tegwick
df6acad828
fix-consistency C-06/C-11 registered ESRC-WP-0002..0004 and the ESRC-WP-0001 tasks; IDs written back into the workplan files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
50 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
50 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: ESRC-WP-0004
|
|
type: workplan
|
|
title: "Local citation recovery and external source discovery hooks"
|
|
domain: infotech
|
|
repo: evidence-source
|
|
status: proposed
|
|
owner: codex
|
|
topic_slug: citation_evidence_mvp
|
|
created: "2026-07-08"
|
|
updated: "2026-07-08"
|
|
spec_refs:
|
|
- INTENT.md
|
|
- README.md
|
|
state_hub_workstream_id: "2ce8b799-d67c-4dbf-aac5-0ff1f0363d62"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# ESRC-WP-0004 — Citation recovery and source discovery hooks
|
|
|
|
`evidence-source`'s original intent includes recovering citations when a stored
|
|
selector goes stale and discovering the external source a document was drawn
|
|
from. This is the largest deferred strand and depends on the anchoring layer's
|
|
selector model.
|
|
|
|
## Open questions
|
|
|
|
- What is the recovery contract — does this repo *detect* stale selectors, or
|
|
only provide the re-ingest/re-fingerprint primitives the anchor layer calls?
|
|
- Where does external source discovery (URL/DOI resolution) belong relative to
|
|
`citation-engine` and the umbrella?
|
|
|
|
## Sketch
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: ESRC-WP-0004-T01
|
|
status: todo
|
|
priority: low
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "e7ff29b9-f04f-44f5-a23a-b028fc20a80b"
|
|
```
|
|
Design the recovery boundary with the anchor layer: define what
|
|
`evidence-source` owns vs. what stays in anchoring.
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: ESRC-WP-0004-T02
|
|
status: todo
|
|
priority: low
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "88a512d1-70e0-4bfa-b6b0-c1e4e31abb97"
|
|
```
|
|
Prototype re-ingest/re-fingerprint recovery primitives and a discovery hook
|
|
interface (no network coupling baked into the core).
|