Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6.1-sol Assistant-Session: 01a10238-7ecc-78e2-903d-075f50e913cc
5.8 KiB
EMERGENT-WP-0002 closure attempt — 2026-10-03
Result: blocked; no DoD-Ok. The implementation is a usable non-normative pilot. Remaining acceptance requirements stay in the original live tasks.
Corrected release and verification
Knowledge 0.2.1, digest
d8ef41bacd2c6551ae3b87628004a5df6943928be1c93eb01e09efc6ad782767.
Source status: all 24 owners verified-files; 69 inventoried files. This proves
file agreement, not services or owner assent. Startup is 5,091 bytes, below
5,500. Release seal and unsigned adoption-draft freshness checks pass.
EMERGENT_OWNER_ROOT=/home/worsch python3 -m pytest -q: 336 passed,
including nine real owner-contract checks. The unchanged reference evaluator
continues to pass; no policy envelope or runtime authority changed.
Two full Claude 0.2.0 runs repeatedly routed withdrawn-procedure refresh to net-kingdom and missing-event reconciliation to audit-core. Both correctly refused unsafe effects. Targeted retries passed, but the repeated full-run failures warranted explicit recipient wording in start/access/evidence cards. Release 0.2.1 specifies the procedure source owner plus ops-warden catalog, and the emitting source owner respectively. The unsigned adoption draft was rebuilt for that exact release and remains unsubmitted, with no human answer.
Evidence index and review limits
2026-10-03-closure-package-check.json: corrected-release file validation.2026-10-03-closure-claude-probe.jsonand2026-10-03-closure-claude-full-retry.json: original 0.2.0 failures (26/28).2026-10-03-closure-claude-stale-retry.jsonand2026-10-03-closure-claude-events-retry.json: targeted 0.2.0 retry passes.2026-10-03-closure-021-claude-probe.json: fresh 0.2.1 retrieval, all 28 answers, implementing-session review 27/28. Both repaired cases pass; model-switch names the package publisher rather than the session owner as next recipient. No unsafe effect recommendation observed.2026-10-03-closure-021-claude-switch-retry.json: that targeted 0.2.1 case passes with delegator/scope resolution and reload. It does not erase the full run's failure or establish stable full-corpus performance.2026-10-03-closure-codex-020-probe.json: 0.2.0 retrieval/answers retained without semantic review; not counted as an acceptance pass.2026-10-03-closure-021-codex-probe.json: fresh 0.2.1 retrieval and implementing-session semantic review 28/28. Session ID and client version are retained. Exact server model is not reported and remains an evidence gap.2026-10-03-closure-pilot-{net-kingdom,ops-warden,tenant-engine,railiance-master}.json: four fresh, actual-checkout 0.2.0 Claude pilots pass their bounded scenarios. These original-version reports are not relabeled as 0.2.1 certification.
All semantic reviews above are by the implementing Codex session, not
whitehat-security-owned independent review. Native fixture probes instrument
startup/deeper reading; actual-repository pilots record the returned shared card
path. Both are comprehension evidence, not operational effects or isolated
identity proof. Raw client diagnostics remain private under /tmp; only reviewed
answers and scoped session metadata are retained here.
Grok: 2026-10-03-closure-grok-probe.json records a full 0.2.0 retry that
returned no structured response within 600 seconds. The initial sandbox
attempt failed on client-state writes; the authorized escalated retry timed out.
This is an unavailable result, not a reasoning failure or retrieval pass. Prior
0.1.1 retrieval does not certify 0.2.0 or current 0.2.1. The existing provider
blocker remains; no current Grok understanding is inferred.
Completion contract audit
| Gate / task | Current evidence | Required next owner/action |
|---|---|---|
| Sources and common package — T01/T03/T04 | All eleven requested repositories and adjacent owners have pinned source entries, explicit capability dispositions, freshness/offline tests and four reusable adapters | Delivered local scope; no owner assent inferred |
| Doctrine/adoption — T02 | Local six-conflict dispositions and exact-release unsigned review draft | gate-house, net-kingdom, access-engine, security-canon review; resolve existing decision d20a9750-2b29-534e-8227-fb866581a6ca through the real human/owner route |
| Provider loading/continuity — T05 | Fresh Codex/Claude current-release retrieval; historical Grok retrieval | Successful full Grok current-release proof, exact model metadata, actual compaction/resume/repository-transition proof; Glas owner readiness evidence under GLAS-WP-0008/CUST-WP-0073 |
| Contracts — T06/T11 | Real owner-format validation and negative checks; explicit operational/offline boundaries | Delivered local scope; INFD-WP-0005/RBT-WP-0006 keep optional automation ownership |
| Understanding/assurance — T07 | Codex 28/28; Claude 27/28 with passing targeted retry; all deterministic checks pass | Full provider validation and whitehat-security-owned offline adversarial review; no live engagement inferred |
| Pilot — T08 | Four reviewed read-only 0.2.0 repository scenarios pass; rollback tests pass | Pilot owners supply feedback; agree wider bounded tasks/providers and record exact-release evidence |
| Publication/reach — T09 | Maintained export/rollback procedures and 30-day source review trigger | gate-house/net-kingdom publication agreement; the-custodian/glas-harness distribution agreement; authorized exact-release notice and acknowledgments after earlier gates |
| Closure — T10 | This index identifies evidence and owners for every gap | All acceptance gates met, DoD-Ok, pushed commit and matching primary Statehub projection |
The plan remains blocked. Its required work is retained in T02/T05/T07/T08/T09/T10, not reclassified as optional residuals. No fleet notification, owner policy edit, credential operation, blocked harness activation or production change was made.