content-explorer/workplans/CONTENT-WP-0005-quality-parity.md
tegwick 5f8c2d0dae Register content-explorer workplans for State Hub projection.
Give the seed plans canonical CONTENT-WP frontmatter and task blocks, and classify the repo as infotech research so repo-onboard can project it.

Assistant: grok
Assistant-Session: 01a130f1-abfb-7d71-9cd6-a8b75ec7f95a
2026-10-12 18:35:28 +02:00

2.1 KiB

id type title domain repo status flavor depends_on created updated
CONTENT-WP-0005 workplan Quality system and upstream experience parity infotech content-explorer proposed implementation
CONTENT-WP-0004
2026-10-12 2026-10-12

Quality system and upstream experience parity

Measure architectural independence and UX faithfulness. Measurement can start during CONTENT-WP-0000. This plan closes after CONTENT-WP-0004.

CONTENT-WP-0007 compares one permitted pinned OnCo slice through the original implementation and Content Explorer. Public CI remains synthetic-only.

Work packages

Automate schema, ingest, UI, and end-to-end tests, including the two-domain switch.

id: CONTENT-WP-0005-T01
status: todo
priority: high

Run accessibility, screenshot comparison, core web vitals, and responsive audits.

id: CONTENT-WP-0005-T02
status: todo
priority: high

Report provenance completeness, stale counts, unresolved references, and ingestion failure classes.

id: CONTENT-WP-0005-T03
status: todo
priority: high

Document deviations from upstream and verify third-party notices.

id: CONTENT-WP-0005-T04
status: todo
priority: high

Harden inputs and public snapshot generation.

id: CONTENT-WP-0005-T05
status: todo
priority: high

Acceptance gates

Tests run in CI and show no material keyboard accessibility failures.

id: CONTENT-WP-0005-T06
status: todo
priority: high

Two unrelated domains pass all critical journeys.

id: CONTENT-WP-0005-T07
status: todo
priority: high

A source and license completeness report is available.

id: CONTENT-WP-0005-T08
status: todo
priority: high

Key risk

R7: tests approximate but do not prove usability. Log evidence and deviations in the workplan review before marking complete.

Evidence

Pull requests, test logs, pinned artifacts, screenshots, or a comparison report where applicable. Add ImplementationNotes.md and Review.md on completion. Do not mark a gate passed without a verifiable link.