Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.8 KiB
| id | kind | title | status | state_hub_workstream_id |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CB-WP-0044 | product | The page says which rules it plays | done | 554a67b4-58f8-462a-b22d-52f81d6f9611 |
Purpose
structural tier M (adds a field to the projection, a canonical
interface, and a driver knob)
declared tier M
The report
"I did a session and noted no changes."
Correct, and the fault was ours twice over.
make ground passes no --variant, so the session was baseline — and
CB-WP-0043 deliberately leaves the baseline layout untouched, because a
variant that redraws the baseline invalidates every prior look at it.
But the deeper defect is that nothing said so. The page named the
round, the step, the Lead, the scoring mode and the viewer — and never
which rules it was playing. GroundView did not even carry the variant.
There was no way, from the screen, to tell baseline from H1 from H2.
A session that cannot say which rules it is playing cannot report a rules change. The player did the right thing and the instrument had nothing to tell them.
Task: say it, and make it reachable
id: CB-WP-0044-T01
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "2e268c45-b605-4503-b1e6-2509f421512e"
Controls:
- the page names the variant, beside the scoring mode where a player already looks for what game this is;
- the inspector names it too — a replay that cannot say which rules produced it is the same defect in the other tool;
make groundcan select it, or the capability exists and nobody can reach it;- verified end to end against a served page, not by reading the code.
Done 2026-08-08.
variant on GroundView, rules <id> in the header, rules <id> in the
inspector, and make ground VARIANT=h2.
Both coverage probes caught the new field independently — the render
crate's and cb-play's — which is the second time in two passes that the
probes have turned an addition into a legibility requirement rather than
letting it be silent state.
Verified by fetching the served page: make ground VARIANT=h2 prints
rules: h2, and the page carries rules h2-scoped-problem-stress plus
the scope labels. The baseline page says rules ground-darvo-r0 and keeps
its row, which is the behaviour CB-WP-0043 intended and could not
previously be told apart from a bug.
What this does not fix
- Nothing on the page explains what a scope does. It says whose a
Problem is; it does not say that an unclaimed personal card ticks only
its owner at Round End. H2's
Rules_Text.csvis vendored and unread. - The variant is not in the trial log's header, so a note written during an H2 session does not record which rules it was about. That is the same class of defect as this one, one artifact along.