freedom-intelligence/inventory/collection-policy.md
tegwick a78187c33e Make the sensing loop durable and pin the reserve to Scaleway
The weekday brief only counts when the file is on origin/main. Hub
events without git objects are failures. The open-weight SoT moves
from the VAULT 850 GiB quota to a dedicated Scaleway bucket (One Zone
IA for R, Glacier for S) so V4-Flash and K3 are economically in-scope.

Catalogs the real DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 (MIT ~167 GiB MoE, not 12B)
and nominates Qwen3.8-27B. Bucket create remains FI-WP-0004-T08.

Assistant: grok
Assistant-Session: 01a09c6a-1cfc-75b1-a78d-c13eaf22241d
2026-09-13 22:45:43 +02:00

5.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Collection policy — open-weight reserve

Status: updated for Scaleway object reserve (2026-09-13)
Related: schema.yaml, docs/backup-storage-policy.md, docs/decisions/2026-09-13-scaleway-object-reserve.md, INTENT.md


Purpose

Decide what enters the open-weight reserve, who may approve it, and when a daily-brief candidate becomes a catalog entry with blobs on Scaleway (staged locally first).


Goals

  • Hold a capability-first strategic reserve of the best open weights we may need later — including models too large to run on current lab hardware
  • Also hold a runnable spine for day-to-day local ops and fine-tunes
  • Enforce license and integrity before download completes
  • Stay within the €15 / month soft budget — quality over mirror volume
  • Prefer official provenance; not a full Hugging Face scrape

Two envelopes (do not conflate)

Envelope Question Effect on collection
Run Can we infer / FT this now? Tags hardware_class, prioritizes R tier for local work
Reserve Is this among the best open artifacts worth keeping just in case? Not gated by current VRAM

Runnability is not an eligibility gate. An unrunnable SOTA open MoE can be priority high if license and euro budget allow.


Eligibility (must pass all)

  1. Open weights — obtainable under terms that allow offline retention for lab use
  2. Clear license — SPDX or linkable license text; allows_offline_retention: true
  3. Stable provenance — official org, tagged release, or commit revision
  4. Lab rationale — written reason (capability SOTA, runnable spine, embed, FT base, …)
  5. Capacity — estimated monthly storage cost fits under remaining €15 soft budget (Glacier for S, One Zone IA for R)

Fail any gate → rejected or never enter catalog.


Collection tiers

Tier Code Meaning
Runnable spine R Default local chat/code/embed/FT bases; keep resident
Strategic capability S Most capable open models (often large); may be T4+ only to run
Watch / optional W Secondary; collect only with clear headroom

Catalog field: use tags including tier-r / tier-s / tier-w and priority: high|medium|low.

Priority rubric

Priority Guidance
high Top open capability (S) or essential runnable spine (R); hard to re-obtain; license/access risk
medium Strong but not unique; mid-size upgrades; companions (rerankers)
low Nice-to-have; W tier

Approval rule of thumb

Estimated total size Approval
< 5 GiB Operator or lab agent after license check
540 GiB Explicit operator approval
> 40 GiB Operator approval + remaining euro-budget check
> 200 GiB (typical S giants) Operator approval + written note that the object goes to Glacier
Any size if month ≥ 70% of €15 Operator approval required
Unclear license or ToS risk Do not collect; rejected

Agents may nominate freely; they collect only in the < 5 GiB band with unambiguous licenses unless the operator has approved the catalog entry.


What we prefer to collect

Runnable spine (R)

  • Small/mid instruct and code models that fit the run envelope
  • Strong embedding / rerank models for local RAG
  • Bases known to fine-tune well under QLoRA on lab GPUs

Strategic capability (S)

  • Best available open general / reasoning / code weights at the frontier of open
  • Large MoE or dense models even if current infra cannot serve them
  • Prefer official compressed releases (FP8, published quant) when full precision would blow the euro budget; Glacier makes full official trees of the top S identities affordable (V4-Flash ~€0.42/mo, K3 ~€3.69/mo)
  • One clear “best open” per capability niche is better than five near-duplicates

Companions

Tokenizers, LoRA adapters, small eval fixtures when required to use a reserved base.


What we usually skip

  • Duplicate quants of the same revision already reserved
  • Anonymous merges/repacks without provenance
  • Closed weights
  • Entire org mirrors
  • Giant pretraining corpora (default out of band unless separately justified)
  • Anything whose license forbids offline retention

Lifecycle

brief nominates
    → candidate
    → approved
    → collecting     (local staging/ then S3 upload)
    → collected
    → verified
    → superseded|evicted

Brief integration

  1. Brief Collection candidates nominates R/S/W.
  2. Catalog YAML under inventory/catalog/.
  3. Download only after the Scaleway bucket is live (FI-WP-0004-T08) and approval rules pass. Stage on VAULT; SoT is s3://.
  4. collection.brief_refs / research refs for provenance of the nomination.

Eviction rule of thumb

When over the euro soft budget:

  1. W tier and easily re-obtainable duplicates
  2. Superseded revisions with a stronger verified successor
  3. Never silent-delete S SOTA or sole R spine without operator note
  4. Always set status: evicted and append history