CB-REV-0002: round 2, and the corrections were not approvable either

Three FATAL, five SERIOUS. The substance of round 1's corrections held —
Reactive is genuinely one arm different, the five replacement controls are
non-inert, the inert metric is right, the numbers reproduce. What failed
were the CLAIMS about them, and two defects the corrections introduced.

FATAL 1: the fix for round 1's #11 did not fix it. The assertion was
`games + setup_fails == 200`, and a refused setup increments setup_fails
while skipping games — so the sum is invariant under exactly the failure
it claimed to catch. Injecting setup failures gave exit 0 over 196-game
columns. Now asserts games == GAMES, verified to exit 101.

FATAL 2: the correction to the selective-column FATAL was itself
selective. "81-1000 per cell, baseline AND H1" and "31-1000" twelve lines
apart, both taken from the baseline row; under H1 rank-75 arms are
59/0/0/0. Every cell is now printed rather than summarised, and the
corrected verdict is the opposite of the one it replaced: under rank-75,
H1 REDUCES DARVO arms to zero at 3p and above.

FATAL 3: "DARVO arms 2 per seat per game" is 1 per seat per game, exactly,
at every band.

SERIOUS: the tiebreak oracle asserted only that the winner set CHANGED, so
reversing the tiebreak left it green; the #13 defect's impact was claimed
and never measured (72,000 games: zero divergences — real in principle,
witnessed only by a constructed board); a 29-of-363 citation pointed at a
file that did not contain it (round 1's reviewer did report it, and it was
never transcribed — the record was wrong, not the number); the harnesses
were run by NO GATE, so every published figure came from a manual run of
an ungated binary, including the assertion added for #1; and edition-check's
sibling handling — added by the last correction — was self-certifying,
crashed instead of failing, and counted Markdown lines as coverage. Now
discovered on disk, and it found a real gap on its first run: Rules_Text.csv
vendored with no digest.

Also: "peak Stress held" was dead code kept quiet by `let _ = held;` — the
numbers were right by coincidence.

make panels is now a registered gate. Round 3 is owed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

gates.toml

@@ -163,3 +163,17 @@ caught = [
   "CB-WP-0013: forced SH-3's re-justification and then its retirement. `make gate-review` had reported SH-3 as a standing breach for seven passes with zero actions taken, which is this registry's own ritual test (ADR-0006 D4); asking what it had ever caught is what exposed that the metric could not read above ~0% in the window it was gated on (ADR-0008 D1)",
 ]
 retire_if = "it has retired, tightened, or forced the re-justification of nothing by its review date — then it is a ritual, and ADR-0006 D4 says rituals cash out or go"
+
+[[gate]]
+id = "CB-REV-0002/7"
+name = "variant panels"
+target = "panels"
+checks = "the H1 measurement harnesses actually run, and a short cell fails rather than printing a number a reader must notice"
+notes = """
+Registered because the second adversarial review asked what the harness
+would report if the work silently stopped, and the answer was "green, and
+nothing else": `attack-value` and `regulation` were wired into no target,
+so every figure in CB-EV-0030 and CB-EV-0031 came from a manual run of an
+ungated binary -- including the assertion added to catch short cells,
+which was unreachable from `make`.
+"""