canned-prompts/workplans/CANP-WP-0005-inclusion-diamond.md

id	type	title	domain	repo	status	owner	topic_slug	created	updated	state_hub_workstream_id
CANP-WP-0005	workplan	Document and detect inclusion diamonds	agents	canned-prompts	proposed	codex	practice	2026-09-06	2026-09-06	773f08a3-f899-53fc-87c8-037f8ffbd24d

Document and detect inclusion diamonds

Residual from CANP-WP-0004 (origin: residual, origin_ref: CANP-WP-0004).

Warn about repeated inclusion

id: CANP-WP-0005-T01
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "74234a7a-c3bd-5bf7-a40d-21ddf208cfb5"

CPF inclusion (§ 10.4) does not deduplicate: when one package reaches the same dependency by two paths, the included text renders once per path. This was found by building a real collection — helix/repo-advance rendered its conventions block twice — and worked around downstream by factoring the shared routine into its own fragment.

§ 10.4 says nothing about it, so an author meets the behaviour only by reading the output carefully. That silence is the defect.

Two questions, and the second depends on the first:

1. Document it. State in § 10.4 that inclusion is textual and repeated, not deduplicated, and give the factoring pattern that avoids a diamond.
2. Detect it. Decide whether validation should warn when a package reaches the same dependency by more than one path. A warning is cheap and catches the mistake at add time. Silently deduplicating is a different proposition entirely — it would mean choosing which occurrence survives, and deciding what happens when two paths resolve different versions of the same dependency. That is resolver behaviour, and § 10.4 keeps composition declarative on purpose.

Leaning: document it now, warn at validation time, and do not deduplicate.