frontend-patterns/registry/capabilities/capability.infotech.frontend-pattern-language.md

id	name	summary	owner	status	domain	tags	maturity	external_evidence	discovery	availability	relations	evidence	consumer_guidance	promotion_history
capability.infotech.frontend-pattern-language	Frontend architecture pattern reference	Reason about frontend shared edits, offline recovery, navigation and rendering with versioned candidate patterns, alternatives and evidence limits.	frontend-patterns	draft	infotech	frontend architecture patterns offline mutation recovery navigation rendering	discovery availability current target confidence rationale D3 D4 medium Two bounded decision sequences, qualified source reviews, alternatives and explicit gaps; ecosystem usefulness remains unverified. current target confidence rationale A0 A0 high Informational Markdown and JSON reference; no frontend runtime or service offered.	completeness reliability level confidence basis satisfied_expectations broken_expectations out_of_scope_expectations C1 medium scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations two core decision paths and seventeen qualified candidate records complete implementation recipes and production guarantees level confidence basis known_reliability_risks R0 high consumer_quality_signals no measured ecosystem consumer outcomes full-contract recurrence unassessed	intent includes excludes assumptions use_cases research_memos Help a consumer turn frontend constraints into a small explainable configuration and implementation questions. transactional edit recovery local offline work candidate relations mechanism mappings stated abstention boundaries complete security architecture offline global exclusivity framework rankings certified production recipes consumer checks applicability and implementation contracts draft hypotheses retain their evidence limits VC-01 VC-02 research/reviews/M1-SeedReview.md research/reviews/PreviewOntology-0.1.md	current_level target_level current_artifacts target_artifacts consumption_modes A0 A0 START.md reference/0.1/index.json reference/0.1/manifest.json informational markdown json	depends_on supports related_to	documentation tests consumer_feedback bug_reports incidents START.md reference/0.1/ReleaseReview.md docs/ReuseAndImprovementLoop.md tests/test_reference_preview.py	recommended_for not_recommended_for known_limitations frontend architectural decision notes reviewing shared-edit and offline-recovery assumptions claiming canonical maturity or production guarantees treating a match score as applicability proof all candidates are hypotheses no independent human usefulness result use feedback automation not deployed

Frontend architecture pattern reference

Start at the decision guide. Pin the reference version and packaging commit, inspect the candidate contracts, and cite selected IDs and unresolved conditions in your decision note. The JSON export supports agent navigation; it is a research candidate surface, not an admitted canonical graph.

Qualified extension hypotheses cover navigation, rendering and feature/interaction boundaries. Their presence does not imply a complete sequence for those contexts.

The reuse and improvement contract defines how consumer decisions and later outcomes will improve this language. Receipt collection and unattended improvement require WP-0008 implementation; do not imply that recording reused in registry telemetry already measures helpfulness.