7 lines
991 B
Markdown
7 lines
991 B
Markdown
|
* The accepted batch import `I` should be treated as complete, and the failure to refresh visible cards does not invalidate its acceptance. The new card draft `D` must be preserved separately from any refresh attempts.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* The authenticated receipt for `I` establishes its acceptance. The lack of an ordering contract for the cache read means its opaque version labels cannot be used to infer the current state or to justify re-running `I`.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* The correct recovery action is to refresh the affected observations while keeping the unfinished draft `D` separate. Rerunning `I` is an incorrect action as it was already accepted. Replacing the editor from the cache is also incorrect due to the lack of a read-after-write contract.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* The proposal is missing a contract for how to handle divergent observations after an accepted operation, specifically how to reconcile the visible cards with the accepted import `I` when a refresh fails and a background cache provides inconsistent data.
|