Two rules, two different answers, which is the point of a task phrased "implement, or amend and say why". K18 is implemented. "Criterion benches driving the same scenario format at scale" was false — the bench hardcoded its commands and never touched ScenarioFile, while MetricsAndScenarios §3 pointed at a benchmarks/ directory containing only baselines/. benchmarks/synthetic-3p.yaml now holds the workload and both the bench and bench_shape read it: the workload is data, not code. A second defect surfaced while fixing the first. After the bench switched to the file, bench_shape still hardcoded the same sequence, so the workload existed twice — deleting end_round from the YAML broke bench-test while bench_shape kept passing. Duplicated-fact drift in executable form. Both now read the same include_str! and deleting a command breaks both. Explicitly not claimed: this does not unblock AM-3. AM-3's baseline is a declarative game object — moves, turn order, rules. synthetic-3p.yaml is a command list; the rules live in games/ground. Marking it as AM-3's subject would compare a script to a game definition, which is the category error AM-3 is blocked on. The file says so in its own header, where the next person will be tempted. K14 is amended. CommitWindow had zero non-test users and GROUND enforces the same contract inline. Wiring GROUND through it was rejected: it would change the serialized shape of `selections`, which four scenario files assert by dot-path and every state hash depends on, for the sole benefit of making a sentence literally true. The deciding argument is INTENT's, not convenience: abstractions are extracted from working games rather than invented in isolation, and no concept becomes canonical until it survives a second concrete use. CommitWindow was invented before any game needed it and has survived none. Imposing it on GROUND would manufacture the first use rather than discover it. So K14 states what is actually guaranteed, CommitWindow is marked provisional in the source, and it carries a delete-by date of 2026-12-31. Kernel spec->code link 16/18 -> 18/18, stated with the caveat the gate prints every run: that is about names, not assertions. Two self-tests broke and both broke correctly. rule-coverage's gate test hardcoded "unlinked rules exist today" and failed when the last one was linked; it now computes that and asserts the gate fails iff rules are unlinked. facts' text check rejected k_unlinked once it became legitimately empty; empty now renders as "(none)" and the check distinguishes absent from empty. M-D1-MUT: 8 of 14, unchanged — K14 and K18 are kernel rules, not acceptance rows. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
19 KiB
CB-WP-0006 — delivery log
Per-task delivery notes, moved out of the workplan when it crossed the ~400-line loadability limit for the third time in this project. The workplan holds the plan; this holds what happened. T08 draws on both.
CB-WP-0006-T01
Delivered. am6_throughput_clears_the_spec_target in
games/ground/src/lib.rs — a test, not a bench. Best of 3 samples of
50,000 applied events each.
Measured on bnt-lap001 2026-07-31: 341,280 ev/s in debug (3.4× the
target), ~2.4–3.1M in release (~24–30×). The spec target holds even in
an unoptimized build, so the gate needed no cfg split and runs in the
ordinary make test.
The trap was avoided by construction, not by intention. The threshold
is the spec value 100_000, untouched; the constant carries a comment
saying lowering it requires an ADR; and the failure message repeats that,
states the measured headroom, and names the reference figures — so a
future agent hitting a red AM-6 is told not to tune it, in the place they
will actually be reading. Robustness comes from best-of-N, not from a
lower bar: a throughput floor asks "is this machine capable", so
transient load should not fail the build.
Two positive controls in the test itself: a run that applied fewer than 50,000 events, or measured zero elapsed time, fails rather than scoring as infinite throughput.
Verified: make mutation-check --row AM-6 → red, via a property
mutation (4,000 black_box iterations injected into GroundState::fold,
the hot path) rather than a threshold tweak — raising the target would only
prove the comparison runs.
And the FA class is now gated. mutation-check rows gained an
expect field: the mutant's output must contain the row's stated failure
string, or the verdict is WRONG-REASON, not red. Without it, a
mutation that merely failed to compile would credit its row with an
assertion it does not have. Verified by pointing expect at a string the
verifier never prints and confirming the verdict flips. This is
remedy (2) from the CB-WP-0005 retrospective, built one task earlier than
T08 planned because the class it guards is the newest and the most
dangerous.
M-D1-MUT: 4 → 5 of 14.
CB-WP-0006-T02
Delivered — but the two rows resolved differently, and the difference is the point.
AM-2 is instrumented and enforced. tools/size-metrics.py +
make size-metrics, in make all:
AM-2: 27.2 LOC/rule [ok target <= 40] (1.47x headroom)
1,575 code lines before the first #[cfg(test)] / 58 numbered rules
Tests are excluded because AM-2 asks what a rule costs, not how much it
is exercised — lib.rs is ~18% test code and including it would have
flattered the number. Verified red by a property mutation: ~800 lines
of filler injected into the impl, pushing the ratio past 40. expect is
the precise failure signature FAIL target <= 40, not the row name, which
would have matched passing output too.
AM-3 is BLOCKED, not uninstrumented — and this is a finding, not a
deferral. The row measures "LOC to express the CB-RES-0001 synthetic
game on our kernel" against a boardgame.io baseline of ~36 LOC for a
declarative 3p commit/reveal game object. That artifact has never been
built: games/ contains only ground, and benches/synthetic.rs
drives GROUND rather than defining a synthetic game.
Measuring GROUND's 1,575 impl lines against a 36-line synthetic game
object would compare two different games and call the difference a D1
result. So the tool ships the measurement mechanism — a marker-delimited
// AM-3:BEGIN / // AM-3:END region, self-tested — and reports the row
blocked, naming the missing artifact. A number here would have been
worse than a blank.
It therefore stays unmutatable and still counts against M-D1-MUT, per
ADR-0005 §1: a row that cannot fail asserts nothing, however good the
reason. Resolving it needs an artifact, not a metric tweak — carried
forward, not silently dropped.
M-D1-MUT: 5 → 6 of 14.
CB-WP-0006-T03
Delivered — tools/runtime-metrics.py. One passes, one breaches.
AM-9: met, and comfortably. 13.4 MB peak RSS against a ≤64 MB target,
4.8× headroom. Gated and in make all (--fast, ~1 s). The row that
CB-EV-0001 called "very unlikely to bind" was right — but it is now
measured rather than assumed, and verified red by a property mutation
(a 300 MB allocation in the workload).
AM-5: BREACHED MET — the first reading was wrong.
Corrected 2026-08-01 (during T04). T03 reported 87.0 s / 61.3 s and called AM-5 a 45% breach. It is not. Re-measured on a quiet machine with the fixed instrument:
load before measuring: 0.14 per CPU over 8 CPUs — quiet dev toolchain (default features) 37.3 s [ok target <= 60 s] best of 3: 37.3, 42.9, 46.2 (spread 1.24x) shipped runtime (--no-default-features) 41.2 s [ok target <= 60 s] best of 3: 41.2, 50.8, 54.2 (spread 1.32x)1.6× headroom, comfortably met. The 87.0 s was measured while the machine was busy running
mutation-checkand cargo builds — a timing measurement under contention measures the contention. That is the same error class as AM-6's, committed two tasks later in the same session, by the same author, in the row immediately after the one where it was diagnosed.The instrument now (a) reads
/procload average and refuses to measure above 0.5 per CPU, and (b) takes the best of 3 — best, not worst, because a build-time ceiling asks "can this machine do it in 60 s", the mirror of AM-6's best-of-N for a throughput floor. It also warns when the spread exceeds 1.25×, which fired on the shipped-runtime samples: consecutive clean builds degrade (37.3 → 46.2), so even a quiet machine is not a uniform one.
The original, now-withdrawn finding follows for the record:
dev toolchain (default features) 87.0 s [FAIL target <= 60 s]
shipped runtime (--no-default-features) 61.3 s [FAIL target <= 60 s]
The tool reports and exits 0, because the spec says the row is not
gated (and on the corrected number there is nothing to escalate anyway). Gating it is a spec change and needs an ADR; a tool that promotes
itself is how a target starts binding without anyone deciding it should.
So AM-5 stays unmutatable — it cannot fail while the spec declares it
ungated, which is the accurate reason. The escalation is withdrawn:
there is no breach to decide about.
A build profile was investigated anyway while the breach was believed
real, and the findings stand on their own: 51 compile units, 174 s of CPU
work compressed into ~54 s wall, parallelism only 3.2× on 8 cores
because proc-macro2 → syn → serde_derive → serde_core is a ~22 s serial
chain. lto = "thin" costs ~6 s (55.8 → 49.4 s mean) and is the only real
lever; pinning ppv-lite86 down to drop zerocopy (the largest single
unit, 21.8 s) makes it worse — 23 → 25 crates, because the older
version pulls zerocopy-derive. Recorded here rather than acted on: with
1.6× headroom there is nothing to buy.
The measurement had a real bug, found by cross-validation.
getrusage(RUSAGE_CHILDREN) is a high-water mark across every reaped
child, so it attributed cargo's memory to the workload and reported
38.2 MB for a run that used 12.3 MB — a 3× over-report. Fixed with
os.wait4, which returns that specific child's rusage. The self-test now
cross-checks against /usr/bin/time -v (13.4 vs 12.4 MB), which is
the only reason the bug was visible at all: the wrong number was
plausible, passed its target, and would have been published.
That is FA in the measurement layer rather than the mutation layer — an instrument confidently reporting a number it had not earned.
M-D1-MUT: 6 → 7 of 14.
CB-WP-0006-T04
Delivered: withdrawn from the acceptance table, retained as a
diagnostic. specs/GameKernel.md §5a carries the argument.
The ratio has no monotone better direction. INTENT's rule is own the semantics; assimilate the implementation. Rising can mean owning semantics properly, or reimplementing what should have been assimilated. Falling can mean good leverage, or dependency bloat. A target requires knowing which way is better, and this metric does not.
It is also redundant: AM-4a/AM-4b bound the denominator and AM-2 bounds own-source density per rule. AM-4c is a ratio of two already-targeted quantities.
Measured at withdrawal: 1,426 own lines per 100k third-party (shipped),
1,107 (dev). make dep-weight now prints both, labelled
diagnostic, not targeted — it was never actually reported before.
M-D1-MUT keeps AM-4c in its denominator, deliberately, and says so in the output. Dropping it would move the score 7/14 → 7/13 without enforcing anything: a score improved by deleting the question.
A T01 correction found here
The AM-6 gate failed inside make all at 38,753 ev/s against 341,280
measured in isolation — a 9× drop. cargo test runs test binaries and
threads concurrently, so a throughput assertion inside a parallel
harness measures contention, not throughput. T01's measurement was valid
and its gate placement was not.
Fixed by running the measurement only where it is valid — #[ignore],
plus make am6 in release with --test-threads=1, now 2.0M ev/s,
20.2× headroom — and not by lowering the target, which T01 explicitly
forbade and which would have reproduced the defect being fixed. My first
attempt did drift that way (a debug "sanity floor" of 50,000) and was
backed out: a second threshold is still a second chance to tune.
And the mutation went SURVIVED on the first run after the move —
4,000 black_box iterations were calibrated against debug's 3.4×
headroom and are invisible against release's 20×. Raised to 100,000; back
to red. A weak mutation is not a fixed property of a row: it can
become weak when the row's measurement conditions change.
M-D1-MUT: 7 of 14 (unchanged — AM-4c was always going to stay uncounted; what changed is that the reason is now correct and recorded).
CB-WP-0006-T05
Delivered: K9's real assertion, K11's durable format, the LogStore
port, and the shared conformance suites that finally earn AM-11.
K11 — crates/cb-events/src/store.rs. Magic + version header, 4-byte
little-endian length prefix per record, append-only. Reimplemented, not
assimilated (ADR-0005 §2): no new dependency, charged to AM-4a, and
AM-4a/AM-4b are unchanged at 246,250 / 317,021 because nothing was added
to the graph.
The operative clause is detected, so corruption is tested, not assumed: a tail short by one byte, a half-written length prefix, a length prefix corrupted to claim more than the file holds, foreign magic, and a future format version are each rejected with a distinct error. A reader that accepts a truncated tail is worse than no format, because it silently returns a short history that looks complete.
The port and the suite (AM-11). LogStore has two impls —
MemLogStore and FileLogStore — and one conformance() that both
are driven through. The trait carries raw/set_raw specifically so the
corruption controls live in the shared suite: a format contract only one
impl enforces is not a contract.
The same shape was retro-fitted to KernelRng, which is what AM-11
actually names. ChaChaRng and NullRng now pass one
conformance() asserting the properties true of both — bounds,
draw(1) == 0, determinism across fresh instances, and shuffle preserving
the multiset. Previously they were exercised by two separate tests,
which is precisely why AM-11 | met, narrow was never earned and ADR-0005
§4 downgraded it.
K9 — the assertion it did not have. Snapshot at seq N + events
N+1..M ≡ genesis fold, hash-compared, on GroundState, single-seed on
purpose (AM-7's probe folds a multi-seed log, which is not a replay of
anything; that defect is not repeated). Two positive controls: the log
must exceed 50 events, and the mid-log snapshot must differ from the
end state, or "apply the remainder" would be vacuous.
Proof it works: the exact mutation that survived in CB-WP-0005 —
making Snapshot::take discard its EventSeq — now fails:
assertion `left == right` failed: K9: the snapshot must carry the EventSeq it includes
test result: FAILED. 0 passed; 1 failed
AM-11 mutation: break NullRng::draw to return its bound and the
shared suite fails. That is what M-D4-SWAP claims — that either impl can
be substituted — and it is exactly what two separate per-impl tests could
never demonstrate.
M-D1-MUT: 7 → 8 of 14. evidence/CB-EV-0001's scoreboard is refreshed
with AM-2, AM-5 and AM-9 added, AM-6 moved to enforced, and the headline
total corrected from 4 to 8 — it had gone stale within the same workplan
that produced it.
CB-WP-0006-T06
Delivered: K10 replay bundles, cb-sim --replay, and AM-7's withdrawn
hash clause re-earned.
INTENT design decision 8 of 10, unimplemented for six passes. cb-sim had
no flag parsing at all, so --replay had nowhere to go.
The bundle (crates/cb-game-runtime/src/replay.rs, dev-only behind
scenarios, charged to AM-4b): manifest, commands.log,
initial.snapshot, expected.yaml. The command stream goes through the
K11 framing built in T05, so a truncated bundle is detected rather
than replayed short — the two tasks compose rather than duplicating.
The D2 correction the reviewer forced was real. This was not "a
directory of four files": Pass carried only the end state, RunOutcome::Failed
was a formatted String, and scenario.rs created an EventLog,
appended to it and never read it. All three had to change.
The bug that proves the round trip is load-bearing
The first round trip failed to reproduce. Cause: state_hash_hex over
a serde_json::Value is a different canonical form than over the
typed aggregate — Value's map is key-sorted, a struct serializes in
declaration order. The bundle was written with one basis and verified with
the other.
Worth stating plainly: a round trip that had been written to recompute its own comparison value would have passed this bug. It failed precisely because the recorded hash came from the producing process — control 2, which exists for exactly this.
The four controls, all executable
make replay-test, 14/14:
| control | how it is proven |
|---|---|
| something actually fails | a committed fixture in scenarios/fixtures/ (outside the corpus, covers: [], so it neither fails make sim nor inflates AM-1); exactly one bundle produced; all four files present and non-empty |
| hash read from the bundle | tamper only the recorded hash → replay fails. A recomputed comparison would still pass |
| truncation detected | log short by one byte → rejected; length prefix corrupted → rejected |
| replay can fail | mutate the manifest seed → rejected. This bites only because replay re-derives the initial state from seed+setup and checks it against the recorded snapshot; restoring from the snapshot alone would leave the seed inert |
Plus a control on the controls: the bundle must still replay after every mutation is reverted, so the suite cannot leave the tree broken.
AM-7 re-earned
The probe now records a hash per per-game segment and replays each from its own genesis. Folding a segment from the wrong seed fails:
AM-7 hash-identical UNMET: replaying segment seeded 42 (0..64) did not
reproduce its recorded state hash
That is the clause ADR-0005 §4 withdrew as mutation-proven inert. The
scaling >= 0.9x clause is still unenforced, so AM-7 stays PARTIAL —
reported, not rounded up.
Kernel coverage 15/18 → 16/18; K10 is no longer unlinked. facts-check
immediately caught the spec's copy of that number going stale — the DFD
gate earning its place on a number that moved the same hour.
M-D1-MUT: 8 of 14 (unchanged; AM-7 remains partial).
CB-WP-0006-T07
Two rules, two different answers — which is the point of a task phrased "implement, or amend and say why".
K18: implemented
"Criterion benches driving the same scenario format at scale" was false —
the bench hardcoded its command sequence in Rust and never touched
ScenarioFile, while MetricsAndScenarios §3 pointed at a benchmarks/
directory containing only baselines/.
benchmarks/synthetic-3p.yaml now holds the workload, and both the bench
and bench_shape read it. The workload is data, not code.
A second defect surfaced while fixing the first. After the bench
switched to the file, bench_shape still hardcoded the same sequence — so
the workload existed twice, and deleting end_round from the YAML
broke bench-test while bench_shape kept passing. That is
duplicated-fact drift in executable form. Both now read the same
include_str!, and deleting a command breaks both:
assertion `left == right` failed: commands per synthetic round
Explicitly not claimed: this does not unblock AM-3. AM-3's baseline
is a declarative game object (~36 LOC, boardgame.io) — moves, turn
order, rules. synthetic-3p.yaml is a command list; the rules live in
games/ground (1,575 lines). Marking it as AM-3's subject would compare a
script to a game definition, which is the category error AM-3 is blocked
on. The file says so in its own header, where the next person will be
tempted.
K14: amended, and the reasoning is recorded because it could have gone
the other way
CommitWindow had zero non-test users; GROUND enforces the same
contract inline. Wiring GROUND through it was rejected: it would change
the serialized shape of selections, which four scenario files assert by
dot-path and every state hash depends on — a large, risky refactor whose
only benefit is making a sentence literally true.
The deciding argument is INTENT's, not convenience: "abstractions are
extracted from working games... rather than invented in isolation", and
"No concept becomes canonical merely because it looks general. It becomes
canonical after surviving a second concrete use." CommitWindow was
invented before any game needed it and has survived zero uses.
Imposing it on GROUND would manufacture the first use rather than
discover it.
So K14 now states what is actually guaranteed, CommitWindow is marked
provisional in the source, and it carries a delete-by date of
2026-12-31 if no second game uses it. A primitive with one hypothetical
user and a test that exercises only itself is the AM-11 shape, and this
project has now paid for that shape twice.
Consequences
Kernel spec→code link: 16/18 → 18/18 (100%). Stated with the caveat the gate prints on every run: that is a statement about names, not assertions.
Two self-tests broke and both broke correctly:
rule-coverage's gate test hardcoded "unlinked rules exist today" and failed the moment the last one was linked. It now computes whether anything is unlinked and asserts the gate fails iff so — the assertion was right, its premise was transient.facts' "every fact records a value and its rendered text" rejectedk_unlinkedonce it became legitimately empty. Empty now renders as(none), and the check distinguishes absent from empty.
M-D1-MUT: 8 of 14, unchanged. K14 and K18 are kernel rules, not acceptance rows, so neither moves that number — worth stating, because the temptation is to imply progress on a metric this task never touched.