coulomb/clay-borg
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

CB-WP-0049 T02/T03: a seat that plays its objective, and F27 splits in two
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Has been cancelled
Details

Browse source 
objective() reads GroundState::score (now public) rather than restating
what winning is; a copy in the bot would disagree with the kernel the
first time ground-game rules on F28.

Working out WHERE the modes can differ was most of the task and it
bounds the result: SOLVE always claims for the actor, so own-score and
group-score want the same SOLVE nearly everywhere. That is a fact about
GROUND's action set, not a shortcoming of the bot. Two real divergences,
both readable off the table: SUPPORT regulates someone else (worth less
against a rival, worth MORE under coalitions where a Bond merges them
into my side), and SOLVE's value is the card's value, which greedy
ignores entirely.

THE RESULT — F27 splits in two:
  group success  UNCHANGED in 34 of 36 cells
  who wins       MOVES: BONDED COALITIONS at 4p goes 2.04 -> 2.98,
                 2.12 -> 3.29, 2.05 -> 3.01 winning seats per game

So "the competitive modes are scoring lenses over cooperative play" was
too strong and is withdrawn. The sharper claim: GROUND's scoring modes
change WHO WINS, not WHETHER THE GROUP SUCCEEDS. And the effect is
seat-band dependent -- 2p none, 4p largest, 6p none under coalitions;
two relation slots capping network growth is a candidate explanation and
is untested.

The panel now prints BOTH policies side by side. That was a correction
mid-task: the first version printed only the new one and I compared it
against a figure remembered from CB-WP-0047 -- a comparison against a
board nobody re-ran.

Control that makes the numbers mean anything: under SHARED GROUND the
two policies agree at all but <=2 decision points across 12 boards, so a
moving column is mode-awareness and not simply a different bot.

Also: two T01 tests keyed on `status: proposed`, which ground-game
renamed to `ready-for-implement` mid-session. They now find the module
by asking resolve() -- the structural property is ours and does not move
when another repo edits its vocabulary.

Also: `make vendor` replaces three hand re-vendors with a tool that
regenerates digests by walking editions/, and reports one-sided files
rather than resolving them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-08 23:31:11 +02:00
parent 82b9e7df31
commit 3045eb03f8
16 changed files with 859 additions and 94 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
editions/ground-darvo-r0/PROVENANCE.md
View file

@ -58,9 +58,9 @@ the adversarial review ([CB-REV-0001](../../reviews/CB-REV-0001-h1.md))
reported it unverified and it was a real gap.
```
sha256 84d43ac110615a678276c318a64a26d9996a9f3f2edbb1b72c38c3e12cf68149 ../ASPECTS.md
sha256 684abb9856e81d456eb214efc7bcfc643e06200451daae1653c528a8b93f5c66 ../CATALOG.md
sha256 297c36c67f19a3ccdab152c928f94ff39c861c7ce836c9dfc10a773a7fe51ee2 ../catalog.yaml
sha256 536ad836991804e8d96eff20ae549654ecb82e28cdd884914730b70e3c387ee3 ../ASPECTS.md
sha256 5b5f1b73a6fa0f7a8d9ef2061670efc1c309d69774dea9e0deeb3fbce0a399b9 ../CATALOG.md
sha256 2adedb8c28570c33e126484c472d8b097067f50358f2ac523f1b3c976e66947a ../catalog.yaml
sha256 7b1cc0149122b855e827bc930576ed165bf7dd8d62707e845a9e514ce3521f8e ../experiments/h1-problem-stress/Actions.csv
sha256 62785f5e7e245c60171624d15de2f40187a44fec54f93c7d9705cf52584b1078 ../experiments/h1-problem-stress/Rules_Text.csv
sha256 49897a68056643a8cfccff32c9e4a9811018b4e4689b90a85124a487f2318369 ../experiments/h1-problem-stress/VARIANT.md
@ -75,11 +75,11 @@ sha256 54678e312332ab999826710ae30565c0bba4da76b781ba4f391ace0c4341e484 ../mod
sha256 0eec2ef761c5f6548085156248f182fa077ac5aee7c657bd6bfa6ba22d53446b ../modules/attack_relief/self_soothe_ge4/MODULE.md
sha256 91463363a482219109bb6d5033019135b5b10505f55f6272b912c7a51cd90173 ../modules/attack_relief/self_soothe_ge4/rules_delta.yaml
sha256 a02aa5ee860aca71d3e7c19975dd5eb1c66d7c8a0f3d3ceca8dd9914b85d6c7e ../modules/end_condition/fixed_rounds_5/MODULE.md
sha256 6d7d1f5b1d629b61dc35299606393cdac969379bb6207b5c1e741ddbbf50c06e ../modules/end_condition/hybrid_clear_collapse/MODULE.md
sha256 8dda4def373cd4aaaefdf764c915ad54ae7a1b4d885ee2cd623e81f752fdb907 ../modules/end_condition/hybrid_clear_collapse/rules_delta.yaml
sha256 b1706aa3a10bace4fac5854eaa73848bba331cc9720da4b162e09db415631a50 ../modules/end_condition/hybrid_clear_collapse/MODULE.md
sha256 66eca80a673583499da2cfef01439ebf511401b5af9fad6a9ee790b0006e98b8 ../modules/end_condition/hybrid_clear_collapse/rules_delta.yaml
sha256 5b809680afdf9282a457f8d7f70b111bf18590f4867622e332f49e1ee4a23b08 ../modules/problem_deal/fixed_setup/MODULE.md
sha256 d8ddf74127aa6adf32be6a9e30dac4e6b9ff14da1a9e0bb74d2faf22794e8a57 ../modules/problem_deal/pressure_deck/MODULE.md
sha256 c05addd208e9d2c287a8da8a2112e24a6b30aa163b19fe763362eae59598ce30 ../modules/problem_deal/pressure_deck/rules_delta.yaml
sha256 ca656820336e37b72fdd2409c15f54102c4f7daf9ab0a0b94fc1f30119b1c727 ../modules/problem_deal/pressure_deck/MODULE.md
sha256 1845ee0d3ec48ff6df31fca6f6acb1cad8b362c65ca7e7d93dfd61e0426fcdbd ../modules/problem_deal/pressure_deck/rules_delta.yaml
sha256 a5e66fd60abef1cf965b0b20892548c65f4005c45f4d44c025e4756eff579897 ../modules/problem_stress/flat_any_open/MODULE.md
sha256 95fa5d4ad811407eda1cf31d99d5dd984e9d1d9af8c284e10df598874d0f06e3 ../modules/problem_stress/flat_any_open/rules_delta.yaml
sha256 1e9cb6e2dac046a9f48beccb0ddc09c41608306711320159ecdce3572562e454 ../modules/problem_stress/none/MODULE.md