tegwick
3f2ba2ec5d
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
module-panel sweeps points in aspect space the way scenario-panel sweeps boards: one module at a time with every other aspect held, then the profiles where an interaction is the hypothesis. F31: attack_relief.self_soothe_ge4 HAS NEVER FIRED. Zero ATTACKs in every cell, every seat band, both bots. The module acts only on an uncancelled ATTACK by a seat at Stress >= 4, and greedy ranks Ground 100 at the gate against Attack's 10 -- so at exactly the position where self-soothe would pay, GROUND wins. ModuleAwarePolicy adds 55 and that is still not enough. `unplayed`, not `inert`: the kernel implements it correctly and nothing has ever given it an opportunity. This reaches backwards: CB-EV-0030's H1 verdict rests on its flat-pressure half alone, because H1's other half never had an opportunity in those games either. Also: problem_stress.scoped is the only module with a measured effect (3p 85->60 greedy, 86->63 module-aware, peak Stress 2->4); flat_any_open drives group success to 0 at every band, reproducing the H1 rejection from the module side; and scoped_plus_attack_soothe is EXACTLY scoped alone -- necessarily, given F31 -- so the catalog's first intentional multi-aspect combination cannot currently be evaluated as a combination. THE PANEL'S OWN DEFECT, first run: it printed 85/86 for a module that never fired -- real-looking numbers inviting "measured, no effect" when no seat ever created the precondition. Its docstring already said it would not do that; the claim was written before the behaviour was. First fix marked whole rows unmeasured, which threw away h1's real flat-pressure result; the shipped fix names the specific module and keeps the row's numbers, which are real for the modules that did fire. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| CB-WP-0001-inner-loop.md | ||
| CB-WP-0002-cost-accounting.md | ||
| CB-WP-0003-loop-hardening.md | ||
| CB-WP-0004-mechanical-work.md | ||
| CB-WP-0005-assertion-coverage.md | ||
| CB-WP-0006-instrument-the-table.md | ||
| CB-WP-0007-session-shape.md | ||
| CB-WP-0008-ship-stage-0.md | ||
| CB-WP-0009-adaptive-gates.md | ||
| CB-WP-0010-consolidation.md | ||
| CB-WP-0011-inspectable-table.md | ||
| CB-WP-0012-render-port.md | ||
| CB-WP-0013-instrument-corrections.md | ||
| CB-WP-0014-execute-the-javascript.md | ||
| CB-WP-0015-the-inert-clauses.md | ||
| CB-WP-0016-the-drop-target.md | ||
| CB-WP-0017-legible-interaction.md | ||
| CB-WP-0018-the-browser-is-a-client.md | ||
| CB-WP-0019-the-am4-family.md | ||
| CB-WP-0020-the-table-you-can-read.md | ||
| CB-WP-0021-import-the-edition.md | ||
| CB-WP-0022-the-design-instrument.md | ||
| CB-WP-0023-solve-legality.md | ||
| CB-WP-0024-the-table-you-can-watch.md | ||
| CB-WP-0025-could-we-have-won.md | ||
| CB-WP-0026-collect-the-rulings.md | ||
| CB-WP-0027-the-commentary-track.md | ||
| CB-WP-0028-the-table-you-sit-at.md | ||
| CB-WP-0029-the-tokens-on-the-table.md | ||
| CB-WP-0030-a-number-that-does-not-move.md | ||
| CB-WP-0031-the-comment-box-outlives-the-game.md | ||
| CB-WP-0032-the-comments-in-the-account.md | ||
| CB-WP-0033-a-game-is-the-unit.md | ||
| CB-WP-0034-who-you-are-bonding-with.md | ||
| CB-WP-0035-a-session-that-answers-nothing.md | ||
| CB-WP-0036-interactive-mode.md | ||
| CB-WP-0037-the-fourteen-unread-files.md | ||
| CB-WP-0038-h1-variant.md | ||
| CB-WP-0039-a-seat-that-does-not-regulate.md | ||
| CB-WP-0040-what-a-statement-is-about.md | ||
| CB-WP-0041-the-extensive-form-foundation.md | ||
| CB-WP-0042-h2-scoped-problem-stress.md | ||
| CB-WP-0043-a-problem-sits-where-its-stress-lands.md | ||
| CB-WP-0044-the-page-says-which-rules-it-plays.md | ||
| CB-WP-0045-the-table-names-what-it-shows.md | ||
| CB-WP-0046-the-rule-the-placement-encodes.md | ||
| CB-WP-0047-all-four-boards-and-all-three-modes.md | ||
| CB-WP-0048-a-configuration-not-a-variant.md | ||
| CB-WP-0049-a-seat-that-plays-its-own-objective.md | ||
| CB-WP-0050-every-configuration-faceted-by-aspect.md | ||