tegwick
69c1658d20
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Has been cancelled
T03: InnerLoop v1.7 plus loop-lint's own-cost check. Six passes under-reported themselves by 30-45%, never once high, and the rule lived only in evidence files having been re-derived three times. The READING is load bearing, not the boundary: CB-WP-0018 T04 applied 're-run the instrument at the moment of quoting' alone and its figure was correct. So the operative instruction is re-run when you quote, and loop-lint fails an evidence file naming its own workplan beside a dollar amount without marking it provisional. It binds forward from this pass. The check fires on seven historical files which ARE the evidence for the rule; making them comply would edit the record to remove the thing it proves -- the same category error as a live fact: tag on a dated measurement, which this pass also hit. Lifecycle, at the maintainer's instruction: ready -> active -> done, where ready means declared and not started. loop-lint fails a workplan that has started and still says ready, one that is active with everything closed, and one that is done with an open task. The first version of that check was WRONG and its own self-test caught it: it stripped the leading status: assuming frontmatter, which silently dropped a real task once the frontmatter said ready or active. Both new checks then fired on this pass's own artifacts and both were right to. T04: CB-EV-0017. The new meta budget's first reading is a breach it caused -- 27% against the 20% line, because this pass cost $31.18 against product passes averaging ~$21. Reported rather than exempted: ADR-0006 D2 covers the instrument repairs but not the rule-writing, and the honest reading is that this should have been two passes. CB-WP-0018 settled at $36.53/95 against $28.08/82 last reported, 30% higher. Seven for seven. make all exits 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .forgejo/workflows | ||
| benchmarks | ||
| crates | ||
| decisions | ||
| evidence | ||
| games/ground | ||
| history | ||
| research | ||
| scenarios | ||
| specs | ||
| tools | ||
| workplans | ||
| .custodian-brief.md | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| Cargo.lock | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| clippy.toml | ||
| facts.toml | ||
| gates.toml | ||
| INTENT.md | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| Makefile | ||
| README.md | ||
| rust-toolchain.toml | ||
| WORK-RECORDS.md | ||
clay-borg
A rebuild from scratch simulation and games engine framework set up to assimilate and optimize techniques and implementations useful for games, simulations, robotics.
Licensed under the Target Revenue Source License (TRSL V1C1) — see LICENSE; canonical text lives in the org's target-revenue repository.
Running the gates
make all # every gate, from a clean shell
make -C /path/to/clay-borg all # …or from any other directory
There is no environment setup step. No cd, no export PATH, no
activation script. make locates the repo from its own path and cargo
from the standard rustup locations; the Python tools do the same via
tools/repo.py. The only prerequisites are a rustup toolchain and Python
3.11+.
This is deliberate and enforced: make env-test runs every tool from /
with a PATH containing no cargo, and make all includes it. CB-RES-0003
measured 84 agent turns and $15.33 spent prefixing commands with cd and
export PATH before that friction was fixed at the root (CB-WP-0004 T01).
Other useful targets: make cost (spend per task), make cost-budget
(spend since the last commit), make cost-mix (mechanical vs judgment
turns), make loop-lint (executable InnerLoop rules), make self-tests
(every tool's positive control).
GROUND
The first product vertical is a virtual tabletop implementation of GROUND — A Game of Bonds and Rivalry: DARVO Edition. The boardgame itself (rules, editions, content) is at home in the sister repository ground-game — that repo is authoritative for what GROUND is; clay-borg implements the engine that runs it.