coulomb-research/README.md
tegwick dbf610b7b6 Implement M2: claim/evidence discipline for CR-000 (CR-WP-0004)
Obtain CR-000's first independent criticism via a freshly spawned,
context-isolated agent instance with no prior authorship context
(CR-000-X003-X007 in criticism.md). It found two internal-consistency
violations self-criticism had missed: CR-000-C006's cited evidence was
circular (X003) and conflated manuscript assertion with a real Evidence
object (X004), so C006 is now contested and its evidence withdrawn. It
also flagged that self-criticism had concentrated on infrastructure while
leaving substantive claims unchallenged (X005), an unlabeled overreach in
the Abstract (X006, now fixed), and a provenance-field ambiguity (X007).

Add evidence.md's first two entries (CR-000-E001, CR-000-E002), both
explicitly assessed as weak and left conjectural rather than inflated to
supported. Add scripts/query_paper_graph.py, a minimal read-only script
answering claim/evidence/criticism relation queries without manual
grepping, as a partial response to CR-000-X001 (which remains open: it is
a query layer over flat files, not a real graph).

Revise manuscript.md (Abstract, SS11-14) and questions.md to reflect all of
the above; Q2 gets a provisional "mixed" answer.

Close CR-WP-0004 and hand off CR-WP-0005 (resolving remaining open
criticism, and obtaining organizationally- rather than only
procedurally-independent review) rather than starting M3, which this
workplan judges premature while CR-000 still has open internal-consistency
findings.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: sonnet
Assistant-Process: 228422@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 49089735-86e1-4d29-8a6e-74c26947f8c4
2026-09-28 20:37:35 +02:00

1.5 KiB

Coulomb Research

A self-improving research network where humans and artificial intelligences create, criticize, test, and reuse knowledge.

This repository is currently a documentation and research seed. Start with:

  • Intent — mission and constitutional principles.
  • Scope — current state and implementation boundaries.
  • Design seed — kernel, publication interface, signals, and charts.
  • Milestone plan — artifact-driven development.
  • Work records — implementation tracking through State Hub.
  • Agent instructions — repository workflow and sync commands.
  • Artifact convention — program/paper/ claim identifier and file-layout conventions.
  • Paper registry — authoritative index of registered papers, currently just CR-000 (Paper Zero, RP-000).

M0 (research facility skeleton), M1 (Paper Zero v0.1 manuscript), and a first pass of M2 (claim/evidence discipline) are implemented. The next implementation is resolving CR-000's outstanding criticism before M3 is judged ready. There is no application to install, test, build, or run yet. For documentation changes, run git diff --check and review links, YAML, and work-record structure.