167 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown
167 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: FLEX-WP-0015
|
|
type: workplan
|
|
title: "Tenancy posture declaration and inbound caller authentication"
|
|
domain: infotech
|
|
repo: flex-auth
|
|
status: active
|
|
owner: claude
|
|
topic_slug: netkingdom
|
|
planning_priority: P1
|
|
planning_order: 150
|
|
depends_on_workplans: []
|
|
related_workplans:
|
|
- FLEX-WP-0004
|
|
- FLEX-WP-0011
|
|
created: "2026-08-17"
|
|
updated: "2026-08-17"
|
|
state_hub_workstream_id: "31846b19-c2a3-428e-950b-5985bc9146eb"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# FLEX-WP-0015 - Tenancy posture declaration and inbound caller authentication
|
|
|
|
Answer `rapp-postgres`'s review request on **NetKingdom Tenancy Posture v0.1**
|
|
(message `82ec43ce`), publish flex-auth's posture vector, and close the one
|
|
real defect the review surfaced.
|
|
|
|
**Review output:** `docs/tenancy-posture-review.md`
|
|
**Declaration:** `tenancy.yaml` (repo root, per framework §5.1)
|
|
|
|
## Why this workplan exists
|
|
|
|
Three of the framework's five axes describe flex-auth cleanly. Assessing
|
|
against them turned up two things we did not know we were carrying:
|
|
|
|
1. **`/v1/check` authenticates no caller.** Any workload with network reach to
|
|
the ClusterIP Service can assert any subject and any tenant and receive an
|
|
authoritative allow. flex-auth is the estate's authorization oracle and
|
|
trusts its callers completely. Framework level `A0`.
|
|
2. **The tenant-engine live-roles adapter is built and unwired.** No non-test
|
|
caller exists. The IAM Profile live re-query reads as a capability we have
|
|
and is not one.
|
|
|
|
The framework itself needs six amendments, two of them corrections of
|
|
statements it makes about flex-auth. Those are in the review document and go
|
|
back to `rapp-postgres` as review output, not as work here.
|
|
|
|
**Scope discipline:** this workplan closes flex-auth's own gaps and answers
|
|
the review. It does not build fleet-level conformance tooling, does not adopt
|
|
AuthZEN, and does not touch production enforcement (`policy.enabled` stays off
|
|
per FLEX-WP-0007).
|
|
|
|
## Tasks
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: FLEX-WP-0015-T01
|
|
status: done
|
|
priority: high
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "0a32500d-511a-4bd7-972e-de4cd3e62dd9"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Publish posture and answer the review.** Write `tenancy.yaml` and
|
|
`docs/tenancy-posture-review.md`; reply to `rapp-postgres` with the posture
|
|
vector, the A4 ruling, the internal-hop ruling, and the two factual
|
|
corrections. Done 2026-08-17.
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: FLEX-WP-0015-T02
|
|
status: wait
|
|
priority: high
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "b2e87a81-b63d-4be4-ad44-01426b7e6f74"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Close the A0 — authenticate callers of `/v1/check`.** Decide first, build
|
|
second: this is a production-facing security boundary on a service two
|
|
consumers already depend on, and the wrong instrument is worse than the delay.
|
|
|
|
**Waiting on `ops-warden`** (asked 2026-08-17): it owns how workloads prove
|
|
identity in this estate, and it is a flex-auth PEP, so it implements the
|
|
calling side of whatever we choose. `warden route find` was run first per the
|
|
credential-routing rules — the catalog holds credential lanes and has no entry
|
|
for service-to-service caller authentication as a pattern, which is part of
|
|
what was asked. Our stated instinct is ServiceAccount TokenReview; the
|
|
question is open pending their answer. Nothing is built until it lands.
|
|
|
|
Record an ADR covering at minimum:
|
|
|
|
- What identifies a caller — Kubernetes ServiceAccount token review, mTLS via
|
|
the cluster's own CA, or a shared secret header. Note that the Deployment
|
|
currently sets `automountServiceAccountToken: false`, so option one changes
|
|
the pod spec.
|
|
- Whether caller identity only authenticates, or also constrains: may
|
|
`user-engine` ask questions about resources owned by `tenant-engine`? A
|
|
caller allowlist per `system` is the natural shape and flex-auth's registry
|
|
already keys on `system`.
|
|
- Fail-closed vs fail-open during rollout. Given `policy.enabled` is off in
|
|
production and both consumers are ours, a warn-only phase that logs
|
|
unauthenticated callers before rejecting them is available and probably
|
|
right.
|
|
- Whether NetworkPolicy is a sufficient interim control to declare `A1`
|
|
honestly before the real fix lands.
|
|
|
|
Target level `A2` — a single inbound choke point binding caller identity —
|
|
with the §13 evidence artifact: a test that an unbound request is refused.
|
|
|
|
Ship through the FLEX-WP-0011 staged-promotion path, not by direct apply.
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: FLEX-WP-0015-T03
|
|
status: todo
|
|
priority: medium
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "64eb7652-3b67-4bfb-879b-8588deeec8b5"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Wire or delete `internal/adapters/tenantengine`.** The adapter is complete
|
|
and has no non-test caller; `decision.Engine` has no field for it. Both
|
|
outcomes are conformant, silence is not.
|
|
|
|
Deciding factor is whether any live policy needs `tenant_roles` for a
|
|
privileged, destructive, credential-vending or `aal2`-class decision — the
|
|
IAM Profile's own trigger list. If yes, wire it into the decision path with a
|
|
timeout and an explicit unavailable-path decision (`AttachToContext` already
|
|
carries `tenant_roles_available: false` for exactly this), and note the new
|
|
synchronous dependency on tenant-engine's availability. If no, delete it and
|
|
say so in the review record rather than leaving it as latent capability.
|
|
|
|
Update `tenancy.yaml` `I` either way.
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: FLEX-WP-0015-T04
|
|
status: wait
|
|
priority: low
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "06432560-c28c-4de2-a672-87e74be54a6a"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**AuthZEN evaluation endpoint (framework `A4`).** Deliberately deferred, not
|
|
backlogged. `POST /access/v1/evaluation` translating onto the existing engine
|
|
beside `/v1/check`, non-breaking.
|
|
|
|
**Trigger to start:** either a PEP arrives that flex-auth's operator does not
|
|
control, or a delegated backend under FLEX-WP-0004 needs uniform addressing.
|
|
Until one of those, A4 buys swappability nobody can use.
|
|
|
|
Note when starting: AuthZEN standardises the envelope, not the action
|
|
vocabulary — it does not end action-string copying between repos. The cheaper
|
|
fix for that is serving `registry.Actions` read-only, which is independent of
|
|
this task and may be worth doing first.
|
|
|
|
```task
|
|
id: FLEX-WP-0015-T05
|
|
status: todo
|
|
priority: medium
|
|
state_hub_task_id: "9195ba20-ab0f-4d75-b293-86978073beb1"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Guard the declaration.** Framework §12 requires verifying the declared
|
|
posture still holds — against our own declaration, not a universal maximum.
|
|
|
|
Small mechanical check, `make verify-posture`, in the shape tenant-engine used
|
|
for `verify-pin` (bash, no dependency tree). Assert what code can actually
|
|
prove: that the `/v1/check` handler has caller authentication iff
|
|
`tenancy.yaml` claims `A >= 2`; that `tenantengine` has a non-test caller iff
|
|
`I >= 3`; that the production Deployment carries no `--log` and no volume iff
|
|
`R` is `n/a`. Exit 1 on drift.
|
|
|
|
Designed for invisible failure per §12: posture regression returns
|
|
correct-looking responses, exactly like the two silent pin rollbacks the
|
|
estate has already been bitten by.
|