clay-borg/editions/CATALOG.md
tegwick 704b99975b
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 4s
Apply ground-game's rulings: mastery in points, four boards, and a
vendor tool that covers what the gate checks

They ruled on all seven items the same day. Two were actionable here.

F28 RULED: points. Modes.csv MODE_COOP clarified upstream to say
"penalties apply to points, not card count"; mastery is now
total - blame - denied. A recorded scenario went red on it --
gr-e02-shared-ground pinned 0 (2 claimed CARDS - 1 - 1) and now expects
2 (4 POINTS - 1 - 1). The number moved because the rule was decided, not
because the engine drifted, and the scenario records both rulings; its
schema has no field for a second one, so both live in ruled_note with
`ruled` carrying the LATEST date.

F29 RULED not-intended and APPLIED upstream: SCN_02's suits re-tuned the
same day. The characterisation test is how we found out -- it pinned the
duplication, went red on the re-tune, and that red WAS the notification.
It now asserts every pair distinct, the stronger statement the
duplication had made unavailable. SCN_02 re-measures at 73 at 2p, not
67: its own board now.

F26/F30 ruled and recorded. F30's ruling incidentally confirms our
reading -- they name priority-2's suit as the first lever, which is the
difference we identified without having measured causation.

vendor-editions grew twice, both times because it covered less than the
gate it exists to satisfy:

  - It refused to touch ground-darvo-r0/ on the reasoning that the
    baseline is "a separate record". That was wrong within the hour:
    ground-game clarified Modes.csv and `make vendor` reported a clean
    sync while edition-check went red. A sync tool that covers less than
    its check reports success into a red gate.
  - Its two-block rewrite DETECTED which fence held which set and
    preserved the arrangement -- faithfully preserving a swap an earlier
    write had introduced, leaving each fence under a heading describing
    the other. edition-check reads every sha256 line flat and passed
    throughout: a document can be self-consistently wrong and green.
    Order is now asserted, with a control that goes red on a swap.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09 00:15:14 +02:00

6.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Edition & rules catalog (schema 2 — composable modules by aspect)

Authority: this file + catalog.yaml on main.
Aspect map: ASPECTS.md — full design-space dimensionality for GROUND.
Simulator research: clay-borg research/CB-RES-0010-game-aspects-and-design-space.md

Purpose: pin baseline content and independent rules modules so humans and clay-borg can run any module alone or in combination, measure, keep, or reject — without silent baseline edits.


Model

                    ┌─────────────────────┐
                    │  baseline content   │  editions/ground-darvo-rN/
                    │  (CSVs, print data) │
                    └──────────┬──────────┘
                               │
         ┌─────────────────────┼─────────────────────┐
         ▼                     ▼                     ▼
   problem_stress        attack_relief         end_condition  …
   (≤1 module)           (≤1 module)           (≤1 module)
         ▲                     ▲                     ▲
         └────────── aspects of the game ────────────┘
Concept Meaning
Aspect An orthogonal design dimension of the game (how stress is routed, how the game ends, how Problems enter play, …). Full list: ASPECTS.md.
Baseline Edition data package (Problems.csv, modes, …). Frozen columns still require rN→rN+1 (GROUND-WP-0002 T01).
Module One implementable choice on one aspect. Defaults are named modules with no delta.
Profile Named list of modules (convenience). Not a third rules source — expands to baseline + modules.
Configuration Baseline + resolved module list = what is actually played.
Composition At most one module per aspect. Missing aspects use default_module.

Independence rule: a module may only declare rules on its own aspect. Cross-aspect effects belong in a profile (explicit combo) or a new aspect — never silent coupling inside one module.

Legacy experiments (editions/experiments/h1-…, h2-…) remain on disk as measured packages; they map to profiles. Prefer module_id / profile_id going forward.

Synonym: older docs said axis for aspect. Machine field is aspect:.


Aspects with modules (registered)

Aspect Default Other modules
problem_stress none flat_any_open (H1-A, reject), scoped (H2, keep)
attack_relief none self_soothe_ge4 (H1-B)
end_condition fixed_rounds_5 hybrid_clear_collapse (ready-for-implement)
problem_deal fixed_setup pressure_deck (ready-for-implement)

Many other aspects exist but are fixed in r0 until a competing design appears (see ASPECTS.md § full map).


Selection (clay-borg / trials)

Preferred API

baseline: ground-darvo-r0
modules:
  - problem_stress.scoped
  - end_condition.hybrid_clear_collapse   # when implemented
# other aspects → defaults

Or:

profile: h2
# expands to modules: [problem_stress.scoped]

Or multi-aspect:

profile: scoped_plus_attack_soothe
# problem_stress.scoped + attack_relief.self_soothe_ge4

Validation

  1. Every module_id exists and selectable: true.
  2. No two modules share the same aspect.
  3. status: proposed modules may be selected only if the host declares allow_proposed: true (kernel may no-op or refuse).
  4. State / recordings must store the resolved module list (and baseline id), not only a legacy experiment string — so A/B names the point in design space.

Implementation

  • Baseline CSVs: vendor as today.
  • Each module: apply rules_delta + optional data_overlays from its path.
  • Apply modules in aspect order listed in catalog.yaml aspects: (stable, documented).
  • Conflict: refuse composition rather than last-write-wins.
  • consumed_files (RPT-0006): when present on a module, a consumer that has not read those paths is in a detectable incomplete state — not silence. Freshness/edition-check should fail or warn if a listed file is unread or undigested. Modules without the field still work; new modules should list it.

Profiles (named combos)

profile_id modules note
baseline (defaults) Pure r0
h1 flat + attack soothe Legacy H1; reject-as-baseline
h2 scoped Legacy H2; keep-as-experiment
scoped_plus_attack_soothe scoped + soothe Unmeasured combo
scoped_plus_hybrid_end scoped + hybrid end Needs kernel for end
scoped_plus_pressure_deck scoped + pressure deck Needs kernel for deal

Adding a module (checklist)

  1. Confirm the aspect exists in ASPECTS.md; add the aspect first if needed.
  2. Create editions/modules/<aspect>/<slug>/ with MODULE.md and, if non-default, rules_delta.yaml (+ CSV overlays if needed).
  3. Register under modules: with aspect, path, status, decision.
  4. Optionally add a profile that includes it alone and/or with other modules.
  5. Message clay-borg: module_id, aspect, delta path, compose examples.
  6. Measure alone first when possible; then measure interesting profiles.
  7. Update utility_estimate / decision per module (and per profile if combo-specific).

What must not happen

  • Silent edit of frozen baseline columns inside ground-darvo-r0.
  • A new mega-experiment that re-bundles three aspects into one non-decomposable id (use a profile instead).
  • Modules that hard-require another aspects module without documenting a profile.

Git

main + catalog is discovery; commits pin digests; branches optional for WIP. Modules live as directories on main.


Legacy map

Old experiment Prefer
h1-problem-stress profile h1 or modules problem_stress.flat_any_open + attack_relief.self_soothe_ge4
h2-scoped-problem-stress profile h2 or module problem_stress.scoped