tegwick
3f2ba2ec5d
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
module-panel sweeps points in aspect space the way scenario-panel sweeps boards: one module at a time with every other aspect held, then the profiles where an interaction is the hypothesis. F31: attack_relief.self_soothe_ge4 HAS NEVER FIRED. Zero ATTACKs in every cell, every seat band, both bots. The module acts only on an uncancelled ATTACK by a seat at Stress >= 4, and greedy ranks Ground 100 at the gate against Attack's 10 -- so at exactly the position where self-soothe would pay, GROUND wins. ModuleAwarePolicy adds 55 and that is still not enough. `unplayed`, not `inert`: the kernel implements it correctly and nothing has ever given it an opportunity. This reaches backwards: CB-EV-0030's H1 verdict rests on its flat-pressure half alone, because H1's other half never had an opportunity in those games either. Also: problem_stress.scoped is the only module with a measured effect (3p 85->60 greedy, 86->63 module-aware, peak Stress 2->4); flat_any_open drives group success to 0 at every band, reproducing the H1 rejection from the module side; and scoped_plus_attack_soothe is EXACTLY scoped alone -- necessarily, given F31 -- so the catalog's first intentional multi-aspect combination cannot currently be evaluated as a combination. THE PANEL'S OWN DEFECT, first run: it printed 85/86 for a module that never fired -- real-looking numbers inviting "measured, no effect" when no seat ever created the precondition. Its docstring already said it would not do that; the claim was written before the behaviour was. First fix marked whole rows unmeasured, which threw away h1's real flat-pressure result; the shipped fix names the specific module and keeps the row's numbers, which are real for the modules that did fire. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .forgejo/workflows | ||
| benchmarks | ||
| crates | ||
| decisions | ||
| editions | ||
| evidence | ||
| games/ground | ||
| history | ||
| research | ||
| reviews | ||
| scenarios | ||
| simulators | ||
| specs | ||
| tools | ||
| trials | ||
| workplans | ||
| .custodian-brief.md | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| Cargo.lock | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| clippy.toml | ||
| facts.toml | ||
| gates.toml | ||
| INTENT.md | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| Makefile | ||
| README.md | ||
| rust-toolchain.toml | ||
| WORK-RECORDS.md | ||
clay-borg
A rebuild from scratch simulation and games engine framework set up to assimilate and optimize techniques and implementations useful for games, simulations, robotics.
Licensed under the Target Revenue Source License (TRSL V1C1) — see LICENSE; canonical text lives in the org's target-revenue repository.
Running the gates
make all # every gate, from a clean shell
make -C /path/to/clay-borg all # …or from any other directory
There is no environment setup step. No cd, no export PATH, no
activation script. make locates the repo from its own path and cargo
from the standard rustup locations; the Python tools do the same via
tools/repo.py. The only prerequisites are a rustup toolchain and Python
3.11+.
This is deliberate and enforced: make env-test runs every tool from /
with a PATH containing no cargo, and make all includes it. CB-RES-0003
measured 84 agent turns and $15.33 spent prefixing commands with cd and
export PATH before that friction was fixed at the root (CB-WP-0004 T01).
Other useful targets: make cost (spend per task), make cost-budget
(spend since the last commit), make cost-mix (mechanical vs judgment
turns), make loop-lint (executable InnerLoop rules), make self-tests
(every tool's positive control).
GROUND
The first product vertical is a virtual tabletop implementation of GROUND — A Game of Bonds and Rivalry: DARVO Edition. The boardgame itself (rules, editions, content) is at home in the sister repository ground-game — that repo is authoritative for what GROUND is; clay-borg implements the engine that runs it.