clay-borg/tools
tegwick 5816d334ad fix: the note form carried no session token, so every note was refused
Tier S (a fix inside a boundary; chaos d8=5, no override). Reported by the
maintainer: "I can't save notes, I get 'refused: no session token'."

The form posted to a bare `/note`. Control 1 requires the token on EVERY
request, so the guard refused all of them.

WHY THE TESTS MISSED IT IS THE PART WORTH RECORDING. I verified the note
channel over real HTTP and got 303 -- but I appended the token to the URL
by hand. I tested the ENDPOINT and not the PATH A PLAYER TAKES, so the one
thing standing between the feature and the user was the one thing not
exercised. Same family as timing the wrong span and counting the wrong
denominator: a correct measurement of the wrong subject.

Fixed with Guard::note_endpoint(), so the form's action carries the token
like every other request. The assertion now pins the token's PRESENCE
rather than the bare path, so reverting the fix turns it red.

Verified the way it should have been done first: read the form's `action`
out of the SERVED page and POST to exactly that, nothing added by hand.
303.

Clippy then flagged document_with_log at 8 arguments. It was right -- the
signature had grown across three passes -- so the two endpoints are now
one `Endpoints` struct rather than an #[allow]. They are one concept: the
guarded surface this page may talk to, one channel that becomes commands
and one that provably cannot.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-06 15:32:09 +02:00
..
cb-play fix: the note form carried no session token, so every note was refused 2026-08-06 15:32:09 +02:00
cb-sim CB-WP-0015: the two inert clauses, AM-7 scaling and AM-8 N=10 2026-08-02 14:07:08 +02:00
cb-cost.py CB-WP-0013-T02/T03: retire SH-3 as a gate; correct AM-4a and its target 2026-08-02 07:30:14 +02:00
dep-weight.py CB-WP-0019 T01/T02: AM-4b asks what a contributor acquires 2026-08-03 19:04:54 +02:00
design-baseline.py CB-WP-0026: collect the rulings -- ten answers that arrived and were never applied 2026-08-05 16:13:37 +02:00
design.py CB-WP-0026: collect the rulings -- ten answers that arrived and were never applied 2026-08-05 16:13:37 +02:00
edition-check.py CB-WP-0021 T01/T02/T05: the engine plays its own data — AM-7 blocks 2026-08-04 00:47:56 +02:00
facts.py CB-WP-0006 T07: implement K18, amend K14 2026-08-01 12:47:16 +02:00
gate-review.py CB-WP-0009-T02: gates.toml and make gate-review 2026-08-01 15:42:13 +02:00
loop-lint.py CB-WP-0019 T03/T04: the cost rule written down, and the lifecycle 2026-08-03 19:25:18 +02:00
mutation-check.py CB-WP-0021 T06: fix AM-7's measurement, not its floor 2026-08-04 01:10:38 +02:00
replay-test.py CB-WP-0006 T06: K10 replay bundles, --replay, and AM-7 re-earned 2026-08-01 11:05:37 +02:00
repo.py CB-WP-0004 T01: fix environment friction at the root 2026-07-31 10:13:52 +02:00
rule-coverage.py CB-WP-0026: collect the rulings -- ten answers that arrived and were never applied 2026-08-05 16:13:37 +02:00
runtime-metrics.py Fix the AM-5 instrument to measure quietly; the breach was not real 2026-08-01 10:37:25 +02:00
size-metrics.py CB-WP-0006 T02: instrument AM-2; report AM-3 blocked, with the argument 2026-07-31 18:38:15 +02:00
status.py status: a cancelled task is a closed one 2026-08-03 18:55:11 +02:00
task-done.py chore: mark T01/T02 done (measured: $2.33 + $1.68, 46 responses, opus-5) 2026-07-31 10:18:34 +02:00
trials.py CB-WP-0027 T01-T04: the commentary track 2026-08-06 10:37:46 +02:00