The answer to the capability question was conditional: keep both fields if
they carry the required/observed distinction, fix the terminology if they do
not. They did not.
Section 9 opened with "records known requirements or observations", mixing
both in one field — `models` was observational ("known to be compatible or
evaluated") while `capabilities` was prescriptive ("expected from the
execution environment"). Section 10 then described dependencies as what a
prompt "expects". Both fields said expected, so the overlap was real
ambiguity rather than redundancy, and the fix is terminology.
`dependencies` now means **required**; `compatibility` means **observed**. A
consumer must not refuse to run a package because its environment is absent
from a compatibility list. The same capability name may legitimately appear in
both: required to run at all, and separately observed to work well on
particular models. `compatibility.aliases` records the same capability under
other names, so a consumer can recognize a requirement its environment labels
differently.
Dependencies now have three kinds, separated by what the format can do about
them: `prompts` it resolves by id and version; `context` names what it does
not package at all; `capabilities` are what the environment must be able to
do. Context entries use `name` rather than `id`, because nothing can look them
up, and `description` is required because nothing else can explain an
unpackaged dependency. A capability takes no version and no
`requirement: generate` — it is not an artifact and cannot be fetched, pinned
or generated. Capability names are free-form kebab-case, validated for shape
and not membership, exactly as tags are.
Section 10.1 also draws the line the format had never stated: an input is
content the caller passes for one use; a context dependency is a standing fact
about the environment.
Spec: 9 rewritten, 9.1 and 10.1 and 10.2 new, 10 reframed, 18 (rules 19-20),
4 updated. Former 10.1/10.2 renumbered to 10.3/10.4 with cross-references.
Reference CLI: validate_capabilities, validate_context_dependencies, and a
`resolve` section listing required capabilities and context under "this tool
cannot verify these" rather than implying it checked. Tests 51 -> 65.
Also drops an invented `session-review` capability from the example package in
favour of an honest `long-context` observation.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Bjefh8NUiEiahN4JLwoSKM
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 388925@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 3507023f-e0fd-4a1e-9d90-a0d4217d1502
89 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
89 lines
3.2 KiB
Markdown
# canned-prompts reference CLI
|
|
|
|
This is intentionally a **small reference implementation**, not the intended final architecture.
|
|
|
|
It demonstrates eight verbs:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
add PATH
|
|
search QUERY
|
|
show ID
|
|
resolve ID --set key=value
|
|
render ID --set key=value
|
|
eval ID
|
|
install ID [--version VERSION]
|
|
publish PATH
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The implementation uses a local catalog plus a filesystem registry and performs no model calls.
|
|
|
|
`resolve` and `render` are separate because the specification separates them
|
|
(§ 5.1): resolution decides each value and may be non-deterministic, rendering
|
|
substitutes and always is. `resolve` prints where every value came from —
|
|
supplied, default, or fallback — before any prompt is produced.
|
|
|
|
## Stores
|
|
|
|
Default locations:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
~/.canned-prompts/catalog
|
|
~/.canned-prompts/registry
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
A **registry** stores packages flat, because an id is unambiguous within one
|
|
registry:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
<registry>/<id path>/<version>/...
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
A **catalog** is namespaced by registry, because identity is registry-scoped
|
|
(§ 3.2) and the same id may be installed from more than one place:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
<catalog>/<registry name>/<id path>/<version>/...
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
~/.canned-prompts/catalog/house/practice/pqrst-estimate/0.1.0/
|
|
~/.canned-prompts/catalog/local/practice/pqrst-estimate/0.1.0/
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
A registry's name comes from its optional `registry.yaml`, and otherwise from
|
|
its directory basename. `add` takes a package from a path rather than a
|
|
registry, so it files it under `local` (override with `--as`).
|
|
|
|
Commands that take an ID accept a bare id or a qualified `<registry>:<id>`.
|
|
A bare id installed from more than one registry is reported as ambiguous
|
|
rather than resolved by guessing.
|
|
|
|
## Design choices
|
|
|
|
- YAML manifest via PyYAML.
|
|
- `{{ name }}` template substitution only.
|
|
- No arbitrary expression/code execution.
|
|
- Published versions are immutable by default.
|
|
- `install` copies from registry to catalog.
|
|
- `add` copies a package directly to catalog.
|
|
- `search`, `show`, `resolve`, and `render` operate on catalog packages, and
|
|
print qualified `<registry>:<id>` references.
|
|
- `include` defaults are satisfied (inclusion is deterministic); `derive`
|
|
defaults are reported, not run. Inclusion cycles are detected and named.
|
|
- `eval` runs the deterministic render checks of any eval declaring the
|
|
`canned-prompts/eval-rubric/v0.1` schema, and reports output criteria as
|
|
declared but not run. Unrecognized schemas are skipped, not rejected. A
|
|
failed render check exits non-zero.
|
|
- `resolve` lists required capabilities and context dependencies, which this
|
|
tool cannot verify, rather than implying it checked them.
|
|
- An optional `registry.yaml` names a registry and records namespace claims.
|
|
`publish` warns when a namespace is declared `closed` — it cannot
|
|
authenticate a publisher, and says so rather than implying it checked.
|
|
- Static input defaults are applied; **derived** defaults (§ 6.1) are not. This
|
|
tool never calls a model, so a derived default is satisfied only by its
|
|
static fallback `value`. Without one, `resolve` reports the input as
|
|
unresolved and `render` refuses rather than substituting empty text.
|
|
|
|
Use this implementation to challenge the format. Replace it once real usage reveals the right architecture.
|