tegwick
dc615ef530
Register canned-prompts under agents / practice (topic
c1d199b6-55ee-4db6-b49e-257a9f0f15ac, workplan prefix CANP-WP) via
`statehub register`, then replace the generated placeholders with
repo-specific facts.
- SCOPE.md: real boundaries drawn from INTENT.md's deliberate boundary,
current state (spec v0.1 + reference CLI, 3/3 tests pass, example
round-trips), and the developer workflow.
- AGENTS.md: drop the unresolved {CREDENTIAL_ROUTING} template token left
by the generator.
- CANP-WP-0001: bootstrap tasks closed.
- CANP-WP-0002: new workplan carrying the five § 23 open questions promoted
from "experience will decide" to "decide for v0.2" — optional-input
defaults (static or derived), registry namespaces/ownership, prompt
composition, canonical eval schemas, typed context/dependency contracts —
plus two reference-implementation conformance defects found in review
(prerelease versions sort as newest; copy_immutable packages the whole
source directory).
Also lands the previously untracked seed: INTENT.md, the CPF v0.1 spec,
the reference CLI, and examples/pqrst-estimate.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bjefh8NUiEiahN4JLwoSKM
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 388925@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 3507023f-e0fd-4a1e-9d90-a0d4217d1502
1.6 KiB
1.6 KiB
Review the coding session described below and produce a PQRST Estimate of where effort was spent.
Use these categories:
- P — Main problem: implementing or directly solving the requested deliverable.
- Q — Quality and tests: tests, verification, edge cases, maintainability, error handling, cleanup, and production-quality hardening.
- R — Research and context clarification: reading the codebase or docs, tracing behavior, investigating unknowns, reconciling requirements, and establishing missing context.
- S — Security and credentials: authentication, authorization, secrets, credentials, trust boundaries, security validation, and security-specific handling.
- T — Task organization: planning, decomposition, todo management, sequencing, coordination, and overhead required to keep the work organized.
Treat this as a post-session audit, not a planning estimate. Estimate relative cognitive/work effort rather than tokens or wall-clock time. The five percentages must sum to exactly 100%.
Where activities overlap, assign effort according to the primary purpose of the activity. Do not inflate a category merely because it was important; estimate how much effort it actually consumed.
Session material:
{{ session_summary }}
Return:
P: NN%
Q: NN%
R: NN%
S: NN%
T: NN%
Total: 100%
Then provide:
- Primary effort driver — one sentence naming what dominated the session.
- Interpretation — what the distribution says about the session's shape.
- Signal — one notable imbalance, if any, that may be worth learning from.
Include rationale: {{ include_rationale }}