tegwick
f9cba6fb35
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6.1-sol Assistant-Session: 01a10238-7ecc-78e2-903d-075f50e913cc
77 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
77 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
# EMERGENT-WP-0002 closure attempt — 2026-10-03
|
|
|
|
**Result: blocked; no DoD-Ok.** The implementation is a usable non-normative
|
|
pilot. Remaining acceptance requirements stay in the original live tasks.
|
|
|
|
## Corrected release and verification
|
|
|
|
Knowledge **0.2.1**, digest
|
|
`d8ef41bacd2c6551ae3b87628004a5df6943928be1c93eb01e09efc6ad782767`.
|
|
Source status: all 24 owners `verified-files`; 69 inventoried files. This proves
|
|
file agreement, not services or owner assent. Startup is 5,091 bytes, below
|
|
5,500. Release seal and unsigned adoption-draft freshness checks pass.
|
|
`EMERGENT_OWNER_ROOT=/home/worsch python3 -m pytest -q`: **336 passed**,
|
|
including nine real owner-contract checks. The unchanged reference evaluator
|
|
continues to pass; no policy envelope or runtime authority changed.
|
|
|
|
Two full Claude 0.2.0 runs repeatedly routed withdrawn-procedure refresh to
|
|
net-kingdom and missing-event reconciliation to audit-core. Both correctly
|
|
refused unsafe effects. Targeted retries passed, but the repeated full-run
|
|
failures warranted explicit recipient wording in start/access/evidence cards.
|
|
Release 0.2.1 specifies the procedure source owner plus ops-warden catalog, and
|
|
the emitting source owner respectively. The unsigned adoption draft was rebuilt
|
|
for that exact release and remains unsubmitted, with no human answer.
|
|
|
|
## Evidence index and review limits
|
|
|
|
- `2026-10-03-closure-package-check.json`: corrected-release file validation.
|
|
- `2026-10-03-closure-claude-probe.json` and
|
|
`2026-10-03-closure-claude-full-retry.json`: original 0.2.0 failures (26/28).
|
|
- `2026-10-03-closure-claude-stale-retry.json` and
|
|
`2026-10-03-closure-claude-events-retry.json`: targeted 0.2.0 retry passes.
|
|
- `2026-10-03-closure-021-claude-probe.json`: fresh 0.2.1 retrieval, all 28
|
|
answers, implementing-session review **27/28**. Both repaired cases pass;
|
|
model-switch names the package publisher rather than the session owner as
|
|
next recipient. No unsafe effect recommendation observed.
|
|
- `2026-10-03-closure-021-claude-switch-retry.json`: that targeted 0.2.1 case
|
|
passes with delegator/scope resolution and reload. It does not erase the full
|
|
run's failure or establish stable full-corpus performance.
|
|
- `2026-10-03-closure-codex-020-probe.json`: 0.2.0 retrieval/answers retained
|
|
without semantic review; not counted as an acceptance pass.
|
|
- `2026-10-03-closure-021-codex-probe.json`: fresh 0.2.1 retrieval and
|
|
implementing-session semantic review **28/28**. Session ID and client version
|
|
are retained. Exact server model is not reported and remains an evidence gap.
|
|
- `2026-10-03-closure-pilot-{net-kingdom,ops-warden,tenant-engine,railiance-master}.json`:
|
|
four fresh, actual-checkout 0.2.0 Claude pilots pass their bounded scenarios.
|
|
These original-version reports are not relabeled as 0.2.1 certification.
|
|
|
|
All semantic reviews above are by the implementing Codex session, not
|
|
whitehat-security-owned independent review. Native fixture probes instrument
|
|
startup/deeper reading; actual-repository pilots record the returned shared card
|
|
path. Both are comprehension evidence, not operational effects or isolated
|
|
identity proof. Raw client diagnostics remain private under `/tmp`; only reviewed
|
|
answers and scoped session metadata are retained here.
|
|
|
|
Grok: `2026-10-03-closure-grok-probe.json` records a full 0.2.0 retry that
|
|
returned no structured response within **600 seconds**. The initial sandbox
|
|
attempt failed on client-state writes; the authorized escalated retry timed out.
|
|
This is an unavailable result, not a reasoning failure or retrieval pass. Prior
|
|
0.1.1 retrieval does not certify 0.2.0 or current 0.2.1. The existing provider
|
|
blocker remains; no current Grok understanding is inferred.
|
|
|
|
## Completion contract audit
|
|
|
|
| Gate / task | Current evidence | Required next owner/action |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| Sources and common package — T01/T03/T04 | All eleven requested repositories and adjacent owners have pinned source entries, explicit capability dispositions, freshness/offline tests and four reusable adapters | Delivered local scope; no owner assent inferred |
|
|
| Doctrine/adoption — T02 | Local six-conflict dispositions and exact-release unsigned review draft | gate-house, net-kingdom, access-engine, security-canon review; resolve existing decision `d20a9750-2b29-534e-8227-fb866581a6ca` through the real human/owner route |
|
|
| Provider loading/continuity — T05 | Fresh Codex/Claude current-release retrieval; historical Grok retrieval | Successful full Grok current-release proof, exact model metadata, actual compaction/resume/repository-transition proof; Glas owner readiness evidence under GLAS-WP-0008/CUST-WP-0073 |
|
|
| Contracts — T06/T11 | Real owner-format validation and negative checks; explicit operational/offline boundaries | Delivered local scope; INFD-WP-0005/RBT-WP-0006 keep optional automation ownership |
|
|
| Understanding/assurance — T07 | Codex 28/28; Claude 27/28 with passing targeted retry; all deterministic checks pass | Full provider validation and whitehat-security-owned offline adversarial review; no live engagement inferred |
|
|
| Pilot — T08 | Four reviewed read-only 0.2.0 repository scenarios pass; rollback tests pass | Pilot owners supply feedback; agree wider bounded tasks/providers and record exact-release evidence |
|
|
| Publication/reach — T09 | Maintained export/rollback procedures and 30-day source review trigger | gate-house/net-kingdom publication agreement; the-custodian/glas-harness distribution agreement; authorized exact-release notice and acknowledgments after earlier gates |
|
|
| Closure — T10 | This index identifies evidence and owners for every gap | All acceptance gates met, DoD-Ok, pushed commit and matching primary Statehub projection |
|
|
|
|
The plan remains blocked. Its required work is retained in T02/T05/T07/T08/T09/T10,
|
|
not reclassified as optional residuals. No fleet notification, owner policy edit,
|
|
credential operation, blocked harness activation or production change was made.
|