clay-borg/decisions
tegwick 2da19a49b7 CB-WP-0021 T01/T02/T05: the engine plays its own data — AM-7 blocks
ADR-0011 decided it: vendor the CSV with a checked digest, read it with
a ~50-line reader, and let the hashes move.

The declaration's constraint was measured against the WRONG BUDGET. It
said a CSV crate costs 21,613 against AM-4a's 3,798 of headroom, '5.7x
over, settled by measurement'. But setup and problem_priorities are
cfg(scenarios) and are not in the shipped runtime at all, so AM-4a never
sees them. Against AM-4b, csv costs 17,651 against 19,742 -- it FITS,
with 2,091 to spare. It is refused anyway, on proportion: 89% of the
budget's remaining capacity to read 20 rows. The revisit condition is
stated (nested quoting, embedded newlines, multiple dialects).

GR-S01 now deals Surface + hidden 1..=k as ruled, with edition values and
suits. Measured: 6/9/12 available against thresholds 5/7/9 -- the game is
winnable at every seat count, which is what the maintainer could not do.
gd0001 is INVERTED, not deleted, and now also asserts the 6/9/12 so a
deal that is reachable for the wrong reason still fails.

Blast radius was scenario expectations, exactly as the ADR predicted: no
scenario pinned a hash and no bundle is committed. Six scenarios and two
unit tests updated, each with a note. gr-e01-threshold-unreachable-2p is
RENAMED to -reachable- and rewritten as the non-provisional import check
ground-game asked for by name. gr-e03's setup was restructured, not just
renumbered: with values 2,2,2 its personal-edge test would have tied
three ways and asserted nothing.

BLOCKING: AM-7 fails at median 0.845 against its 0.9 floor. Isolated
across three runs -- 3 problems + stand-in 0.97, 3 problems + edition
0.909, 4 problems + edition 0.845. State is BOUNDED (proven: identical
after 5k and 100k events), so this is not the unbounded-growth defect
AM-7 exists to catch; it is a bigger working set streaming a long log.
Whether AM-7's floor is still right for a larger aggregate is a spec
question and lowering it requires an ADR, so it is not being tuned here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 00:47:56 +02:00
..
ADR-0002-game-kernel.md T04: adversarial review round + survey corrections + ADR-0002 (reimplement, assimilate patterns) 2026-07-31 01:25:02 +02:00
ADR-0003-cost-accounting.md T02: ADR-0003 — transcript as instrument, commit intervals as attribution 2026-07-31 08:44:27 +02:00
ADR-0004-am4-ratification.md CB-WP-0019 T01/T02: AM-4b asks what a contributor acquires 2026-08-03 19:04:54 +02:00
ADR-0005-assertion-coverage-and-replay.md ADR-0005 + CB-WP-0005: count assertions, not names 2026-07-31 14:25:26 +02:00
ADR-0006-adaptive-control-gates.md ADR-0006 + CB-WP-0009: control gates are experiments 2026-08-01 15:34:27 +02:00
ADR-0007-render-html-not-a-port.md CB-WP-0012-T03: ADR-0007 — render to HTML, and do not declare the port yet 2026-08-02 04:13:35 +02:00
ADR-0008-instrument-corrections.md CB-WP-0013-T02/T03: retire SH-3 as a gate; correct AM-4a and its target 2026-08-02 07:30:14 +02:00
ADR-0009-embed-the-js-engine.md CB-WP-0014-T01/T02: execute the JavaScript — and find AM-4b blind 2026-08-02 07:56:02 +02:00
ADR-0010-what-the-script-may-do.md CB-WP-0017: legible interaction, and the chaos window's verdict 2026-08-02 22:42:45 +02:00
ADR-0011-vendor-the-edition.md CB-WP-0021 T01/T02/T05: the engine plays its own data — AM-7 blocks 2026-08-04 00:47:56 +02:00