clay-borg/scenarios/ground/gr-e04-coalitions.yaml

59 lines
1.7 KiB
YAML
Raw Normal View History

scenario: ground/gr-e04-coalitions
description: >
BONDED COALITIONS scoring (GR-E04): Bond networks score together,
Rivalries do not connect, and an unbonded player is a coalition of
one. Personal scores subtract Blame (GR-E03, GR-T02).
covers: [GR-E03, GR-E04, GR-O03]
CB-WP-0026: collect the rulings -- ten answers that arrived and were never applied ground-game ruled all ten U-items on 2026-08-03, every one CONFIRMED as the default clay-borg simulates, and confirmed five of six provisional scenarios. clay-borg never collected the answers: CB-RES-0007 reported "0 of 10 ruled" the same day, and CB-WP-0022 built the finding register two days later still recording them as `reported`. make design's first run is what noticed -- not a human, not the adversarial review that found four other things. That is the unread-inbox failure running in the opposite direction, and it appears nowhere in the declaration, survey, ADR or spec of the pass that was built entirely around the forward version. It is arguably worse: an unread message is visible as silence, while a collected-but-unapplied ruling looks exactly like work in progress. Ten rulings quoted into §Underdetermined (the three conditional ones verbatim -- U1's designer note, U2's End-only trigger, U8's consume-only-if-it-cancels). Five provisional flags lifted, replaced by ruled/ruled_by/ruled_note so the flag went and the provenance stayed. Register queue 9 -> 0. T02's control came back clean: make sim is 26 passed, 59 rules covered, nothing red. Had a scenario gone red it would have meant we described our own behaviour incorrectly to ground-game. I wrote two U-item mappings and both were wrong. gr-a04 -> U1 (it asserts consent is REQUIRED; U1 asks WHEN the target accepts) and gr-d05 -> U5 (it exercises the UNREJECTED Reverse; U5 is the rejected one). Both plausible from covers:, neither survived reading the description. Third and fourth instance of this defect; the first two reached ground-game. So encodes_u_item is now a declaration and design.py asserts the file names what it claims -- and that check's own first version grepped for mentions and went red when two files recorded why they do NOT encode U1 and U5. A mention is not a claim, which is exactly the looseness that let "six of the ten have provisional scenarios" stand. Two positive controls went red for the best possible reason, both broken the same way -- asserting against live repo data instead of constructing their condition. rule-coverage.py required at least one provisional item to EXIST; it now builds a fixture and reports the live count as a diagnostic, because there is no number of provisional items this project should have. design-baseline.py pinned "2 of 6" while recomputing one row from a live glob, so the dated snapshot was never a snapshot; frozen to its 2026-08-03 list and unwired from self-tests, since per ADR-0012 D8 it is no longer a reporting tool. ScenarioFile is deny_unknown_fields and refused the four new fields until declared -- correct: a corpus accepting unknown metadata would let a typo'd encodes_u_iem sit there claiming nothing. DEVIATION: ADR-0012 D2 said "no new file". GroundRules.md crossed the loadability limit, so the register moved to specs/FindingRegister.md. D2's substance holds -- one register, same machinery, nothing competing -- but the literal instruction did not, and it resolves an awkwardness D2 named itself. make all: exit 0. loop-lint clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 16:13:37 +02:00
ruled: 2026-08-03
ruled_by: ground-game
ruled_note: >
GROUND-WP-0002 T03, 2026-08-03 — confirm: encode Modes.csv MODE_COALITION as printed. Encodes no U-item; provisional on the mode data.
seed: 42
setup:
players: 3
preset: standard-3p
patch:
"lead": 0
"round": 5
"mode": BondedCoalitions
CB-WP-0021 T01/T02/T05: the engine plays its own data — AM-7 blocks ADR-0011 decided it: vendor the CSV with a checked digest, read it with a ~50-line reader, and let the hashes move. The declaration's constraint was measured against the WRONG BUDGET. It said a CSV crate costs 21,613 against AM-4a's 3,798 of headroom, '5.7x over, settled by measurement'. But setup and problem_priorities are cfg(scenarios) and are not in the shipped runtime at all, so AM-4a never sees them. Against AM-4b, csv costs 17,651 against 19,742 -- it FITS, with 2,091 to spare. It is refused anyway, on proportion: 89% of the budget's remaining capacity to read 20 rows. The revisit condition is stated (nested quoting, embedded newlines, multiple dialects). GR-S01 now deals Surface + hidden 1..=k as ruled, with edition values and suits. Measured: 6/9/12 available against thresholds 5/7/9 -- the game is winnable at every seat count, which is what the maintainer could not do. gd0001 is INVERTED, not deleted, and now also asserts the 6/9/12 so a deal that is reachable for the wrong reason still fails. Blast radius was scenario expectations, exactly as the ADR predicted: no scenario pinned a hash and no bundle is committed. Six scenarios and two unit tests updated, each with a note. gr-e01-threshold-unreachable-2p is RENAMED to -reachable- and rewritten as the non-provisional import check ground-game asked for by name. gr-e03's setup was restructured, not just renumbered: with values 2,2,2 its personal-edge test would have tied three ways and asserted nothing. BLOCKING: AM-7 fails at median 0.845 against its 0.9 floor. Isolated across three runs -- 3 problems + stand-in 0.97, 3 problems + edition 0.909, 4 problems + edition 0.845. State is BOUNDED (proven: identical after 5k and 100k events), so this is not the unbounded-growth defect AM-7 exists to catch; it is a bigger working set streaming a long log. Whether AM-7's floor is still right for a larger aggregate is a spec question and lowering it requires an ADR, so it is not being tuned here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 00:47:56 +02:00
# Edition values 2+2+2 = 6 claimed; 3p threshold is 7, so still no
# group success — the band this scenario needs is unchanged.
"problems.1.claimed_by": 0
"problems.2.claimed_by": 1
"problems.3.claimed_by": 2
"relations.0-1": Bond
"relations.1-2": Rivalry
"players.0.blame_from": [2]
commands:
- actor: P1
cmd: select_action
args: { action: SUPPORT, target: P2 }
- actor: P2
cmd: select_action
args: { action: SUPPORT, target: P1 }
- actor: P3
cmd: select_action
args: { action: INVESTIGATE, problem: 2 }
- actor: SYSTEM
cmd: reveal
- actor: SYSTEM
cmd: resolve
- actor: SYSTEM
cmd: end_round
expect:
events:
- kind: GameEnded
state:
"outcome.total": 6
"outcome.group_success": false
# P1 claimed value 1 less one Blame; P2 value 2; P3 value 3.
CB-WP-0021 T01/T02/T05: the engine plays its own data — AM-7 blocks ADR-0011 decided it: vendor the CSV with a checked digest, read it with a ~50-line reader, and let the hashes move. The declaration's constraint was measured against the WRONG BUDGET. It said a CSV crate costs 21,613 against AM-4a's 3,798 of headroom, '5.7x over, settled by measurement'. But setup and problem_priorities are cfg(scenarios) and are not in the shipped runtime at all, so AM-4a never sees them. Against AM-4b, csv costs 17,651 against 19,742 -- it FITS, with 2,091 to spare. It is refused anyway, on proportion: 89% of the budget's remaining capacity to read 20 rows. The revisit condition is stated (nested quoting, embedded newlines, multiple dialects). GR-S01 now deals Surface + hidden 1..=k as ruled, with edition values and suits. Measured: 6/9/12 available against thresholds 5/7/9 -- the game is winnable at every seat count, which is what the maintainer could not do. gd0001 is INVERTED, not deleted, and now also asserts the 6/9/12 so a deal that is reachable for the wrong reason still fails. Blast radius was scenario expectations, exactly as the ADR predicted: no scenario pinned a hash and no bundle is committed. Six scenarios and two unit tests updated, each with a note. gr-e01-threshold-unreachable-2p is RENAMED to -reachable- and rewritten as the non-provisional import check ground-game asked for by name. gr-e03's setup was restructured, not just renumbered: with values 2,2,2 its personal-edge test would have tied three ways and asserted nothing. BLOCKING: AM-7 fails at median 0.845 against its 0.9 floor. Isolated across three runs -- 3 problems + stand-in 0.97, 3 problems + edition 0.909, 4 problems + edition 0.845. State is BOUNDED (proven: identical after 5k and 100k events), so this is not the unbounded-growth defect AM-7 exists to catch; it is a bigger working set streaming a long log. Whether AM-7's floor is still right for a larger aggregate is a spec question and lowering it requires an ADR, so it is not being tuned here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 00:47:56 +02:00
"outcome.personal.0": 1
"outcome.personal.1": 2
CB-WP-0021 T01/T02/T05: the engine plays its own data — AM-7 blocks ADR-0011 decided it: vendor the CSV with a checked digest, read it with a ~50-line reader, and let the hashes move. The declaration's constraint was measured against the WRONG BUDGET. It said a CSV crate costs 21,613 against AM-4a's 3,798 of headroom, '5.7x over, settled by measurement'. But setup and problem_priorities are cfg(scenarios) and are not in the shipped runtime at all, so AM-4a never sees them. Against AM-4b, csv costs 17,651 against 19,742 -- it FITS, with 2,091 to spare. It is refused anyway, on proportion: 89% of the budget's remaining capacity to read 20 rows. The revisit condition is stated (nested quoting, embedded newlines, multiple dialects). GR-S01 now deals Surface + hidden 1..=k as ruled, with edition values and suits. Measured: 6/9/12 available against thresholds 5/7/9 -- the game is winnable at every seat count, which is what the maintainer could not do. gd0001 is INVERTED, not deleted, and now also asserts the 6/9/12 so a deal that is reachable for the wrong reason still fails. Blast radius was scenario expectations, exactly as the ADR predicted: no scenario pinned a hash and no bundle is committed. Six scenarios and two unit tests updated, each with a note. gr-e01-threshold-unreachable-2p is RENAMED to -reachable- and rewritten as the non-provisional import check ground-game asked for by name. gr-e03's setup was restructured, not just renumbered: with values 2,2,2 its personal-edge test would have tied three ways and asserted nothing. BLOCKING: AM-7 fails at median 0.845 against its 0.9 floor. Isolated across three runs -- 3 problems + stand-in 0.97, 3 problems + edition 0.909, 4 problems + edition 0.845. State is BOUNDED (proven: identical after 5k and 100k events), so this is not the unbounded-growth defect AM-7 exists to catch; it is a bigger working set streaming a long log. Whether AM-7's floor is still right for a larger aggregate is a spec question and lowering it requires an ADR, so it is not being tuned here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 00:47:56 +02:00
"outcome.personal.2": 2
# GR-E04: P1+P2 are Bonded; the Rivalry leaves P3 solo.
"outcome.coalitions.0.members": [0, 1]
CB-WP-0021 T01/T02/T05: the engine plays its own data — AM-7 blocks ADR-0011 decided it: vendor the CSV with a checked digest, read it with a ~50-line reader, and let the hashes move. The declaration's constraint was measured against the WRONG BUDGET. It said a CSV crate costs 21,613 against AM-4a's 3,798 of headroom, '5.7x over, settled by measurement'. But setup and problem_priorities are cfg(scenarios) and are not in the shipped runtime at all, so AM-4a never sees them. Against AM-4b, csv costs 17,651 against 19,742 -- it FITS, with 2,091 to spare. It is refused anyway, on proportion: 89% of the budget's remaining capacity to read 20 rows. The revisit condition is stated (nested quoting, embedded newlines, multiple dialects). GR-S01 now deals Surface + hidden 1..=k as ruled, with edition values and suits. Measured: 6/9/12 available against thresholds 5/7/9 -- the game is winnable at every seat count, which is what the maintainer could not do. gd0001 is INVERTED, not deleted, and now also asserts the 6/9/12 so a deal that is reachable for the wrong reason still fails. Blast radius was scenario expectations, exactly as the ADR predicted: no scenario pinned a hash and no bundle is committed. Six scenarios and two unit tests updated, each with a note. gr-e01-threshold-unreachable-2p is RENAMED to -reachable- and rewritten as the non-provisional import check ground-game asked for by name. gr-e03's setup was restructured, not just renumbered: with values 2,2,2 its personal-edge test would have tied three ways and asserted nothing. BLOCKING: AM-7 fails at median 0.845 against its 0.9 floor. Isolated across three runs -- 3 problems + stand-in 0.97, 3 problems + edition 0.909, 4 problems + edition 0.845. State is BOUNDED (proven: identical after 5k and 100k events), so this is not the unbounded-growth defect AM-7 exists to catch; it is a bigger working set streaming a long log. Whether AM-7's floor is still right for a larger aggregate is a spec question and lowering it requires an ADR, so it is not being tuned here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 00:47:56 +02:00
"outcome.coalitions.0.score": 3
"outcome.coalitions.1.members": [2]
CB-WP-0021 T01/T02/T05: the engine plays its own data — AM-7 blocks ADR-0011 decided it: vendor the CSV with a checked digest, read it with a ~50-line reader, and let the hashes move. The declaration's constraint was measured against the WRONG BUDGET. It said a CSV crate costs 21,613 against AM-4a's 3,798 of headroom, '5.7x over, settled by measurement'. But setup and problem_priorities are cfg(scenarios) and are not in the shipped runtime at all, so AM-4a never sees them. Against AM-4b, csv costs 17,651 against 19,742 -- it FITS, with 2,091 to spare. It is refused anyway, on proportion: 89% of the budget's remaining capacity to read 20 rows. The revisit condition is stated (nested quoting, embedded newlines, multiple dialects). GR-S01 now deals Surface + hidden 1..=k as ruled, with edition values and suits. Measured: 6/9/12 available against thresholds 5/7/9 -- the game is winnable at every seat count, which is what the maintainer could not do. gd0001 is INVERTED, not deleted, and now also asserts the 6/9/12 so a deal that is reachable for the wrong reason still fails. Blast radius was scenario expectations, exactly as the ADR predicted: no scenario pinned a hash and no bundle is committed. Six scenarios and two unit tests updated, each with a note. gr-e01-threshold-unreachable-2p is RENAMED to -reachable- and rewritten as the non-provisional import check ground-game asked for by name. gr-e03's setup was restructured, not just renumbered: with values 2,2,2 its personal-edge test would have tied three ways and asserted nothing. BLOCKING: AM-7 fails at median 0.845 against its 0.9 floor. Isolated across three runs -- 3 problems + stand-in 0.97, 3 problems + edition 0.909, 4 problems + edition 0.845. State is BOUNDED (proven: identical after 5k and 100k events), so this is not the unbounded-growth defect AM-7 exists to catch; it is a bigger working set streaming a long log. Whether AM-7's floor is still right for a larger aggregate is a spec question and lowering it requires an ADR, so it is not being tuned here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 00:47:56 +02:00
"outcome.coalitions.1.score": 2
rejects: []