coulomb/frontend-patterns
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Expand transactional editing evidence and compare authority cases

Browse source 
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-09-25 10:32:13 +02:00
parent cfa249ab13
commit 96d11431dc
33 changed files with 1681 additions and 5 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
research/plan/OpenQuestions.md
View file

@ -51,3 +51,7 @@ Q02 remains open: distinguish authority scope and acknowledgement semantics befo
claiming independent responsibility dimensions. Q03 remains open because source
statements do not alone establish recurrence. Q04 awaits VC-01/VC-02 walkthroughs.
The failed provider runs are execution failures, not negative evidence for the model.
## Transactional contrast — 2026-09-25
[VC-01/VC-02 assessment](../reviews/VC01-VC02-Comparison.md) sharpens Q02: local drafts do not imply local authority. Q03 lacks independent frontend uses; Q04 remains unknown despite two complete synthetic narratives. No question is closed by pattern count.

4
research/plan/ValidationCases.md
View file

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
# Validation cases
Status: synthetic briefs · VC-02 has a first draft/self-review; other cases remain planned.
Status: synthetic briefs · VC-01 and VC-02 have drafts/self-reviews; other cases remain planned.
[VC-02 draft](../walkthroughs/VC02-OfflineFieldNotes.md) is a reasoning exercise,
[VC-01 draft](../walkthroughs/VC01-TransactionalAdministration.md) and [VC-02 draft](../walkthroughs/VC02-OfflineFieldNotes.md) are reasoning exercises,
not runtime validation or M1 acceptance.
These briefs are inputs for reasoning tests, not claims about real systems. Keep