tegwick
3f2ba2ec5d
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
module-panel sweeps points in aspect space the way scenario-panel sweeps boards: one module at a time with every other aspect held, then the profiles where an interaction is the hypothesis. F31: attack_relief.self_soothe_ge4 HAS NEVER FIRED. Zero ATTACKs in every cell, every seat band, both bots. The module acts only on an uncancelled ATTACK by a seat at Stress >= 4, and greedy ranks Ground 100 at the gate against Attack's 10 -- so at exactly the position where self-soothe would pay, GROUND wins. ModuleAwarePolicy adds 55 and that is still not enough. `unplayed`, not `inert`: the kernel implements it correctly and nothing has ever given it an opportunity. This reaches backwards: CB-EV-0030's H1 verdict rests on its flat-pressure half alone, because H1's other half never had an opportunity in those games either. Also: problem_stress.scoped is the only module with a measured effect (3p 85->60 greedy, 86->63 module-aware, peak Stress 2->4); flat_any_open drives group success to 0 at every band, reproducing the H1 rejection from the module side; and scoped_plus_attack_soothe is EXACTLY scoped alone -- necessarily, given F31 -- so the catalog's first intentional multi-aspect combination cannot currently be evaluated as a combination. THE PANEL'S OWN DEFECT, first run: it printed 85/86 for a module that never fired -- real-looking numbers inviting "measured, no effect" when no seat ever created the precondition. Its docstring already said it would not do that; the claim was written before the behaviour was. First fix marked whole rows unmeasured, which threw away h1's real flat-pressure result; the shipped fix names the specific module and keeps the row's numbers, which are real for the modules that did fire. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| ground | ||