T03: specs/CostAccounting.md — 15 contracts, 8 metrics, each with a command
Normative spec for the cost model (dedup by requestId, per-model and per-TTL pricing), the attribution contract (ending-at-commit intervals scoped by sessionId), and the reported shape (composition, not a total). Every acceptance row names the command that produces its number, per InnerLoop Step 4. AC-5..AC-8 are the positive control: cb-cost --self-test must fail on a dedup violation, on zero responses, on a missing subagent tree, and on 5m cache priced at the 1h rate. The feasibility check earns its place here: AC-1's $92.87 is reachable only if CA-06 holds. The earlier $92.21 target was reachable only by a collector with the exact blind spot the survey documented. MetricsAndScenarios 1a superseded. Two of its rules struck through rather than deleted, because both were wrong in instructive ways: "if the cache split is unknown, count all input at full price" would have priced 80.5M cache reads at 10x, and "the hub already records tokens" named as a source what is only ever a lossy sink. M-D2-TOK demoted -- tokens are not comparable across models or cache states. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c3e6e72ab2
commit
b96cd94a64
3 changed files with 193 additions and 10 deletions
|
|
@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ Gate: no collector code before this ADR is committed.
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: CB-WP-0002-T03
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "00d42ed2-4391-4580-aae2-06e3e151c69b"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue