Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
18c57f2e9d HANDOFF.md: what a generated brief cannot say
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
Every workplan is done and nothing is in flight -- the session stopped at
a boundary, not mid-change -- so the risk on pick-up is not lost context
but MISREAD context.

Records the three findings most likely to be misread (attack_relief is
unreachable-then-real, not null; H1's rejection covers half of H1; the
scope module is inert in round one), what is waiting on ground-game
versus what is ours, the conventions a new session trips over (hub is a
read model; workplan status is active not in_progress; make vendor;
replays/ is gitignored), and the two habits that paid for themselves
repeatedly -- mutate every control, and test the path a player takes.

Linked from the README above the gates, since it should be read before
design — the finding register

  QUEUE (open findings)
    repro  F17  degenerate       raised       6d  ground-game
    repro  F18  inert            raised       6d  clay-borg
    repro  F24  inert            raised       5d  clay-borg
    repro  F25  inert            raised       4d  clay-borg
    repro  F26  inert            ruled        4d  ground-game
    repro  F27  unplayed         reported     4d  clay-borg
    repro  F31  unplayed         reported     4d  clay-borg
    repro  F30  degenerate       ruled        4d  ground-game

  NOTES (not reportable — GameDesign §3.1)
           F12  degenerate         11d
           F15  underdetermined     7d
           F21  degenerate          6d

  findings                       28   (+3 note(s))
  with a resolving reproduction  19/28 = 67%   target 100%
  open, lacking a reproduction   0   target 0
  reproductions green while open 0   target 0
  notes past 30 days             0   target 0
  closed (log)                   20   [U1, U2, U3, U4, U5, U6, U7, U8, U9, U10, F11, F13, F14, F16, F19, F20, F23, F22, F29, F28].

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 00:00:50 +02:00
3f1dbac164 CB-WP-0004 T01: fix environment friction at the root
CB-RES-0003 measured 84 turns and $15.33 — the largest mechanical
category — spent prefixing commands with `cd` and
`export PATH="$HOME/.cargo/bin:$PATH"`. Both causes are now fixed once
instead of per-leaf.

tools/repo.py resolves the repo root from __file__ and cargo from PATH
then the standard rustup locations. Every tool imports ROOT from it, so
the repo path is stated once rather than redefined in four files —
single source of fact, the rule DFD earned in InnerLoop v1.2.
rule-coverage and dep-weight now call enter_root(), which is why their
relative paths did not need rewriting one by one.

The Makefile derives REPO from MAKEFILE_LIST and resolves CARGO the same
way, so `make -C <repo> <target>` works from any directory with no
prefix.

make env-test is the positive control, and is in `make all`: every tool
runs from / with PATH=/usr/bin:/bin. Without it this fix could regress
silently and invalidate T05's measurement — the whole point of the
control loop.

dep-weight's "cargo not on PATH" error is kept rather than deleted. It
should now be unreachable, and --self-test asserts cargo_bin() resolves
unaided; a control that never fires is cheaper than a regression.

loop-lint failed on repo.py on its first run — a reporting tool with a
positive control but no --self-test entry point. Second time the gate
has caught work from its own pass within the hour.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-31 10:13:52 +02:00
52b006580b Adopt TRSL V1C1 license; link ground-game and target-revenue sister repos 2026-07-31 00:25:30 +02:00
8b66604235 Initial commit 2026-07-30 21:18:53 +00:00