flex-auth/SCOPE.md
tegwick c473f1971d
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 1s
Build and Publish Container Image / build-and-push (push) Successful in 37s
feat(authz): bind decisions to exact actions
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-5.6-sol
Assistant-Session: 01a02e47-6aac-7ee1-914d-0584c75d3c81
2026-08-23 13:18:26 +02:00

10 KiB

flex-auth Scope

One-liner

flex-auth is a policy-as-code authorization registry and control plane for NetKingdom-aligned systems.

Core Idea

flex-auth turns verified identity claims, resource manifests, relationship facts, policy packages, and request context into inspectable authorization decisions. It is intentionally separate from identity providers and from the applications that enforce decisions.

The product should start as a useful standalone local authorization system, then grow into delegated mode where Topaz, OpenFGA, SpiceDB, OPA, Cedar, Keycloak Authorization Services, Entra, Graph, SCIM, LDAP, and similar systems can be coordinated behind a stable flex-auth API.

In Scope

  • Protected-system registration.
  • Resource namespaces, resource hierarchy, and action vocabularies.
  • Subject, group, team, tenant, role, and service-account records needed for authorization.
  • Relationship facts and inherited access.
  • Versioned policy packages with metadata, fixtures, validation, tests, and activation state.
  • Deterministic check, batch-check, list-allowed, explain, and decision-record capabilities.
  • Local decision logs with policy version and provenance.
  • CLI and service entry points for local development and integration tests.
  • Markitect as the first concrete protected-system consumer.
  • Delegated PDP and directory adapter boundaries after the standalone core is stable.

Out of Scope

  • Acting as an identity provider.
  • Replacing key-cape, NetKingdom SSO, Keycloak, Entra, or other identity systems.
  • Owning login, MFA, PKCE, token issuance, token lifecycle, or canonical identity profile behavior.
  • Embedding protected-system enforcement logic inside flex-auth.
  • Making Markitect-specific assumptions part of the generic authorization model.
  • Forcing a single PDP backend or directory provider.
  • Hiding policy behavior behind opaque administrative toggles.

Relevant When

  • A protected system needs resource-specific authorization decisions.
  • A team needs policy-as-code packages that can be reviewed, tested, versioned, and explained.
  • Authorization must combine identity claims, groups, roles, tenants, relationships, context, and resource metadata.
  • A local development workflow needs deterministic authorization behavior before enterprise PDP integrations exist.
  • Markitect resources need central authorization decisions and durable audit records.
  • A delegated backend needs to be introduced without changing the protected-system-facing API.

Not Relevant When

  • The task is only about authentication, login, token issuance, or MFA.
  • The desired outcome can be handled by coarse identity-provider roles alone.
  • The protected system only needs local development labels and no central policy administration.
  • A team is choosing identity-provider configuration rather than resource-specific authorization.

Current State

The standalone core is implemented and all seven baseline workplans (FLEX-WP-0001 through FLEX-WP-0007) are complete. The repository carries the intent baseline, authorization landscape research, ADR set, and a working Go service (cmd/flex-auth) with validate, load-registry, serve, and POST /v1/check plus registry, policy, decision, audit, Markitect, and delegated-adapter internals. The standalone policy-as-code core (FLEX-WP-0002), Markitect consumer integration (FLEX-WP-0003, manifest ingest, decisions, and fixtures), and the delegated PDP/directory adapter shapes (FLEX-WP-0004, Topaz/OpenFGA/OPA/Cedar/Keycloak/Entra tradeoffs documented with at least one controlled adapter shape) all landed in May 2026.

Standalone decisions include a structured binding containing the normalized subject, action, resource, context, and a full request digest. This makes the execute-time decision contract inspectable without parsing reason or diagnostic prose. Durable human approval lifecycle, supersession, and authenticated multi-approver evidence remain State Hub responsibilities; the proposed cross-system object is documented in schemas/action_authorization.schema.json and is not yet a deployed State Hub endpoint.

The first shipped protected-system consumer is ops-warden: its opt-in pre-sign gate calls POST /v1/check for resource.type: ssh-certificate, action: sign decisions (examples/ops-warden/, policy package, allow/deny fixtures, and tests). FLEX-WP-0006 published that gate and FLEX-WP-0007 deployed flex-auth as a reachable production runtime for it. The joint OpenBao-backed smoke is verified (2026-06-29: vault-backed allow recorded decision:032b096c433ad80c; TTL-over-max denied ttl_out_of_bounds by flex-auth before OpenBao). FLEX-WP-0016 then shipped an independently rollable in-cluster ops-warden pin and moved it to callerAuth.mode: enforce once ops-warden adopted a calling identity (WARDEN-WP-0031): anonymous /v1/check is 401, a token bound to another protected system is 403.

Production policy.enabled is deliberately off, and is not coming back as a boolean. ops-warden's ADR-0006 (2026-08-19) defers it permanently: policy.enabled is one repo-wide flag, and with fail_closed: true it makes flex-auth a hard dependency of every warden sign — including the SSH certificates the ops-bridge tunnels depend on, one of which carries the policy call itself. Enforcement is being rescoped to security zones (zone-engine ZONE-WP-0001, consumer side WARDEN-WP-0032). flex-auth reviewed that model as the PDP on 2026-08-19 and holds one boundary: zone membership compiles into the registry snapshot flex-auth already consumes (no schema change needed), while per-zone stance belongs in the versioned policy package, because registry content is absent from decision provenance. Fail-open is not expressible by a PDP at all and stays a consumer-side setting. The enforcing pins stay enforcing regardless — an enforcing pin with no enforcing consumer still turns the anonymous path into a 401 rather than a decision.

State Hub integration is present through:

  • .custodian-brief.md
  • state_hub_workstream_id fields in workplans
  • state_hub_task_id fields in task blocks
  • active State Hub dispatch for the flex-auth repo

How It Fits

flex-auth sits between identity and protected systems:

key-cape / NetKingdom SSO
  -> verified identity claims
  -> flex-auth authorization registry and policy decisions
  -> protected systems such as Markitect

Identity systems establish who the caller is and provide coarse claims. flex-auth decides what that caller can do to a specific resource under a specific context. Protected systems enforce the decision and keep their own local diagnostics.

Terminology

  • Subject: Human, service account, group, team, tenant, role, or emergency principal.
  • Resource: Protected object registered by a system.
  • Namespace: Resource type and ownership boundary.
  • Action: Operation requested against a resource.
  • Context: Request, environment, assurance, workflow, or runtime attributes.
  • Policy package: Versioned policy-as-code bundle with metadata and tests.
  • Relationship fact: Subject-resource or resource-resource relation.
  • Decision: Allow, deny, redact, audit-only, or not-applicable outcome with reason and provenance.
  • PDP: Policy decision point, either flex-auth standalone logic or a delegated backend.
  • PEP: Policy enforcement point in the protected system.
  • key-cape / NetKingdom SSO: identity source and coarse claims provider; flex-auth consumes the NetKingdom IAM Profile (~/net-kingdom/canon/standards/iam-profile_v0.2.md).
  • ops-warden: first shipped protected-system consumer. Its opt-in pre-sign gate calls flex-auth for ssh-certificate / sign decisions before issuing a short-lived SSH certificate (FLEX-WP-0006, FLEX-WP-0007). ops-warden owns the SSH CA, OpenBao signing, and actor inventory; flex-auth owns the policy decision. ops-warden's routing charter names flex-auth as the owner of every "may I perform action X?" question.
  • Markitect: first knowledge-pipeline consumer. Integration is complete on the flex-auth side (FLEX-WP-0003 — resource-manifest ingest, Markitect- compatible decisions, and fixtures); a live Markitect runtime calling the gate in production is the next consumer milestone after ops-warden.
  • Topaz: aligned evaluator. Per ADR-003 the standalone core is shaped to match Topaz's Rego + directory model from day one; the Topaz adapter in FLEX-WP-0004 is therefore a small step rather than a conversion.
  • OpenFGA and SpiceDB: candidate relationship authorization backends.
  • OPA and Cedar: candidate rule and typed-policy engines.
  • Keycloak Authorization Services: adapter path for Keycloak-centric deployments. Default architecture is "Keycloak as SSO only, flex-auth owns authorization"; Keycloak AuthZ is one optional delegated PDP.
  • Entra, Graph, SCIM, LDAP, and Keycloak APIs: directory and group resolver sources.

Disjoint From

  • ops-warden is a flex-auth consumer, not an overlap (see Related / Overlapping). The two remain disjoint on identity surface: ops-warden issues SSH certificates for ops actors (adm/agt/atm) and is not a resource-policy engine; flex-auth decides whether a given sign request is allowed and never issues certificates. The once-hypothetical flow of surfacing an agt actor as a flex-auth subject is now realized through the signing policy gate.
  • ops-bridge owns SSH reverse-tunnel connectivity and explicitly disclaims being a credential authority or policy engine. No overlap.

Provided Capabilities

type: orientation
title: Agent orientation
status: current
description: Repo intent, boundaries, research, workplan map, and State Hub agent brief are available for new coding agents.
type: workplan
title: Standalone policy core plan
status: planned
description: Workplan for schemas, local registry, policy packages, check APIs, list/explain, decision log, CLI/service skeleton, tests, and examples.
type: workplan
title: Markitect consumer integration plan
status: planned
description: Workplan for Markitect resource namespace, manifest import, action vocabulary, check fixtures, contract tests, and integration flow.
type: workplan
title: Delegated adapter plan
status: planned
description: Workplan for Topaz evaluation, relationship PDP adapters, rule PDP adapters, Keycloak AuthZ path, directory resolvers, and operations docs.