tegwick
a835c11ae7
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra Assistant-Session: 01a101af-e240-7882-a1e3-e37720cbdbea
53 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
53 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
# Adoption review package
|
|
|
|
EMERGENT-WP-0002 remains the live work record. This is the concrete review
|
|
package for its remaining gates; it is not an approval or a completed rollout.
|
|
|
|
## Doctrine and publication — T02 / T09
|
|
|
|
Requested reviewers: gate-house, net-kingdom, access-engine, security-canon;
|
|
tenant/zone/credential/observation owners for their respective mappings.
|
|
|
|
Review `docs/decisions/EMERGENT-DEC-2026-001-integration-profile.md`,
|
|
`docs/operational-contracts.md`, `docs/netkingdom-integration-map.md`, and the
|
|
12 cards. Decide whether these are an accurate orientation profile of current
|
|
owner boundaries and where the profile should be published/linked long term.
|
|
Specifically settle the reference-evaluator boundary, historical Gate-House
|
|
broker label, unavailable containment, build-mode limits and orthogonal scope
|
|
dimensions. This asks for documentation/integration disposition, not runtime
|
|
privilege or an amendment by an agent to its own authority.
|
|
|
|
Local disposition: source-backed, non-normative pilot. Existing owner contracts
|
|
continue to govern. No outside repository's policy or service was changed.
|
|
Eight instruction-file additions in four repos point to the common package;
|
|
their exact block has a tested rollback in `tools/pilot_entrypoints.py`.
|
|
|
|
## Agent sessions and independent evaluation — T05 / T07 / T08
|
|
|
|
The provider reports in `docs/evidence/` separate file-reading proof, scenario
|
|
answers, client/model metadata, and the implementing agent's semantic review.
|
|
They are not independent whitehat evidence. Requested next review:
|
|
whitehat-security applies its own offline adversarial judgment to the package,
|
|
retrieval tests and scenario corpus; no live targets or attack execution are
|
|
requested by this package.
|
|
|
|
Actual resume/compaction behavior and governed glas-harness sessions remain
|
|
separate proofs. The reload code is tested, and fresh sessions are exercised;
|
|
neither proves what an actual provider preserves after compaction. Honor the
|
|
blocked/unverified owner profile states. CUST-WP-0073 and GLAS-WP-0008 already
|
|
own credential/isolation/readiness concerns; this package does not close them.
|
|
|
|
The four real-repository read-only pilot reports cover doctrine, access,
|
|
tenant-envelope escalation and production-change routing. These are bounded
|
|
comprehension proofs, not live-effect exercises or broad tenant assurance.
|
|
|
|
## Fleet adoption — T09 / T10
|
|
|
|
After the above gates, publish an exact reviewed release, validate any changed
|
|
source references, and use the existing authorized standing-notice process to
|
|
track reach. Track understanding with scenarios rather than acknowledgments.
|
|
No global agent configuration or fleet broadcast was installed by this pilot.
|
|
|
|
Retain the 30-day source review deadline, source-change invalidation, and
|
|
withdrawal handling. A source check is not current authorization. Do not mark
|
|
the workplan finished until its provider, owner and rollout evidence exists.
|