|
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
CB-EV-0010. The pass's own verdict on the tier it ran at. Full-weight review withdrew the capability port the declaration was made to build. A tier-S pass has no step 2 and would have shipped it, and stage 2 would have found it unimplementable — which is what CommitWindow is already on record in this repo for doing. Two corrections of the survey's own numbers, compounding: AM-4a headroom 3,750 claimed -> 92,798 measured (25x) cheapest windowed 480,501 claimed -> 140,079 measured (3.4x) headline ratio 128x -> 1.5x (85x) The prediction from CB-EV-0009 §4 held: meta budget reads 0%, published in advance and unfalsified. A correction that is now a pattern: CB-EV-0009 reported CB-WP-0011 at 45 responses / $4.23 / 0.094; final is 71 / $7.02 / 0.099. Still the cheapest pass, so the conclusion stands. But that is the second consecutive evidence file to report its own pass's cost low — a pass cannot measure its own cost, and one quoting its own is quoting a floor. First priced tier comparison on a single subject: 0.123 $/response at L against 0.099 at S — 24% more, for a pass that found the two errors above. On one data point, step 2 is cheap. Not shipped, and said plainly: the emitted JavaScript has never been executed. The socket loop is tested end to end with synthetic HTTP and the page is asserted against as a parsed document, but no browser engine has run it. INTENT stage 1 therefore stays open even though all four of its named deliverables now exist. SH-3 reads 0.0% for a sixth consecutive pass and remains the oldest unargued number in the project. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| CB-EV-0001-game-kernel.md | ||
| CB-EV-0002-cost-accounting.md | ||
| CB-EV-0003-mechanical-work.md | ||
| CB-EV-0004-assertion-coverage.md | ||
| CB-EV-0005-instrument-the-table.md | ||
| CB-EV-0007-stage-0.md | ||
| CB-EV-0008-adaptive-gates.md | ||
| CB-EV-0009-inspectable-table.md | ||
| CB-EV-0010-render-port.md | ||