Sync hub IDs for CB-WP-0003 and work-record index
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s

Written back by fix-consistency: workstream and task UUIDs for the ten
CB-WP-0003 tasks, plus the regenerated WORK-RECORDS.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-07-31 04:17:59 +02:00
parent 291d1e9798
commit fc76445aec
2 changed files with 22 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| workplan | CB-WP-0001 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
| workplan | CB-WP-0002 | proposed | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md |
| workplan | CB-WP-0003 | proposed | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
| task | CB-WP-0001-T01 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
| task | CB-WP-0001-T02 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
| task | CB-WP-0001-T03 | done | — | workplans/CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md |
@ -26,3 +27,13 @@
| task | CB-WP-0002-T05 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md |
| task | CB-WP-0002-T06 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md |
| task | CB-WP-0002-T07 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md |
| task | CB-WP-0003-T01 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
| task | CB-WP-0003-T02 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
| task | CB-WP-0003-T03 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
| task | CB-WP-0003-T04 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
| task | CB-WP-0003-T05 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
| task | CB-WP-0003-T06 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
| task | CB-WP-0003-T07 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
| task | CB-WP-0003-T08 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
| task | CB-WP-0003-T09 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |
| task | CB-WP-0003-T10 | todo | — | workplans/CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md |

View file

@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
id: CB-WP-0003
title: "Harden the inner loop: executable rules, session economics, dead policy"
status: proposed
state_hub_workstream_id: "39d61dc0-870d-45c1-a595-bcf91f289dce"
---
# Purpose
@ -36,6 +37,7 @@ deleted.
id: CB-WP-0003-T01
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "3d5d45fb-f931-407a-be71-d2d727279d5e"
```
Go through `specs/InnerLoop.md` v1.0 rule by rule and classify each:
@ -60,6 +62,7 @@ added in v1.0 are currently prose.
id: CB-WP-0003-T02
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "f861e67f-ed09-489d-963d-06697da9c08e"
```
`cargo bench -- --test` now covers benchmarks. The same error class
@ -80,6 +83,7 @@ convention nobody can verify.
id: CB-WP-0003-T03
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "1365b35d-4539-489a-beff-c072221e4702"
```
The review step is specified for tier-L *research*. All four real errors
@ -102,6 +106,7 @@ identify what the harness would report if the work silently stopped).
id: CB-WP-0003-T04
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "382724e6-efd5-4ef8-a438-9d31a65dacdb"
```
Measured from the CB-WP-0001 session: **592 assistant turns, mean
@ -131,6 +136,7 @@ policy.
id: CB-WP-0003-T05
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "26c920ee-2c09-4b45-a908-4d343532db09"
```
The global 8k soft / 10k hard per-task token budget was never
@ -152,6 +158,7 @@ restating it.
id: CB-WP-0003-T06
status: todo
priority: low
state_hub_task_id: "8f3a6147-54e8-48f9-8543-c13b0e0b0278"
```
The d10 tier roll never fired across the whole pass — roughly 0.2
@ -170,6 +177,7 @@ to reject.
id: CB-WP-0003-T07
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "2f702821-7e64-4981-9885-82fa07f638aa"
```
AM-4's new targets were measured at 246,250 and set at 250,000 **in the
@ -189,6 +197,7 @@ and AM-4b — either ratify them by ADR or change them.
id: CB-WP-0003-T08
status: todo
priority: low
state_hub_task_id: "c2ee91ee-e551-48a7-b1a9-477c34c0690c"
```
Ten U-items plus GR-E02's "successes" are marked `provisional: true`
@ -206,6 +215,7 @@ file must list them, not that the build breaks.
id: CB-WP-0003-T09
status: todo
priority: low
state_hub_task_id: "69ccc9ec-dc35-481c-8065-cef040f07f50"
```
`make coverage` compares rule IDs in the spec against `covers:` lists.
@ -225,6 +235,7 @@ scenario that claims it?) and cost it before adopting.
id: CB-WP-0003-T10
status: todo
priority: low
state_hub_task_id: "f43de208-92b1-4f0e-9236-a9d27f3ec451"
```
Revise `specs/InnerLoop.md` to v1.1 from this pass. The question to