Add company canon v0 and bootstrap workplan
Canon: INTENT, CompanyReactivationPlan, EcosystemMap, AutonomyPolicy, SuccessMilestones, OfferCatalog, DogfoodPolicy, ControlLoopCatalog, DecisionQueue, OfficeHourQueue, RiskRegister, plus founding exploration in history/. Workplan BNKY-WP-0001 covers canon ratification, the first internal audit, ecosystem cartography, flagship offer, and operating rhythm. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
67d735ddec
commit
d6d5cf1a1d
11 changed files with 698 additions and 0 deletions
104
AutonomyPolicy.md
Normal file
104
AutonomyPolicy.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
|
||||||
|
# Autonomy Policy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Status: draft v0.1 — 2026-07-16. Governs what agents may do without the
|
||||||
|
> founder. In force once ratified. The operating rule: **"ask Bernd" is never
|
||||||
|
> the default.**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## The rule
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> If the founder is unavailable, the system must either continue safely,
|
||||||
|
> prepare the next decision, or explicitly defer with evidence. It must not
|
||||||
|
> silently idle.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Valid states: `proceeding` | `prepared for review` | `deferred by policy`.
|
||||||
|
Invalid state: `waiting because unsure`. Uncertainty triggers research,
|
||||||
|
comparison, preparation, or risk classification — not paralysis.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Autonomy lanes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Lane | Name | Agent may | Human needed? |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| **Green** | Safe autonomous | Research, summarize, classify, draft, organize, test, prepare | No |
|
||||||
|
| **Blue** | Reversible execution | Internal docs, backlog updates, local scripts, reports, local commits | No, but logged |
|
||||||
|
| **Yellow** | Deferred approval | Prepare external emails, invoices, offers, releases, payments | Yes, async via decision queue |
|
||||||
|
| **Orange** | Time-window approval | Customer/legal/accounting/banking actions needing business hours | Yes, on office-hour days |
|
||||||
|
| **Red** | Human-only | Signing, strategic commitments, bank changes, sensitive legal/HR/security | Always |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Optimization target: maximize Green+Blue throughput, queue Yellow, batch
|
||||||
|
Orange into office-hour days, protect Red from automation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Default policies
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Research:** if uncertain, collect evidence and produce a comparison. Ask
|
||||||
|
only if ambiguity changes risk or external commitment.
|
||||||
|
- **Documentation:** agents may create/improve internal markdown freely; must
|
||||||
|
preserve provenance and mark assumptions.
|
||||||
|
- **Email:** draft freely; send only pre-approved low-risk routine categories.
|
||||||
|
Pricing, commitments, complaints, contracts, legal → decision queue.
|
||||||
|
- **Spending:** recommend freely; never spend outside approved recurring
|
||||||
|
budgets or explicit thresholds.
|
||||||
|
- **Product:** refine specs, use cases, architecture, backlog freely; strategic
|
||||||
|
direction is never final without founder approval.
|
||||||
|
- **Code:** branches, tests, prototypes, docs, local commits freely; no
|
||||||
|
production deploys without policy-approved checks.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Approval packages
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
When an agent hits a lane boundary it prepares a complete decision package,
|
||||||
|
not a bare question:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
decision: ""
|
||||||
|
recommended_action: ""
|
||||||
|
reason: ""
|
||||||
|
evidence: []
|
||||||
|
risk_level: yellow
|
||||||
|
reversibility: low | medium | high
|
||||||
|
deadline: ""
|
||||||
|
attention_cost: "15 min"
|
||||||
|
fallback_if_no_approval: ""
|
||||||
|
options: [approve, reject, revise, defer]
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Founder attention budget
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
daily_attention_budget:
|
||||||
|
available_minutes: 90 # typical of the 1–3 h window
|
||||||
|
max_decisions_per_day: 7
|
||||||
|
max_deep_topics_per_day: 1
|
||||||
|
interaction_style: [concise briefs, approve/reject options, evidence links]
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Founder availability is first-class state
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
founder_availability:
|
||||||
|
state: available | evening_window | unavailable | office_hour_day
|
||||||
|
allowed_escalation_when_unavailable:
|
||||||
|
- critical security incident
|
||||||
|
- payment failure
|
||||||
|
- legal deadline
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
On return from absence, agents produce a **Return Brief**: what changed, what
|
||||||
|
progressed, what waits, what went stale, what risks increased, recommended
|
||||||
|
decisions for today.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Initial autonomy thresholds
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Area | Autonomous? | Limit |
|
||||||
|
| --- | ---: | --- |
|
||||||
|
| Internal docs | Yes | Preserve previous versions |
|
||||||
|
| Research | Yes | Cite/store sources |
|
||||||
|
| Backlog refinement | Yes | Propose, don't delete major items |
|
||||||
|
| Code prototypes | Yes | Branch only, no production deploy |
|
||||||
|
| Customer emails | Draft only | Send after approval |
|
||||||
|
| Social/publishing | Draft only | Publish after approval |
|
||||||
|
| Payments | No | Prepare only |
|
||||||
|
| Contracts | No | Analyze/draft only |
|
||||||
|
| Security changes | Mostly no | Prepare/test only |
|
||||||
|
| Cloud infra | Limited | Non-production only |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Raise autonomy per area only after the system proves reliable there, by
|
||||||
|
explicit founder decision recorded in `DecisionQueue.md`.
|
||||||
63
CompanyReactivationPlan.md
Normal file
63
CompanyReactivationPlan.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
||||||
|
# Company Reactivation Plan
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Status: draft v0.1 — 2026-07-16. Turns the dormant legal shell (founded 2019)
|
||||||
|
> into an operating company. Phase model from `history/260715-InitialExploration.md`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Phase overview
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Phase | Name | Goal | Status |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| 0 | Dormant legal shell | — | current |
|
||||||
|
| 1 | Reactivation | Administratively alive, clean, compliant, usable | **next** |
|
||||||
|
| 2 | Operating company | First offers sold and delivered | planned |
|
||||||
|
| 3 | Ecosystem provider | Provider of Coulomb / Net Kingdom / Railiance products | planned |
|
||||||
|
| 4 | Operational Knowledge GmbH | Rename when identity has caught up with mission | planned |
|
||||||
|
| 5 | OK-level ambition | Category-defining; ok.com becomes rational | north star |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Phase 1 checklist — Reactivation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Each item needs: current-state evidence, required action, owner (Bernd /
|
||||||
|
accountant / bank / agent-preparable), and autonomy lane.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Legal & registry
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Verify Handelsregister entry, registered address, Geschäftsführer details are current
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Locate articles of association and shareholder documents; file in evidence store
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Review company purpose (Unternehmensgegenstand) — is it compatible with the OK mission? (Red lane: change requires notary)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Tax & accounting
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Establish accountant relationship (or confirm existing one) — Orange lane
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Confirm status of past filings (annual accounts, corporate tax, VAT) — identify any arrears
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Set up bookkeeping workflow (invoice inbox → ledger → evidence)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Banking & finance
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Confirm business bank account state and access — Red lane for changes
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Inventory current costs, subscriptions, and obligations
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Establish cash/runway view (Finance Steward loop)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Digital presence
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Domains: inventory owned domains, decide primary company domain
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Company email on own domain
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Minimal website: one page stating what the company does (transition wording below)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Contracts & IP
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Inventory existing contracts and obligations
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Clarify IP ownership: which repos/assets belong to the GmbH vs. Bernd privately — needed before selling ecosystem products
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Contract templates (NDA, service agreement) — draft lane only
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Internal governance
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Company canon in this repo (this document set) — v0 done, founder ratification pending
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Decision records started (`DecisionQueue.md`)
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Autonomy policy in force (`AutonomyPolicy.md`)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Transition wording (external, during Phases 1–3)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Binky Hedgehog GmbH develops operational knowledge infrastructure for
|
||||||
|
> agentic, secure, and self-improving organizations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## First internal deliverable
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Binky Operational Knowledge Audit v0** — run the company's own flagship
|
||||||
|
offer on itself: assess legal, tax, banking, domains, email, contracts,
|
||||||
|
products, repos, IP ownership, obligations, costs, revenue paths, assets,
|
||||||
|
missing capabilities, risks. Output feeds this checklist, the
|
||||||
|
`RiskRegister.md`, and becomes the reusable audit template (dogfood evidence).
|
||||||
75
ControlLoopCatalog.md
Normal file
75
ControlLoopCatalog.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
|
||||||
|
# Control Loop Catalog
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Status: draft v0.1 — 2026-07-16. The company modeled as control loops:
|
||||||
|
> Sense → Interpret → Decide → Act → Record → Learn. Six initial loops; expand
|
||||||
|
> as operations grow.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Loop 1: Company Reactivation Loop
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
Sense: unresolved legal/admin/tax/company setup issues
|
||||||
|
Interpret: classify blockers, deadlines, external dependencies
|
||||||
|
Decide: what must be handled by Bernd / accountant / legal / bank
|
||||||
|
Act: prepare documents, emails, appointments, checklists
|
||||||
|
Record: decisions, evidence, status (CompanyReactivationPlan.md)
|
||||||
|
Learn: update reactivation playbook
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
Lanes: mostly Green/Blue preparation; execution Orange/Red. Maturity: L1.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Loop 2: Ecosystem Cartography Loop
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
Sense: repos, notes, documents, project ideas
|
||||||
|
Interpret: classify into Coulomb / Net Kingdom / Railiance / other
|
||||||
|
Decide: maturity, product relevance, next action
|
||||||
|
Act: update registries and maps (EcosystemMap.md)
|
||||||
|
Record: capability entries
|
||||||
|
Learn: improve classification standard
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
Lanes: Green/Blue. Maturity: L1.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Loop 3: Dogfood Loop
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
See `DogfoodPolicy.md`. Lanes: Green/Blue internally. Maturity: L1.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Loop 4: Offer Formation Loop
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
Sense: capability + market pain + proof
|
||||||
|
Interpret: package into offer
|
||||||
|
Decide: target customer and promise (founder for direction)
|
||||||
|
Act: draft offer page, outreach, proposal
|
||||||
|
Record: OfferCatalog.md and validation evidence
|
||||||
|
Learn: adjust pricing/scope
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
Lanes: Green drafting; publishing Yellow. Maturity: L1.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Loop 5: Revenue Development Loop
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
Sense: leads, conversations, opportunities
|
||||||
|
Interpret: fit, urgency, ability to pay
|
||||||
|
Decide: pursue / nurture / ignore
|
||||||
|
Act: prepare outreach and proposals
|
||||||
|
Record: CRM/evidence
|
||||||
|
Learn: improve segment focus
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
Lanes: Green research; outreach Yellow. Maturity: L0.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Loop 6: Founder Attention Loop
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
Sense: available time and decision backlog
|
||||||
|
Interpret: highest-leverage use of the next 1–3 hours
|
||||||
|
Decide: what Bernd should review now
|
||||||
|
Act: present decision packages (DecisionQueue.md)
|
||||||
|
Record: decisions and new policies
|
||||||
|
Learn: reduce future attention cost
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
Lanes: Green/Blue. Maturity: L1. **This loop is the keystone.**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Automation maturity levels
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
L0 Manual · L1 Assisted · L2 Structured · L3 Recommended · L4 Supervised
|
||||||
|
execution · L5 Conditional autonomy · L6 Closed-loop optimization ·
|
||||||
|
L7 Auditable subsystem
|
||||||
46
DecisionQueue.md
Normal file
46
DecisionQueue.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||||
|
# Decision Queue
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Status: live document — decisions awaiting the founder, as prepared
|
||||||
|
> approval packages (`AutonomyPolicy.md`). Agents append; Bernd resolves.
|
||||||
|
> Resolved decisions move to the log below with outcome and date.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Item template
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
id: DEC-2026-NNN
|
||||||
|
title: ""
|
||||||
|
lane: yellow | orange | red
|
||||||
|
status: prepared | resolved | deferred
|
||||||
|
created_at: ""
|
||||||
|
needed_by: ""
|
||||||
|
attention_cost: ""
|
||||||
|
agent_recommendation: ""
|
||||||
|
evidence: []
|
||||||
|
options: [approve, reject, revise, defer]
|
||||||
|
fallback_if_no_response: ""
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Open decisions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### DEC-2026-001 — Ratify company canon v0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
id: DEC-2026-001
|
||||||
|
title: "Ratify company canon v0 (INTENT, AutonomyPolicy, and companion docs)"
|
||||||
|
lane: red
|
||||||
|
status: prepared
|
||||||
|
created_at: "2026-07-16"
|
||||||
|
needed_by: "2026-07-23"
|
||||||
|
attention_cost: "30 min"
|
||||||
|
agent_recommendation: "Review INTENT.md and AutonomyPolicy.md closely (they govern everything else); skim the rest. Approve with edits."
|
||||||
|
evidence:
|
||||||
|
- INTENT.md
|
||||||
|
- AutonomyPolicy.md
|
||||||
|
- history/260715-InitialExploration.md
|
||||||
|
options: [approve, reject, revise, defer]
|
||||||
|
fallback_if_no_response: "Canon stays draft; agents operate under conservative lane defaults; no external-facing artifacts produced."
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Resolved decisions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*(append resolved items here: id, title, outcome, date, evidence)*
|
||||||
46
DogfoodPolicy.md
Normal file
46
DogfoodPolicy.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||||
|
# Dogfood Policy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Status: draft v0.1 — 2026-07-16. How internal operations become product
|
||||||
|
> evidence. Dogfooding is the metabolism of the OK Flywheel.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Policy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **Every internal operational pain is a product signal.** Before buying or
|
||||||
|
hand-rolling a one-off solution, check whether an ecosystem capability can
|
||||||
|
solve it (`EcosystemMap.md`).
|
||||||
|
2. **Every internal solution is documented as evidence**: before/after state,
|
||||||
|
capability used, effort, outcome, reusable pattern, product implication.
|
||||||
|
3. **The company sells nothing it hasn't run on itself** where feasible — the
|
||||||
|
Operational Knowledge Audit runs on Binky before any customer.
|
||||||
|
4. **Evidence is recorded at solution time, not reconstructed later.**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## The dogfood loop
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
Sense: internal operational pain
|
||||||
|
Interpret: map pain to ecosystem capability
|
||||||
|
Decide: use / build / adapt capability
|
||||||
|
Act: solve internally
|
||||||
|
Record: evidence and reusable pattern
|
||||||
|
Learn: update productization backlog (OfferCatalog.md)
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Evidence entry template
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
dogfood_case: ""
|
||||||
|
date: ""
|
||||||
|
pain: ""
|
||||||
|
capability_used: ""
|
||||||
|
pillar: coulomb | net_kingdom | railiance | cross
|
||||||
|
before: ""
|
||||||
|
after: ""
|
||||||
|
effort: ""
|
||||||
|
reusable_pattern: ""
|
||||||
|
product_implication: ""
|
||||||
|
evidence_links: []
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Evidence log
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*(append entries below)*
|
||||||
66
EcosystemMap.md
Normal file
66
EcosystemMap.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||||
|
# Ecosystem Map
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Status: draft v0.1 — 2026-07-16. Skeleton; to be populated by repo/capability
|
||||||
|
> cartography (see workplan). Ecosystem ≠ company: the ecosystem generates and
|
||||||
|
> matures capabilities; the company commercializes and consumes them.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pillars
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Coulomb — capability formation surface
|
||||||
|
> Discovers, clusters, matures, and packages reusable capabilities.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Commercial angles: capability registry, reuse marketplace, product ideation
|
||||||
|
surface, repo/product intelligence, adaptive pricing experiments,
|
||||||
|
membership/community layer.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Known assets (to verify/expand): reuse-surface, adaptive-pricing, Coulomb
|
||||||
|
membership concepts.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Net Kingdom — sovereign secure operating substrate
|
||||||
|
> Provides identity, access, security, governance, and operational sovereignty
|
||||||
|
> for agentic and human systems.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Commercial angles: IAM/security stack, controlled agent access, audit/security
|
||||||
|
architecture.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Known assets (to verify/expand): OpsBridge, Keycape, OpenBao patterns, PECS,
|
||||||
|
identity-canon, user-engine.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Railiance — reliable execution and coordination layer
|
||||||
|
> Coordinates reliable workflows, deliveries, evidence chains, and operational
|
||||||
|
> commitments.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Commercial angles: coordination products, evidence-backed communications,
|
||||||
|
delivery/result tracking, workflow reliability.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Known assets (to verify/expand): coordination-engine, email-connect,
|
||||||
|
citation-evidence.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Cross-pillar / unassigned assets
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
To classify during cartography: ConfigAtlas, feature-control,
|
||||||
|
consistency-frame, HelixForge-style software factory, markitect, personhood,
|
||||||
|
foerster_capabilities, the-custodian / state-hub itself (candidate product:
|
||||||
|
agentic company cockpit).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Capability entry template
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
capability: <name>
|
||||||
|
pillar: coulomb | net_kingdom | railiance | cross
|
||||||
|
repos: []
|
||||||
|
maturity: idea | prototype | internal_use | productizable | product
|
||||||
|
dogfood_status: not_used | in_use | proven
|
||||||
|
product_candidates: []
|
||||||
|
owner: bernd
|
||||||
|
notes: ""
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Triad summary
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
Coulomb → discover and shape capability
|
||||||
|
Net Kingdom → secure and govern capability
|
||||||
|
Railiance → coordinate and deliver capability
|
||||||
|
Binky / OK → sell, operate, and prove capability
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
58
OfferCatalog.md
Normal file
58
OfferCatalog.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
|
||||||
|
# Offer Catalog
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Status: draft v0.1 — 2026-07-16. Offers, not just products — an offer can
|
||||||
|
> exist before the software is complete. Earn from Level 1–2 while maturing
|
||||||
|
> Level 3.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Initial commercial category
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> **Operational Knowledge Readiness for Agentic Companies** — before agents
|
||||||
|
> can run company processes, operational knowledge must become visible,
|
||||||
|
> structured, governable, and executable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Level 1 — Advisory / service offers (fastest to monetize)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Offer | Status |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| **Operational Knowledge Audit** (flagship candidate) | candidate — dogfood on Binky first |
|
||||||
|
| Configuration Surface Assessment | candidate |
|
||||||
|
| Agentic Operations Readiness Review | candidate |
|
||||||
|
| Security / Access Control Architecture Review | candidate |
|
||||||
|
| Capability Registry Workshop | candidate |
|
||||||
|
| Digital Communication Evidence Assessment | candidate |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Flagship: Operational Knowledge Audit — deliverables
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Operational knowledge map
|
||||||
|
- Capability inventory
|
||||||
|
- Configuration surface map
|
||||||
|
- Access / identity risk notes
|
||||||
|
- Process/control-loop catalog
|
||||||
|
- Automation readiness score
|
||||||
|
- Agentic autonomy lane recommendations
|
||||||
|
- Prioritized implementation roadmap
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Level 2 — Productized service offers (repeatable packages)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
ConfigAtlas Discovery Sprint · Net Kingdom IAM/Security Bootstrap ·
|
||||||
|
Coordination Evidence Setup · Solo-Founder Agentic Cockpit Setup ·
|
||||||
|
Capability Registry Implementation · Feature-Control Introduction Package
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Level 3 — Software products (scalable assets)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
ConfigAtlas · reuse-surface · coordination-engine · email-connect ·
|
||||||
|
feature-control · OpsBridge · Keycape · Agentic Company Cockpit
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Offer entry template
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
offer: ""
|
||||||
|
level: 1 | 2 | 3
|
||||||
|
status: candidate | drafted | published | sold | retired
|
||||||
|
target_segment: ""
|
||||||
|
promise: ""
|
||||||
|
deliverables: []
|
||||||
|
price_hypothesis: ""
|
||||||
|
dogfood_evidence: []
|
||||||
|
dependencies: []
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
41
OfficeHourQueue.md
Normal file
41
OfficeHourQueue.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||||
|
# Office-Hour Queue
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Status: live document — Orange-lane items that need business-hour
|
||||||
|
> interaction (calls, banks, authorities, accountant, notary). Batched into
|
||||||
|
> ~two office-hour command days per month. Agents preload each day with a
|
||||||
|
> runbook; the day is scarce strategic infrastructure — protect it from
|
||||||
|
> low-leverage work.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Item template
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
id: OH-2026-NNN
|
||||||
|
title: ""
|
||||||
|
counterparty: "" # accountant, bank, authority, customer, vendor
|
||||||
|
status: queued | prepared | done
|
||||||
|
prepared_material: [] # briefings, drafts, documents ready before the call
|
||||||
|
deadline_pressure: none | soft | hard (date)
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Queued items
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*(populated by the Binky Operational Knowledge Audit — expected: accountant
|
||||||
|
contact/filing status, bank account access verification, registry detail
|
||||||
|
check)*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Office-Hour Runbook template
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```markdown
|
||||||
|
# Office-Hour Command Day — <date>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Must do today
|
||||||
|
1. ...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Prepared material
|
||||||
|
- ...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Do not spend time on
|
||||||
|
- internal documentation
|
||||||
|
- repo cleanup
|
||||||
|
- speculative naming
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
75
RiskRegister.md
Normal file
75
RiskRegister.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
|
||||||
|
# Risk Register
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Status: draft v0.1 — 2026-07-16. Known failure modes, mitigations, and
|
||||||
|
> escalation paths. Reviewed in the daily brief; updated whenever a risk
|
||||||
|
> changes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Risk entry template
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
id: RISK-NNN
|
||||||
|
title: ""
|
||||||
|
class: legal | financial | security | product | attention | ecosystem
|
||||||
|
likelihood: low | medium | high
|
||||||
|
impact: low | medium | high
|
||||||
|
status: open | mitigating | accepted | closed
|
||||||
|
mitigation: ""
|
||||||
|
escalation: ""
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Open risks
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
id: RISK-001
|
||||||
|
title: "Unknown compliance state of dormant GmbH (filings, tax, registry)"
|
||||||
|
class: legal
|
||||||
|
likelihood: medium
|
||||||
|
impact: high
|
||||||
|
status: open
|
||||||
|
mitigation: "Binky Operational Knowledge Audit v0; accountant engagement (Orange lane)"
|
||||||
|
escalation: "Hard legal deadline discovered → allowed escalation even when founder unavailable"
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
id: RISK-002
|
||||||
|
title: "IP ownership between Bernd (private) and GmbH unclarified"
|
||||||
|
class: legal
|
||||||
|
likelihood: high
|
||||||
|
impact: high
|
||||||
|
status: open
|
||||||
|
mitigation: "Inventory during audit; clarify before any ecosystem product is sold"
|
||||||
|
escalation: "Blocks S4 (first external offer) if unresolved"
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
id: RISK-003
|
||||||
|
title: "Founder attention is the single point of failure"
|
||||||
|
class: attention
|
||||||
|
likelihood: high
|
||||||
|
impact: high
|
||||||
|
status: mitigating
|
||||||
|
mitigation: "AutonomyPolicy lanes; decision packages; unattended-progress design"
|
||||||
|
escalation: "Decision queue older than 14 days → prune and re-prioritize"
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
id: RISK-004
|
||||||
|
title: "Too many parallel product ideas dilute focus (idea cloud > portfolio)"
|
||||||
|
class: product
|
||||||
|
likelihood: high
|
||||||
|
impact: medium
|
||||||
|
status: open
|
||||||
|
mitigation: "Offer Catalog levels; one flagship offer first; success ladder discipline"
|
||||||
|
escalation: "Founder decision on focus if >3 offers active simultaneously"
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```yaml
|
||||||
|
id: RISK-005
|
||||||
|
title: "Agentic stack becomes busywork generator instead of progress engine"
|
||||||
|
class: product
|
||||||
|
likelihood: medium
|
||||||
|
impact: medium
|
||||||
|
status: open
|
||||||
|
mitigation: "Every loop must feed a queue, a decision, or evidence; brutalist founder interface; token budgets"
|
||||||
|
escalation: "Weekly review shows activity without milestone movement"
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
41
SuccessMilestones.md
Normal file
41
SuccessMilestones.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||||
|
# Success Milestones
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Status: draft v0.1 — 2026-07-16. The ladder from legal shell to "ok.com is a
|
||||||
|
> rational acquisition". Intermediate rungs keep the mythic endpoint from
|
||||||
|
> distorting the present.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Success ladder
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Rung | Milestone | Status |
|
||||||
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||||
|
| S0 | Legal vessel exists | ✅ done (2019) |
|
||||||
|
| S1 | Company is administratively clean | ⬜ in progress (Phase 1) |
|
||||||
|
| S2 | Company has an active operating system | ⬜ started (this repo) |
|
||||||
|
| S3 | First internal dogfood loop works | ⬜ |
|
||||||
|
| S4 | First external offer published | ⬜ |
|
||||||
|
| S5 | First paid revenue | ⬜ |
|
||||||
|
| S6 | Repeatable productized service | ⬜ |
|
||||||
|
| S7 | Software-supported delivery | ⬜ |
|
||||||
|
| S8 | Multiple customers | ⬜ |
|
||||||
|
| S9 | Operational Knowledge rename makes sense | ⬜ |
|
||||||
|
| S10 | Category identity emerges | ⬜ |
|
||||||
|
| S11 | OK becomes a serious brand | ⬜ |
|
||||||
|
| S12 | ok.com becomes a rational acquisition | ⬜ |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Rename readiness criteria (gate for S9)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Rename to **Operational Knowledge GmbH** when most of these are true:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [ ] First repeatable offer exists
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Clean accounting/admin operations
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Website and messaging are coherent
|
||||||
|
- [ ] At least one paying customer or serious pilot
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Ecosystem map is understandable to outsiders
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Dogfood evidence exists
|
||||||
|
- [ ] Product direction is narrower than the full idea cloud
|
||||||
|
- [ ] "Operational Knowledge" clearly describes what is being sold
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Rule
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Milestone status changes are founder decisions, recorded in
|
||||||
|
`DecisionQueue.md` with evidence.
|
||||||
83
workplans/BNKY-WP-0001-operating-kernel-bootstrap.md
Normal file
83
workplans/BNKY-WP-0001-operating-kernel-bootstrap.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
id: BNKY-WP-0001
|
||||||
|
title: "Binky / OK Operating Kernel Bootstrap"
|
||||||
|
status: active
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Make Binky Hedgehog GmbH practically operable and strategically aimed at
|
||||||
|
becoming Operational Knowledge GmbH. Scope: ratify the company canon, run the
|
||||||
|
first internal audit, populate the ecosystem map, form the flagship offer, and
|
||||||
|
get the queue-driven operating rhythm running. Corresponds to reactivation
|
||||||
|
Phase 1 and success-ladder rungs S1–S3.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Task: Founder ratifies company canon v0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Review and approve/revise INTENT.md, AutonomyPolicy.md, and companion docs
|
||||||
|
(DEC-2026-001 in DecisionQueue.md). Red lane — founder only.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```task
|
||||||
|
id: BNKY-WP-0001-T01
|
||||||
|
status: todo
|
||||||
|
priority: high
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Task: Run Binky Operational Knowledge Audit v0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Dogfood the flagship offer on the company itself: inventory legal, tax,
|
||||||
|
banking, domains, email, contracts, repos, IP ownership, obligations, costs,
|
||||||
|
revenue paths, risks. Output feeds CompanyReactivationPlan.md checklist,
|
||||||
|
RiskRegister.md, OfficeHourQueue.md, and becomes the reusable audit template.
|
||||||
|
Green/Blue preparation; findings needing external action go to queues.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```task
|
||||||
|
id: BNKY-WP-0001-T02
|
||||||
|
status: todo
|
||||||
|
priority: high
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Task: Populate Ecosystem Map via repo cartography
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Classify actual repos and assets into Coulomb / Net Kingdom / Railiance /
|
||||||
|
cross, using the capability entry template in EcosystemMap.md. Record maturity
|
||||||
|
and product candidates. Green lane.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```task
|
||||||
|
id: BNKY-WP-0001-T03
|
||||||
|
status: todo
|
||||||
|
priority: medium
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Task: Draft flagship offer — Operational Knowledge Audit
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Turn the audit template plus Binky dogfood evidence into a drafted Level-1
|
||||||
|
offer in OfferCatalog.md: target segment, promise, deliverables, price
|
||||||
|
hypothesis. Drafting is Green; publishing is Yellow (decision package).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```task
|
||||||
|
id: BNKY-WP-0001-T04
|
||||||
|
status: todo
|
||||||
|
priority: medium
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Task: Establish operating rhythm (daily brief + queue hygiene)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Define and exercise the daily brief format (decide now / progress / risks /
|
||||||
|
best next hour), keep DecisionQueue and OfficeHourQueue current, and seed the
|
||||||
|
Autopilot Work Queue with evergreen Green/Blue work. Blue lane.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```task
|
||||||
|
id: BNKY-WP-0001-T05
|
||||||
|
status: todo
|
||||||
|
priority: medium
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Task: Prepare first Office-Hour Command Day runbook
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
From audit findings, batch all Orange-lane items (accountant, bank, registry)
|
||||||
|
into a prepared runbook per the OfficeHourQueue.md template. Green preparation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```task
|
||||||
|
id: BNKY-WP-0001-T06
|
||||||
|
status: todo
|
||||||
|
priority: low
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue