CB-REV-0002: round 2, and the corrections were not approvable either

Three FATAL, five SERIOUS. The substance of round 1's corrections held —
Reactive is genuinely one arm different, the five replacement controls are
non-inert, the inert metric is right, the numbers reproduce. What failed
were the CLAIMS about them, and two defects the corrections introduced.

FATAL 1: the fix for round 1's #11 did not fix it. The assertion was
`games + setup_fails == 200`, and a refused setup increments setup_fails
while skipping games — so the sum is invariant under exactly the failure
it claimed to catch. Injecting setup failures gave exit 0 over 196-game
columns. Now asserts games == GAMES, verified to exit 101.

FATAL 2: the correction to the selective-column FATAL was itself
selective. "81-1000 per cell, baseline AND H1" and "31-1000" twelve lines
apart, both taken from the baseline row; under H1 rank-75 arms are
59/0/0/0. Every cell is now printed rather than summarised, and the
corrected verdict is the opposite of the one it replaced: under rank-75,
H1 REDUCES DARVO arms to zero at 3p and above.

FATAL 3: "DARVO arms 2 per seat per game" is 1 per seat per game, exactly,
at every band.

SERIOUS: the tiebreak oracle asserted only that the winner set CHANGED, so
reversing the tiebreak left it green; the #13 defect's impact was claimed
and never measured (72,000 games: zero divergences — real in principle,
witnessed only by a constructed board); a 29-of-363 citation pointed at a
file that did not contain it (round 1's reviewer did report it, and it was
never transcribed — the record was wrong, not the number); the harnesses
were run by NO GATE, so every published figure came from a manual run of
an ungated binary, including the assertion added for #1; and edition-check's
sibling handling — added by the last correction — was self-certifying,
crashed instead of failing, and counted Markdown lines as coverage. Now
discovered on disk, and it found a real gap on its first run: Rules_Text.csv
vendored with no digest.

Also: "peak Stress held" was dead code kept quiet by `let _ = held;` — the
numbers were right by coincidence.

make panels is now a registered gate. Round 3 is owed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

reviews/CB-REV-0001-h1.md

@@ -97,7 +97,10 @@ Stress is ever added. ATTACK is the sole inbound pressure.
 - **11 — `regulation.rs` still skips setup failures silently.** Conceded
   and **fixed**: counted, and a short cell now fails an assertion rather
   than printing a number a reader must notice.
-- **13 — round-5 arms, and scoring from `self`.** Both **fixed**, and the
+- **13 — round-5 arms, and scoring from `self`.** *(Round 1's reviewer
+  reported the arm figure as **29 of 363 at 2p, 8%**, under its
+  `StrictReactive`. That number was omitted when this file was written and
+  later cited to it — see CB-REV-0002 #6. Recorded here now.)* Both **fixed**, and the
   second was a real defect rather than a reporting one: `score` reads
   Stress for the GR-E03/GR-E04 tiebreaks, so the final round's pressure
   was invisible to the two modes CB-EV-0030 reports on. Inert arms are now