core-hub/docs/specs/data-model.md
tegwick 0709262ffd
Some checks failed
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
CI Smoke / pytest-smoke (push) Failing after 2s
Build and Publish Container Image / build-and-push (push) Failing after 1m51s
feat(ecosystem): adopt hub-core dependency and CI pin gate (CORE-WP-0009)
Import slugify_or_default from hub-core, add contract tests, vendor hub-core in
Docker/Forgejo CI, document metadata isolation and pagination deferral, and
align INTENT/SCOPE with three-repo stack.
2026-07-11 01:26:53 +02:00

2.1 KiB

Data Model Spec

Purpose

Define the initial Core Hub entity model and the migration stance from State Hub and Inter-Hub.

Initial Entity Families

Coordination:

  • repositories
  • workstreams
  • workplans
  • tasks
  • progress events
  • messages
  • decisions

Framework:

  • hubs
  • hub capability manifests
  • API consumers
  • API keys or key references
  • widgets
  • widget types
  • interaction events
  • annotations and annotation threads
  • requirements
  • decision records
  • deployment records
  • outcome signals
  • policy scopes
  • registry facts

Operations:

  • request logs
  • auth audit metadata
  • migration batches
  • compatibility fixtures
  • import/export runs

Initial Persisted Framework Tables

The first replacement slice persists the framework resources that current Inter-Hub consumers need during bootstrap and smoke testing:

  • hubs
  • hub_capability_manifests
  • api_consumers
  • api_keys with hash and prefix only, never full key material
  • widgets
  • interaction_events
  • migration_runs for import summaries, bundle hashes, counts, and diagnostics

Migration Posture

  • Import Inter-Hub schema facts through explicit migrations or import tools, not ad hoc SQL editing.
  • Preserve identifiers where consumers or historical references depend on them.
  • Treat API key full values as non-recoverable unless an approved custody path says otherwise.
  • Store only hashes, prefixes, labels, and non-secret lifecycle metadata.
  • Record row counts, relationship checks, and fixture replays for every migration batch.

Resolved decisions (2026-07-09, CUST-WP-0057)

  • Workplan/task tables: State Hub remains canonical. Core Hub may index and display workplan data via HTTP ingestion later; it does not fork tables in this consolidation lane. See the-custodian/docs/hub-ecosystem-architecture.md.
  • Inter-Hub admin entities: Migrated as historical records where consumers depend on identifiers; deferred protected surfaces stay empty compatibility collections until a consumer requires them.

Open questions

  • Whether Core Hub adds a read-model ingestion path from State Hub progress/messages (STATE-WP-0074) or remains framework-only for coordination data.