CB-WP-0014-T03: hot-seat evidenced; stage 1 open on one human check
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
CB-EV-0012. Stage 1, deliverable by deliverable: relationship-graph visualization emitted and gated, NEVER SEEN drag-to-propose evidenced end to end debug inspector evidenced (CB-WP-0011) hot-seat play evidenced here Hot-seat was the one closest to being claimed on the strength of the code path existing. SeatPolicy hands every human seat a handle on one shared Server, so turn-taking "obviously" worked — and nothing drove more than one seat until now. The property that matters is not that two turns happen but that the same tab, asked twice, shows two different hands. Mutating the projection to serve P1's view to every seat turns it red. The stage stays open on ONE named blocker rather than a vague reservation: no browser is available to this loop, so the visualization is evidenced only as correctly emitted. Everything testable from here has been tested. What remains is `cb-play --serve 0`, open the URL, confirm the table reads and a drag works. INTENT carries that note now. The self-quoting rule from CB-EV-0011 §4 is ADOPTED: an evidence file quotes the previous pass's final cost and never its own. CB-WP-0013 reported itself at $5.78/34 mid-flight; final is $8.26/47, under by 43%. Four for four, always low. Meta budget 29% [OVER] soft 25%, driven by CB-WP-0013 in a trailing three with two cheap product passes; it was an instrument repair, which ADR-0006 D2 exempts. SH-1 at 347,720 [HARD] against a 300,000 ceiling. Compaction is the remedy and this session cannot do it for itself. CB-EV-0009's standing prediction is now live and testable for the first time in three passes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
55212d7e0f
commit
f768bc4a41
5 changed files with 247 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|||
id: CB-WP-0014
|
||||
kind: product
|
||||
title: "Execute the JavaScript, and close or keep stage 1"
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Purpose
|
||||
|
|
@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ nothing derived from them. That is what it asserts now.
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: CB-WP-0014-T03
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -180,3 +180,24 @@ be.
|
|||
evidence file quotes the previous pass's final cost and never its own.
|
||||
This pass is the first that can apply it — CB-WP-0013's figure is now
|
||||
final. Decide it rather than inheriting it.
|
||||
|
||||
**Done 2026-08-02.**
|
||||
[CB-EV-0012](../evidence/CB-EV-0012-execute-the-javascript.md).
|
||||
|
||||
- **Stage 1 stays open on one named blocker**, not a vague reservation.
|
||||
Three of four deliverables are evidenced by executing code; the
|
||||
visualization is evidenced only as *correctly emitted*, because QuickJS
|
||||
has no layout engine and no browser is available here. What remains is
|
||||
one human action: `cb-play --serve 0`, open the URL, confirm the table
|
||||
reads and a drag works.
|
||||
- **Hot-seat was the deliverable closest to being claimed on the strength
|
||||
of the code path existing.** Nothing drove more than one seat until this
|
||||
pass. Now: two seats, one listener, and the projection follows the seat —
|
||||
mutating it to serve P1's view to everyone turns it red.
|
||||
- **The self-quoting rule is ADOPTED.** CB-WP-0013 reported itself at
|
||||
$5.78/34 mid-flight; final $8.26/47, under by 43%. Four for four.
|
||||
- **AM-4b is blind to 408,237 lines** — more than its own target. Found by
|
||||
a pass that was using it, not auditing it.
|
||||
- **SH-1 at 347,720 `[HARD]`.** CB-EV-0009's standing prediction is now
|
||||
live: the next pass opened above that line should cost more than 0.123
|
||||
per response.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue