frontend-patterns/research/evaluations/language-pilot-01/raw/r12/answer.md
tegwick 3690af12a5 Record twelve pilot sessions and masked editorial judgments
Assistant: codex
Assistant-Model: gpt-6-astra
Assistant-Session: 01a0cffe-206f-7323-89d3-b20ca4cf4bf9
2026-09-26 20:04:29 +02:00

858 B

Here's an assessment of the proposed frontend architecture:

  • Outcome/State: The product cannot guarantee survival of edits through device loss or complete power failure, nor can it claim conflict resolution is solved.
  • Preserved Information: Only two copies of a conflict are retained on the same device, and the sync protocol propagates deletions, which is insufficient for robust recovery.
  • Recovery Action and Rejected Alternative: The current local transaction only handles process restarts; it cannot recover from power or device loss. Removing conflict review from the keyboard interface is premature and risky.
  • Missing Contract or Clarification: There's no documented contract for restart-safe storage beyond process restart, nor for how deletions are handled during conflict resolution or synchronization across devices.