email-connect/workplans/EMAIL-WP-0005-test-mailbox-harness.md
tegwick 9c0d6f1b40
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 1s
Add EMAIL-WP-0005 test mailbox harness workplan
Plans a Maildir mailbox source, a containerized SMTP/IMAP test server,
deterministic test-user mailboxes, and end-to-end send-and-scan integration
tests, so automated test environments get mail accounts for test users without
a live provider.

Records the decision to use a purpose-built test server rather than integrating
s/qmail, and keeps bounce/complaint/deferral evidence on fixtures plus an
optional provider simulator tier.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 01:26:25 +02:00

8.9 KiB

id type title domain repo status owner topic_slug created updated
EMAIL-WP-0005 workplan Test Mailbox Harness for Automated Test Environments infotech email-connect proposed claude custodian 2026-08-14 2026-08-14

EMAIL-WP-0005 - Test Mailbox Harness for Automated Test Environments

1. Purpose

Automated test environments need mail accounts for test users so that end-to-end flows (invitation send, verification, return-path evidence) can be exercised without a production provider and without hand-crafted fixtures for every case.

This workplan adds a test mailbox harness: a Maildir mailbox source, a containerized SMTP/IMAP test server, deterministic test-user accounts, and end-to-end tests that drive /v1/send into the harness and scan the resulting mailboxes back out through the existing scanner.

The harness is test infrastructure. It does not make email-connect a mail provider or an MTA operator, and it must not weaken the evidence discipline: mail observed in a test server is still provider/MX-level fact, never proof of delivery, awareness, identity, or authorization.

2. User Story

As a developer or CI job, I want to start one container, send invitation and verification mail through email-connect to per-test mailboxes, and then scan those mailboxes with the normal scanner path, so that I can assert on end-to-end behavior without a live provider and without network egress.

3. In Scope

  • A maildir mailbox source alongside the existing fixture and imap sources.
  • A containerized SMTP + IMAP test server for integration tests.
  • Deterministic per-test-user account provisioning and reset.
  • End-to-end tests: send through the transactional service, scan through the scanner, assert evidence rows.
  • A documented strategy for bounce/complaint/deferral realism, which local servers cannot generate honestly.
  • Documentation and a decision record for the chosen approach.

4. Out of Scope

  • Operating a production or internet-facing MTA.
  • Owning DNS, TLS certificates, rDNS, SPF/DKIM/DMARC, or spam filtering.
  • Mailbox write-back actions (the scanner stays read-only; mark_seen remains rejected).
  • A mailbox management UI or user-facing account provisioning.
  • Replacing the fixture path as the default test source.
  • Integrating s/qmail — see DECISIONS.md, "Test mailbox harness: purpose-built test server over s/qmail".

5. Design Constraints

The harness must respect the existing seams rather than introduce new ones:

mailbox.protocol     fixture | imap | maildir     (src/email_connect/mailbox.py)
SMTP provider        EMAIL_CONNECT_SMTP_HOST/PORT (src/email_connect/transactional.py)

Pointing tests at the harness must require configuration only, not code branching inside the scanner or the transactional application. No test-only code paths may exist in the production send or scan logic.

The fixture source remains the default for unit tests: deterministic, offline, no container required. The harness is the integration tier.

6. Evidence Semantics

Mail retrieved from a test server carries exactly the same evidence ceiling as mail retrieved from a real mailbox. Specifically, the harness must not be used to justify any of:

message was delivered to a real inbox
recipient became aware of the message
recipient identity was verified
recipient was authorized

A test-server acceptance is provider_accepted and nothing more. Tests that assert stronger claims are defects in the test, not features of the harness.

7. Work Packages

T01 - Maildir mailbox source

id: EMAIL-WP-0005-T01
status: todo
priority: high

Tasks:

Add protocol: maildir to config and AppConfig validation
Implement MaildirMailboxSource reading new/ and cur/ per Maildir spec
Derive stable message identity from Maildir filename plus existing dedup keys
Support incremental scans via scan_cursors for maildir sources
Preserve raw_message_ref as a maildir:// reference
Reject mark_seen for maildir the same way IMAP does
Wire the source into source_for_config
Add unit tests over a temporary Maildir tree

Acceptance:

The scanner reads a Maildir directory, classifies messages, and produces the
same evidence rows as the equivalent fixture directory, with deduplication and
incremental cursors working across repeated scans.

T02 - Containerized SMTP/IMAP test server

id: EMAIL-WP-0005-T02
status: todo
priority: high

Tasks:

Select and pin a test mail server image providing SMTP and IMAP
Add a compose or container definition under a test harness directory
Expose SMTP and IMAP on fixed local ports with non-secret test credentials
Document startup, teardown, and health check
Add a config profile pointing mailbox.protocol imap at the harness
Add a config profile pointing the SMTP provider env vars at the harness
Ensure the harness never binds a routable interface by default

Acceptance:

One documented command starts a local mail server; the scanner can complete an
IMAP scan against it and the transactional service can complete a send to it,
using committed non-secret test credentials only.

Notes:

Preferred candidate is GreenMail, which serves SMTP and IMAP and creates
accounts on demand. Mailpit is the fallback for send-side-only inspection and
does not exercise the IMAP source. Record the choice in DECISIONS.md.

T03 - Test-user account provisioning and reset

id: EMAIL-WP-0005-T03
status: todo
priority: high

Tasks:

Define the test-user address convention and test domain
Provide a helper to create or address per-test mailboxes deterministically
Provide per-test reset so state does not leak between tests
Keep test credentials non-secret and committed, never routed through OpenBao
Document the convention and the reset contract

Acceptance:

A test can obtain an isolated mailbox for a named test user, send to it, read
it back, and reset it, with no cross-test interference and no real credentials
involved.

Notes:

Test credentials are deliberately non-secret and belong in the repo. Per
.claude/rules/credential-routing.md, OpenBao and warden route are for real
provider material; the harness must not touch them.

T04 - End-to-end send-and-scan integration tests

id: EMAIL-WP-0005-T04
status: todo
priority: high

Tasks:

Add an integration test tier that is skipped when the harness is unavailable
Drive /v1/send invitation and verification flows into harness mailboxes
Scan the resulting mailboxes through the normal scanner path
Assert evidence rows, evidence_ceiling, and absence of overclaiming
Cover idempotency and duplicate-request behavior end to end
Cover suppression behavior end to end
Ensure the default unit test run stays offline and container-free

Acceptance:

An integration run proves send-to-scan continuity against a live local server,
while the default test run remains offline, deterministic, and unchanged.

T05 - Bounce, complaint, and deferral realism

id: EMAIL-WP-0005-T05
status: todo
priority: medium

Tasks:

Document that local servers do not generate realistic DSNs, complaints, or deferrals
Keep crafted .eml fixtures as the deterministic path for those classes
Add a helper to inject fixture messages into a harness mailbox or Maildir
Define an optional staging tier using provider simulator addresses
Document which evidence classes are only reachable in the staging tier

Acceptance:

Every evidence class the parser recognizes has a documented, reachable test
path, and the limits of the local harness are stated explicitly rather than
papered over.

T06 - Documentation and decision record

id: EMAIL-WP-0005-T06
status: todo
priority: medium

Tasks:

Write a test harness tutorial covering start, send, scan, assert, reset
Extend docs/mailbox-report-tutorial.md with the maildir source
Record the DECISIONS.md entry for the harness approach and the s/qmail rejection
Document the three test tiers: fixture unit, harness integration, provider staging
Document the evidence ceiling that applies to harness-observed mail

Acceptance:

A new contributor can start the harness, run the integration tier, and
correctly state what harness-observed mail does and does not prove.

8. Completion Criteria

This workplan is complete when:

  1. mailbox.protocol: maildir is supported, tested, and documented.
  2. A pinned containerized SMTP/IMAP test server starts from one documented command with committed non-secret credentials.
  3. Test users get isolated, resettable mailboxes by convention.
  4. Integration tests prove send-to-scan continuity while the default test run stays offline and container-free.
  5. Every recognized evidence class has a documented, reachable test path, with local-harness limits stated explicitly.
  6. Documentation and the decision record are in place, including the evidence ceiling for harness-observed mail.