clay-borg/tools/rule-coverage.py
tegwick 6be9fbc9af
Some checks failed
ci / check (push) Failing after 3s
CB-WP-0026: collect the rulings -- ten answers that arrived and were never applied
ground-game ruled all ten U-items on 2026-08-03, every one CONFIRMED as
the default clay-borg simulates, and confirmed five of six provisional
scenarios. clay-borg never collected the answers: CB-RES-0007 reported "0
of 10 ruled" the same day, and CB-WP-0022 built the finding register two
days later still recording them as `reported`. make design's first run is
what noticed -- not a human, not the adversarial review that found four
other things.

That is the unread-inbox failure running in the opposite direction, and it
appears nowhere in the declaration, survey, ADR or spec of the pass that
was built entirely around the forward version. It is arguably worse: an
unread message is visible as silence, while a collected-but-unapplied
ruling looks exactly like work in progress.

Ten rulings quoted into §Underdetermined (the three conditional ones
verbatim -- U1's designer note, U2's End-only trigger, U8's
consume-only-if-it-cancels). Five provisional flags lifted, replaced by
ruled/ruled_by/ruled_note so the flag went and the provenance stayed.
Register queue 9 -> 0.

T02's control came back clean: make sim is 26 passed, 59 rules covered,
nothing red. Had a scenario gone red it would have meant we described our
own behaviour incorrectly to ground-game.

I wrote two U-item mappings and both were wrong. gr-a04 -> U1 (it asserts
consent is REQUIRED; U1 asks WHEN the target accepts) and gr-d05 -> U5 (it
exercises the UNREJECTED Reverse; U5 is the rejected one). Both plausible
from covers:, neither survived reading the description. Third and fourth
instance of this defect; the first two reached ground-game. So encodes_u_item
is now a declaration and design.py asserts the file names what it claims --
and that check's own first version grepped for mentions and went red when
two files recorded why they do NOT encode U1 and U5. A mention is not a
claim, which is exactly the looseness that let "six of the ten have
provisional scenarios" stand.

Two positive controls went red for the best possible reason, both broken
the same way -- asserting against live repo data instead of constructing
their condition. rule-coverage.py required at least one provisional item
to EXIST; it now builds a fixture and reports the live count as a
diagnostic, because there is no number of provisional items this project
should have. design-baseline.py pinned "2 of 6" while recomputing one row
from a live glob, so the dated snapshot was never a snapshot; frozen to
its 2026-08-03 list and unwired from self-tests, since per ADR-0012 D8 it
is no longer a reporting tool.

ScenarioFile is deny_unknown_fields and refused the four new fields until
declared -- correct: a corpus accepting unknown metadata would let a typo'd
encodes_u_iem sit there claiming nothing.

DEVIATION: ADR-0012 D2 said "no new file". GroundRules.md crossed the
loadability limit, so the register moved to specs/FindingRegister.md. D2's
substance holds -- one register, same machinery, nothing competing -- but
the literal instruction did not, and it resolves an awkwardness D2 named
itself.

make all: exit 0. loop-lint clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 16:13:37 +02:00

415 lines
17 KiB
Python
Executable file
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""AM-1 / M-D1-COV and AM-1b / M-D1-LNK, over **every** numbered spec.
Two denominators, deliberately separate because they are measured
differently:
ground GR-rules in specs/GroundRules.md, covered by `covers:` lists in
scenarios/ground/*.yaml, and linked to the aggregate source.
kernel K-rules in specs/GameKernel.md. **Link only.** K-rules are
kernel invariants, not game rules: there is no kernel aggregate,
no setup preset and no command vocabulary, so a
`scenarios/kernel/*.yaml` with `covers: [K11]` would be a tag in
a directory the runner cannot dispatch. Claiming scenario
coverage for them would be the inflation this gate exists to
prevent.
Until CB-WP-0005 T01, `AGGREGATE` was one file and the rule pattern
matched `GR-` only, so the kernel spec was outside the instrument
entirely. K10, K14 and K18 were unimplemented for four workplans while
`make coverage` printed `58/58 (100%)`.
Stated limit (InnerLoop implementation rule 4), now doubly important:
**this gate counts names.** It proves no rule is unclaimed, no claimed
rule is invented, and no rule is absent from the source. It does NOT
prove anything fails when a rule is violated — that is M-D1-MUT
(`make mutation-check`, CB-WP-0005 T02), and four of the seven defects
found in CB-RES-0004 were invisible to a name-based check.
Positive control (InnerLoop v1.1 §Step 5): every denominator asserts it
actually found rules. Before this was added, a broken spec regex yielded
rules=[] and missing=[] and the tool exited 0 reporting "0/0" — the
harness-does-nothing class, in the tool that reports our headline
coverage number. A new denominator inherits the control, or it
reintroduces the defect the old one was fixed for.
Usage:
python3 tools/rule-coverage.py
python3 tools/rule-coverage.py --self-test
"""
import datetime
import glob
import os
import re
import sys
from repo import enter_root
RULE_RE = r"\*\*(GR-[A-Z]+\d+)"
COVERS_RE = r"covers: \[(.*?)\]"
AGGREGATE = "games/ground/src/lib.rs"
# CB-WP-0003 T08: a provisional default with no expiry can shape the kernel
# indefinitely while looking handled. CI warns; it does not break the build,
# because the ruling is a ground-game decision we cannot make for them.
PROVISIONAL_WARN_DAYS = 30
ID_RE = r"GR-[A-Z]+\d+"
# ADR-0005 §5: a newly widened denominator is not a regression, so the
# kernel arm reports without feeding the exit code — but only until a
# date that lives in the tool rather than in prose. An open-ended "we
# will gate it later" is how AM-4's targets went unratified for four
# workplans. The remaining days are printed on every run.
KERNEL_GATES_FROM = datetime.date(2026, 8, 31)
# Source roots searched for rule IDs. A list, not one file: K-rules live
# in cb-kernel, cb-events and cb-game-runtime, so a single-file AGGREGATE
# would report every one of them unlinked forever.
SOURCE_ROOTS = ("crates", "games", "tools")
def source_files(roots=SOURCE_ROOTS):
"""Every .rs file under the given roots, excluding build output."""
out = []
for root in roots:
for dirpath, dirnames, files in os.walk(root):
dirnames[:] = [d for d in dirnames if d != "target"]
out += [os.path.join(dirpath, f) for f in sorted(files)
if f.endswith(".rs")]
return sorted(out)
def parse_rules(spec_text, pattern=RULE_RE):
return sorted(set(re.findall(pattern, spec_text)))
def parse_code_ids(text, pattern=ID_RE):
"""Rule IDs named anywhere in the source (T09)."""
return set(re.findall(pattern, text))
def code_ids_over(paths, pattern):
"""Union of rule IDs named across many source files."""
found = set()
for p in paths:
found |= parse_code_ids(open(p).read(), pattern)
return found
def provisional_items(paths):
"""(path, owner, raised) for every scenario encoding a U-item default."""
out = []
for path in paths:
text = open(path).read()
if not re.search(r"^provisional:\s*true", text, re.M):
continue
owner = re.search(r"^provisional_owner:\s*(\S+)", text, re.M)
raised = re.search(r"^provisional_raised:\s*(\S+)", text, re.M)
out.append((path,
owner.group(1) if owner else None,
raised.group(1) if raised else None))
return out
def parse_covers(text):
match = re.search(COVERS_RE, text, re.S)
if not match:
return set()
return {c.strip() for c in match.group(1).split(",") if c.strip()}
def _silent_output():
"""Whatever the kernel arm prints with quiet=True — must be nothing."""
import io
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
buf = io.StringIO()
with redirect_stdout(buf):
kernel_arm(today=datetime.date(2026, 1, 1), quiet=True)
return buf.getvalue()
def self_test():
"""Each assertion pins a failure this tool must detect."""
results = []
def check(name, ok, detail=""):
results.append((name, ok, detail))
# The defect that motivated this control: a spec that parses to zero
# rules must not be reportable as coverage.
check("zero rules detected as a failure", parse_rules("no rules here") == [],
"empty spec yields no rules; main() now aborts on this")
# The matcher must actually match the real format.
check("rule matcher works on real spec format",
parse_rules("**GR-R06** something\n**GR-A12** other")
== ["GR-A12", "GR-R06"])
# covers: parsing, including the empty case.
check("covers matcher works", parse_covers("covers: [GR-R06, GR-A12]")
== {"GR-R06", "GR-A12"})
check("missing covers yields empty set", parse_covers("no covers key") == set())
# T09: the spec -> code link must be detectable.
check("code-id matcher finds ids in source",
parse_code_ids("// GR-R06: lead first\nfn f(){} // GR-A12")
== {"GR-R06", "GR-A12"})
check("code-id matcher finds none in unmarked source",
parse_code_ids("fn f() { let x = 1; }") == set())
# T08: every provisional scenario must carry an owner and a date.
#
# **Tested against a fixture, not against the repo.** This control used
# to read `scenarios/ground/*.yaml` and require `bool(prov)` — a guard
# against a vacuous pass, which is the right instinct, but it made the
# control depend on the repo *having* provisional items. CB-WP-0026
# lifted the last five (ground-game ruled them all on 2026-08-03) and
# the control went red for the best possible reason: nothing is
# provisional any more.
#
# A positive control must construct the condition it tests. The live
# count is a diagnostic below, not a pass criterion — there is no
# number of provisional items this project *should* have.
import glob as _g, tempfile as _tf, os as _os
with _tf.TemporaryDirectory() as _d:
good = _os.path.join(_d, "good.yaml")
bad = _os.path.join(_d, "bad.yaml")
open(good, "w").write("scenario: x\nprovisional: true\n"
"provisional_owner: ground-game\n"
"provisional_raised: 2026-07-31\n")
open(bad, "w").write("scenario: y\nprovisional: true\n")
g = provisional_items([good])
b = provisional_items([bad])
check("a provisional item with an owner and a date passes",
len(g) == 1 and all(o and r for _, o, r in g))
check("a provisional item MISSING its owner/date is caught",
len(b) == 1 and not all(o and r for _, o, r in b),
"without this the check passes on anything it can parse")
live = provisional_items(sorted(_g.glob("scenarios/ground/*.yaml")))
check("every LIVE provisional item has an owner and a raised date",
all(o and r for _, o, r in live),
f"{len(live)} provisional item(s)"
+ (" — none; all ruled 2026-08-03 (CB-WP-0026)" if not live else ""))
# --- CB-WP-0005 T01: the kernel denominator ---
# The control the old arm was fixed for, replicated. A pattern that
# stops matching must abort, not report 0/0 as though it were 100%.
check("kernel: zero rules detected as a failure",
parse_rules("no kernel rules here", r"\*\*(K\d+)\*\*") == [])
check("kernel: matcher works on the real spec format",
parse_rules("- **K10** A replay bundle\n- **K9** A snapshot",
r"\*\*(K\d+)\*\*") == ["K10", "K9"])
check("kernel: matcher does not match GR-rules",
parse_rules("**GR-R06** lead first", r"\*\*(K\d+)\*\*") == [])
# A single-file AGGREGATE reported every K-rule unlinked forever; the
# union across roots is the fix, so assert it actually unions.
# Compute once and report the same value that was asserted. Building
# the detail string with a second, re-escaped copy of the pattern
# printed "0 K-ids" beside a passing ">5" assertion — a label that
# contradicts its own check is worse than no label.
srcs = source_files()
k_in_src = code_ids_over(srcs, r"\bK\d+\b")
check("kernel: ids union across many files, not just one",
code_ids_over([os.devnull], r"\bK\d+\b") == set() and len(k_in_src) > 5,
f"{len(k_in_src)} K-ids across {len(srcs)} files")
check("kernel: source roots resolve to real files",
len(srcs) >= 5, f"{len(srcs)} .rs files")
# The gate date must actually change behaviour, in both directions.
# A "binds later" that never binds is the AM-4 failure this replaces.
# What the gate must do depends on whether anything is unlinked, so
# compute that rather than assuming it. An earlier version hardcoded
# "unlinked rules exist today" and failed the moment T07 linked the
# last one — correctly, but for the wrong reason.
_k = parse_rules(open(os.path.join("specs", "GameKernel.md")).read(),
r"\*\*(K\d+)\*\*")
_named = code_ids_over(source_files(), r"\bK\d+\b")
_unlinked = [r for r in _k if r not in _named]
before = kernel_arm(today=datetime.date(2026, 1, 1), quiet=True)
after = kernel_arm(today=datetime.date(2027, 1, 1), quiet=True)
# The reporting path must be exercised, not only the quiet one. When
# this control ran `quiet=True` exclusively, a broken `say()` made
# every real `make coverage` die with RecursionError while the
# self-test printed all-ok — a positive control that named the
# behaviour without asserting it, which is exactly the defect
# CB-RES-0004 is about.
import io
from contextlib import redirect_stdout
buf = io.StringIO()
with redirect_stdout(buf):
loud = kernel_arm(today=datetime.date(2026, 1, 1))
out = buf.getvalue()
check("kernel: the reporting path actually prints",
loud == before and "AM-1b kernel spec->code link:" in out
and "gate:" in out,
f"{len(out.splitlines())} lines")
check("kernel: quiet suppresses output, loud does not",
out.strip() != "" and _silent_output() == "")
check("kernel: gate never fails before the binding date",
before == 0, f"before={before}")
check("kernel: after the binding date the gate fails iff rules are unlinked",
after == (2 if _unlinked else 0),
f"after={after}, {len(_unlinked)} unlinked"
+ (f" ({' '.join(_unlinked)})" if _unlinked else " — all linked"))
print("rule-coverage self-test (positive control)")
ok = True
for name, passed, detail in results:
print(f" [{'ok ' if passed else 'FAIL'}] {name}"
+ (f"{detail}" if detail else ""))
ok &= passed
return 0 if ok else 1
def main():
# T01: inputs are repo-relative, so anchor to the repo rather than
# requiring the caller to `cd` first.
enter_root()
if "--self-test" in sys.argv:
return self_test()
rules = parse_rules(open("specs/GroundRules.md").read())
paths = sorted(glob.glob("scenarios/ground/*.yaml"))
# Positive control: refuse to report a percentage over nothing.
if not rules:
print("ERROR — no GR-rules parsed from specs/GroundRules.md; "
"refusing to report coverage", file=sys.stderr)
return 1
if not paths:
print("ERROR — no scenarios found in scenarios/ground/; "
"refusing to report coverage", file=sys.stderr)
return 1
covered = set()
for path in paths:
covered |= parse_covers(open(path).read())
known = set(rules)
hit = sorted(known & covered)
missing = [r for r in rules if r not in covered]
invented = sorted(covered - known)
# T09: the spec -> code -> scenario chain, made mechanical. A rule a
# scenario claims should also be named in the aggregate, or the claim
# rests on nothing but a tag.
code_ids = parse_code_ids(open(AGGREGATE).read())
unlinked = sorted((known & covered) - code_ids)
phantom = sorted(code_ids - known)
pct = 100 * len(hit) // len(rules)
linked = len((known & covered) & code_ids)
print(f"AM-1 rule coverage: {len(hit)}/{len(rules)} ({pct}%) "
f"over {len(paths)} scenarios")
print(f"AM-1b spec->code link: {linked}/{len(hit)} claimed rules also "
f"named in {AGGREGATE}")
print(" NOTE: counts tags; does not prove a scenario exercises what it names")
if unlinked:
print(" unlinked (claimed by a scenario, absent from the aggregate):")
print(" ", " ".join(unlinked))
if phantom:
print(" ERROR — rule id in code that the spec does not define:",
" ".join(phantom), file=sys.stderr)
return 1
# T08: provisional items are reported with an owner and an age.
prov = provisional_items(paths)
if prov:
import datetime
today = datetime.date.today()
print(f"\nprovisional U-item defaults: {len(prov)}")
unowned, stale = [], []
for path, owner, raised in prov:
age = "?"
if raised:
try:
age = (today - datetime.date.fromisoformat(raised)).days
except ValueError:
age = "?"
name = path.split("/")[-1]
print(f" {name:<34} owner={owner or 'NONE':<12} age={age}d")
if not owner:
unowned.append(name)
if isinstance(age, int) and age > PROVISIONAL_WARN_DAYS:
stale.append(f"{name} ({age}d)")
if unowned:
print(" WARN — provisional with no owner:", " ".join(unowned))
if stale:
print(f" WARN — provisional for over {PROVISIONAL_WARN_DAYS} days:",
" ".join(stale))
print(" NOTE: evidence files must list these; a ruling flips the "
"scenario, not the kernel")
if missing:
print(" uncovered:", " ".join(missing))
if invented:
print(" ERROR — claimed but not defined in the spec:", " ".join(invented),
file=sys.stderr)
return 1
kernel_rc = kernel_arm()
if kernel_rc:
return kernel_rc
return 0 if not missing else 2
def kernel_arm(today=None, quiet=False):
"""AM-1b over specs/GameKernel.md × every crate (CB-WP-0005 T01).
Link only — see the module docstring for why K-rules cannot use the
scenario `covers:` mechanism. Returns a non-zero code only once
KERNEL_GATES_FROM has passed.
"""
today = today or datetime.date.today()
def say(*a, **kw):
if not quiet:
print(*a, **kw)
spec = os.path.join("specs", "GameKernel.md")
rules = parse_rules(open(spec).read(), r"\*\*(K\d+)\*\*")
# The inherited positive control. A pattern that stops matching must
# abort, not report 0/0 as though it were an answer.
if not rules:
print(f"\nERROR — no K-rules parsed from {spec}; refusing to report "
f"kernel coverage", file=sys.stderr)
return 1
paths = source_files()
if not paths:
print("\nERROR — no source files found under "
f"{'/, '.join(SOURCE_ROOTS)}/; refusing to report kernel coverage",
file=sys.stderr)
return 1
named = code_ids_over(paths, r"\bK\d+\b")
known = set(rules)
linked = sorted(known & named)
unlinked = [r for r in rules if r not in named]
phantom = sorted(named - known)
days = (KERNEL_GATES_FROM - today).days
binding = days <= 0
pct = 100 * len(linked) // len(rules)
say(f"\nAM-1b kernel spec->code link: {len(linked)}/{len(rules)} ({pct}%) "
f"K-rules named across {len(paths)} source files")
say(" NOTE: link only — K-rules are kernel invariants with no scenario "
"mechanism; and this counts names, not assertions (see "
"`make mutation-check`)")
if binding:
say(f" gate: BINDING since {KERNEL_GATES_FROM}")
else:
say(f" gate: reporting only for {days} more day(s), binds "
f"{KERNEL_GATES_FROM} (ADR-0005 §5)")
if unlinked:
say(" unlinked (declared in the spec, named nowhere in source):")
say(" ", " ".join(unlinked))
if phantom:
say(" ERROR — K-id in code that the spec does not define:",
" ".join(phantom), file=sys.stderr)
return 1
if unlinked and binding:
return 2
return 0
if __name__ == "__main__":
sys.exit(main())