assembly
|
||||
ontology, power, attention) beyond this orientation map.
|
||||
- Review system-dynamics validation practice (e.g. structure-verification
|
||||
and extreme-condition tests) and apply it to GADM-0.2.
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Verification log
|
||||
|
||||
Verified 2026-10-12 by web search (catalogue records, publisher or journal
|
||||
pages). ✓ = author, title, venue and year confirmed. ◐ = partly confirmed.
|
||||
— = nothing specific to verify.
|
||||
|
||||
| Entry | Status | Note |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Sharma et al. 2023 (Assembly theory) | ✓ | *Nature* 622: 321–328 |
|
||||
| Kauffman 2000 | ✓ | |
|
||||
| Arthur 2009 | ✓ | Free Press (US), Allen Lane (UK) |
|
||||
| Hidalgo & Hausmann 2009 | ✓ | *PNAS* 106(26) |
|
||||
| Sen 1999 | ✓ | Knopf (US); Oxford edition also exists |
|
||||
| Nussbaum | — | no specific work cited |
|
||||
| Van Parijs 1995 | ✓ | |
|
||||
| Pettit 1997 | ✓ | |
|
||||
| Ostrom 1990 | ✓ | |
|
||||
| Benkler 2006 | ✓ | |
|
||||
| Acemoglu & Robinson 2012 | ✓ | |
|
||||
| Piketty 2014 | ✓ | English translation; French original 2013 |
|
||||
| Mazzucato 2013 | ✓ | |
|
||||
| Acemoglu & Restrepo 2019 | ✓ | *JEP* 33(2): 3–30 |
|
||||
| Korinek & Stiglitz 2017 | ✓ | NBER WP 24174 |
|
||||
| Aghion, Jones & Jones 2017 | ✓ | added in T02 |
|
||||
| Trammell & Korinek | ✓ | added in T02; CEPR DP18780 |
|
||||
| Davidson, Halperin, Houlden & Korinek | ✓ | added in T02; NBER WP 35155 |
|
||||
| Forrester 1961 | ✓ | MIT Press |
|
||||
| Meadows et al. 1972 | ✓ | |
|
||||
| Ashby 1956 | ✓ | Chapman & Hall |
|
||||
| Beer 1972 | ◐ | year and later Wiley edition confirmed; first-edition publisher from a secondary listing (Allen Lane) |
|
||||
| Gunderson & Holling 2002 | ✓ | Island Press; some listings date it 2001 |
|
||||
| Rockström et al. 2009 | ✓ | *Nature* 461: 472–475 |
|
||||
| Raworth 2017 | ✓ | |
|
||||
| Simon 1971 | ✓ | in Greenberger (ed.) |
|
||||
| Davenport & Beck 2001 | ✓ | |
|
||||
| Zuboff 2019 | ✓ | |
|
||||
| Goodhart / Campbell | — | cited as named laws only |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ the "reuse as a bundle" interaction.
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: ASSEMBLY-WP-0005-T02
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "5c77c522-9aa8-5bde-9e7f-c0a5cf51a3f5"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue