CB-REV-0001: the adversarial review, and it was not approvable
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s

Thirteen challenges, five FATAL, all five conceded. Nothing had reached
ground-game, which is the only reason this is a correction and not a
retraction.

The worst: `Reactive` was not "greedy with one preference changed". It
differed in five, including SpendFreedom — ranked 95 unconditionally
against greedy's `95 if gated else 0` — so the seat burned its Freedom
token in round one of every game. A second change to the exact mechanism
under study, and every number in CB-EV-0031 was measuring it. The pass
claimed ADR-0018's one-varying-parameter discipline in its own workplan
while violating it. GreedyPolicy::rank is now public and the policy
delegates, overriding one match arm, so the control is structurally true.

Withdrawn entirely: "H1-B suppresses DARVO in the attacker". Disabling
H1-B under the corrected policy changes the arm count by exactly zero.
The pass hedged the wrong variable — it disclaimed "the number 2" and
defended "the direction", and the direction is what failed. The
supporting inference was invalid anyway: final Stress cannot show who
armed, because DarvoEnded resets the stage and REVERSE gives its owner -2.

Corrected: criterion 1 was failed on the greedy column while the pass's
own printed table showed 31-1000 arms in the other columns — the
selective-column move, in the file that names it. "Peak Stress was 1" was
a maximum over StressSet payloads, not held state (true: 2); the baseline
game count was 1,600 not 3,200; and "a reckless policy plays identically
to a careful one" is refuted by this repo's own rank-95 policy.

Inert controls replaced, each verified red against the reviewer's own
mutation: the baseline hash test compared two identically-constructed
states (serde(skip) on variant left 57/57 green); the `unchanged:` test
checked 3 of 7 entries and passed with SOLVE made illegal; H1-A's ordering
and H1-B's OU-cancel path had no test at all.

edition-check now covers catalog.yaml and rules_delta.yaml, whose digests
CB-WP-0038 claimed and never recorded — the review found it and reported
it unverified rather than absent, which was the right call.

Still open: H1-B on the DARVO extra-Attack path is untested, regulation.rs
still skips setup failures silently, and round-5 arms are counted though
they can never act.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-08 02:02:35 +02:00
parent 38106791a6
commit 041c0e7c3e
9 changed files with 489 additions and 101 deletions

View file

@ -46,6 +46,27 @@ falsifiers rather than merely skipped
the designer placed *outside* the core; importing it would break the claim
that this engine plays the edition as printed (ADR-0015 D2).
## The catalog and the H1 experiment package
Vendored 2026-08-08 from `ground-game` `8886543` (CB-WP-0038). These are
**outside this directory** — `editions/catalog.yaml` and
`editions/experiments/h1-problem-stress/` — because the catalog selects
*between* packages and does not belong inside one.
**Digests were claimed for these by CB-WP-0038 T01 and not recorded**;
the adversarial review ([CB-REV-0001](../../reviews/CB-REV-0001-h1.md))
reported it unverified and it was a real gap.
```
sha256 eb21fa3237637790fef601fe6668a190a549715e9a78b7dfe47b40cd069b648e ../catalog.yaml
sha256 f58e81f84ea2b0d16e39932261eb3f3d9890345cdf37ad6f0b3abc00636840be ../experiments/h1-problem-stress/rules_delta.yaml
sha256 7b1cc0149122b855e827bc930576ed165bf7dd8d62707e845a9e514ce3521f8e ../experiments/h1-problem-stress/Actions.csv
```
**`rules_delta.yaml` is the load-bearing one**: it is the executable
statement of H1, and the kernel implements it. A silent change there is a
silent change to what we measured.
## Digests
```